Hi,
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Read the ATA and SCSI specifications. Or ask on either mailing list.
In short, the drive presents its LBA addressing based on 512B sectors.
The kernel can't choose to ignore that--it's stuck with it. Since the
drive is presenting LBA based on 512B sectors, there is no
Adrian Levi wrote:
> Is the output from the date command a string or integer wrt date +%w?
The date command only produces string output. %w produces one of the
characters 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
> I'm trying to test a condition in my backup script where i want to
> match on day of week = 0
>
> The
Is the output from the date command a string or integer wrt date +%w?
I'm trying to test a condition in my backup script where i want to
match on day of week = 0
The program flow I am trying to achieve is" If the file exists and the
day of the week is 0 then remove the file and set the day of the
> Read the ATA and SCSI specifications. Or ask on either mailing list.
> In short, the drive presents its LBA addressing based on 512B sectors.
> The kernel can't choose to ignore that--it's stuck with it. Since the
> drive is presenting LBA based on 512B sectors, there is no way the
> kernel can
> "MUST READ: Western Digital is unable to provide support for the
> Unix/Linux operating systems outside of jumper configurations (for
> EIDE hard drives) and physical installation support."
While I never expect any OS-specific support from hard-drive suppliers,
I find it offensive for a manufact
>> > I'm down on these drives due to the maniacal 8 second head park
>> > interval, which likely does more mechanical damage than it saves power
>> > in dollar terms.
>> There is simply no concrete evidence to back this urban legend.
> In the WD20EARS I purchased this was in no way just a legend --
On Du, 16 ian 11, 01:00:50, Javier Barroso wrote:
> When you invoke aptitude unmarkauto ... aptitude has all your packages
> with auto mark, so aptitude will want to delete these unused packages
> *before* it start with your operation (unmarkauto in this case). I
> think it make sense
Well, '(un)m
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:36:07 +0200
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sb, 15 ian 11, 14:55:08, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> > as per the wiki
> >
> > I change the default in /etc/default/grub from 0 to 4.
> >
> > I ran update-grub.
> >
> > The same entry boots by default, i.e. it didn't work.
> >
> >
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Sb, 15 ian 11, 19:42:26, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>
>> Actually this only helps cleaning the system of unneeded packages, but
>> still leaves me with a lot of packages not marked auto, so I had to
>> apply Javier's hack after all.
>
> Ok, t
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> >> > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> >> > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the ke
Jack Schneider wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > > used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
> > > a live Ubun
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> Jack Schneider wrote:
>> >
>> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
>> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
>> > used or form
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
>> > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
>> > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
>> > >> will change the mdX designation
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Jack Schneider wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0500
> Tom H wrote:
>> >> >
> [BIG SNIP]
>
>> >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
>> >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
>> >> will change the mdX
On Sb, 15 ian 11, 14:55:08, bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> as per the wiki
>
> I change the default in /etc/default/grub from 0 to 4.
>
> I ran update-grub.
>
> The same entry boots by default, i.e. it didn't work.
>
> Anyone know why ?
Please post the outputs of 'grep default= /boot/grub/grub.cf
as per the wiki
I change the default in /etc/default/grub from 0 to 4.
I ran update-grub.
The same entry boots by default, i.e. it didn't work.
Anyone know why ?
Brian
For reference:
Configuring grub v2
The configuration file is /boot/grub/grub.cfg, but you shouldn't edit
it directly. This
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
> > a live U
Jesus arteche wrote:
> I have a web application that I want to scale in a cluster like Amazon EC2.
> I have a load balancer and behind several web server (Apache2). My question
> is:
>
> How can I make for the session that is iniciated in webserver 1...will be
> available in webserver 2 cause the
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:15:11PM -0800, evenso wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:52:01PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:50:39 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> >
> > > Good day.
> >
> > It's late afternoon here :-P
> >
> > > Are in Debian the packages holding dictionaries capable
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 07:52:01PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:50:39 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
>
> > Good day.
>
> It's late afternoon here :-P
>
> > Are in Debian the packages holding dictionaries capable to work w/
> > stardict?
> >
> > I see plenty of dictionaries for dict
On Sb, 15 ian 11, 14:31:13, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> (aptitude unmarkauto $(cat pkg.list)) should do what you want, and extra
> newlines and spaces wouldn't matter even if the file contained them.
Thanks for the tip, that saves a 'tr' invocation in my solution.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Off
On Sb, 15 ian 11, 19:42:26, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> Actually this only helps cleaning the system of unneeded packages, but
> still leaves me with a lot of packages not marked auto, so I had to
> apply Javier's hack after all.
Ok, this looks like the best version so far:
Backup:
aptitude --di
In <20110115133957.gi4...@wasteland.homelinux.net>, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>Florian Kulzer:
>> […] Backticks should also work if you want to avoid the $(...)
>> bashism.
>
>That's not a bashism, it's perfectly legal POSIX/SUS.
It's also preferred over backticks since you can't nest backticks AND som
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:16:16 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:55:54 -0800, Joe Riel wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:47:59 -0800 Joe Riel wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:38:43 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
> >>
> >> > You can:
> >> >
> >> > 1/ Start the system with
In <20110115110130.GC15639@think.homelan>, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>My usual method of 'cleaning' the system was to set all installed
>packages to auto-installed and then mark one by one the ones I need to
>keep.
>
>aptitude --schedule-only markauto ~i
>
>Seems to be doing the first part, but I c
Hello List,
I own a Logitech QuickCamPro and it doesn't work with Squeeze, any other
people who have the same problem or no problem with it ?!
Only thing I found relevant was a closed bug :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2010/06/msg00310.html
Greetings!
--
Slobodan
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
hi guys,
I have a web application that I want to scale in a cluster like Amazon EC2.
I have a load balancer and behind several web server (Apache2). My question
is:
How can I make for the session that is iniciated in webserver 1...will be
available in webserver 2 cause the load balancer maybe can
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:55:54 -0800, Joe Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:47:59 -0800 Joe Riel wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:38:43 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> > You can:
>> >
>> > 1/ Start the system with no xorg (console) and leave it so for
>> > sometine to check if the problem
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 01:50:39 +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
It's late afternoon here :-P
> Are in Debian the packages holding dictionaries capable to work w/
> stardict?
>
> I see plenty of dictionaries for dict use, for example, but not for
> stardict. Or it is almost unusable program in
Good day.
Are in Debian the packages holding dictionaries capable to work w/
stardict?
I see plenty of dictionaries for dict use, for example, but not for
stardict. Or it is almost unusable program in Debian repo - as the
interface program w/o the dictionaries seems to me as VCR w/o the
tapes. :)
Stan Hoeppner writes:
> Carl Johnson put forth on 1/13/2011 11:34 AM:
>
>> Processors Time (seconds)
>> P1 66
>> P2 36
>> P3 25
>> P4 20
>> P5 20
>> P6 20
>> P7 20
>> P8 20
>
> Your number
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:47:59 -0800
Joe Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:38:43 + (UTC)
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > You can:
> >
> > 1/ Start the system with no xorg (console) and leave it so for
> > sometine to check if the problem is still present (even with no x
> > server).
>
> I'll att
On Sb, 15 ian 11, 14:14:11, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sb, 15 ian 11, 12:23:07, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > >
> > > Any other suggestions?
> >
> > aptitude --schedule-only unmarkauto $(cat pkg.list)
>
> Do you mean after a '--schedule-only markauto ~i'? Hmm, let's try...
> Nope, not what I need
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:06:11 -0200
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> > > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> > > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the
> > > >> kernel will change the mdX desig
Le samedi 15 janvier, Florian Kulzer écrivit :
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 13:01:30 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> [...]
>
> aptitude --schedule-only unmarkauto $(cat pkg.list)
>
> is somewhat clumsy, but it seems to work here. I only tried a simple
> test case with a list of two packages, and I
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Jack Schneider wrote:
> > >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> > >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
> > >> will change the mdX designations.
> > >>
> > >> Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your partitions.
Wha
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:25:45 -0700
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Jack Schneider wrote:
> > I have a raid1 based W/S running Debian Squeeze uptodate. (was
> > until ~7 days ago) There are 4 drives, 2 of which had never been
> > used or formatted. I configured a new array using Disk Utility from
> > a live U
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:16:37 -0500
Tom H wrote:
> >> >
[BIG SNIP]
> >> You might want to try configuring grub and fstab to use UUID's
> >> instead of /dev/mdX. That removes the possibility that the kernel
> >> will change the mdX designations.
> >>
> >> Use blkid to find out the UUID's of your p
Florian Kulzer:
>
> […] Backticks should also work if you want to avoid the $(...)
> bashism.
That's not a bashism, it's perfectly legal POSIX/SUS.
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_03
J.
--
In this bunker there are women and children. There are
On 2011-01-15 12:58 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:03:19 -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:37:11PM EST, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> [..]
>>
>>> Maybe it's time for you attach/upload the whole "/var/log/Xorg.0.log"
>>> file :-)
>>
>> Hey.. why not..
>>
>> ht
On Sb, 15 ian 11, 12:23:07, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> > Any other suggestions?
>
> aptitude --schedule-only unmarkauto $(cat pkg.list)
Do you mean after a '--schedule-only markauto ~i'? Hmm, let's try...
Nope, not what I needed. But the solution seems to be:
aptitude --schedule-only markau
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:03:19 -0500, Chris Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:37:11PM EST, Camaleón wrote:
>
> [..]
>
>> Maybe it's time for you attach/upload the whole "/var/log/Xorg.0.log"
>> file :-)
>
> Hey.. why not..
>
> http://pastebin.com/38DZcW7D
Thanks :-)
Some comments on
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Sb, 15 ian 11, 12:25:26, Javier Barroso wrote:
>>
>> If you have a packages.txt file with a package by line, do it with awk:
>>
>> aptitude markauto '~i'$(awk '{printf "!~n^"$1"$";}' packages.txt)
>>
>> And a similar trick marking these
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 13:01:30 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
[...]
> How can I:
>
> - set everything to auto-installed
> - automatically mark as manually installed the ones in the list
>
> ?
>
> I already tried (as root):
>
> aptitude markauto ~i
>
> This will try to remove everything
On Sb, 15 ian 11, 12:29:15, Javier Barroso wrote:
> >
> > And a similar trick marking these packages like manual installed.
> Maybe essential packages should be installed no auto (add !~E to expression)
Not needed since apt/aptitude will never auto-remove packages
'Essential: yes'.
Regards,
Andr
On Sb, 15 ian 11, 12:25:26, Javier Barroso wrote:
>
> If you have a packages.txt file with a package by line, do it with awk:
>
> aptitude markauto '~i'$(awk '{printf "!~n^"$1"$";}' packages.txt)
>
> And a similar trick marking these packages like manual installed.
Thanks, at a first glance tha
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Javier Barroso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Andrei Popescu
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My usual method of 'cleaning' the system was to set all installed
>> packages to auto-installed and then mark one by one the ones I need to
>> keep. I even have
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My usual method of 'cleaning' the system was to set all installed
> packages to auto-installed and then mark one by one the ones I need to
> keep. I even have a good list generated with:
>
> aptitude -F '%?p' search '~i!~M' > b
Hi,
My usual method of 'cleaning' the system was to set all installed
packages to auto-installed and then mark one by one the ones I need to
keep. I even have a good list generated with:
aptitude -F '%?p' search '~i!~M' > bak/pkg.list
Now the problem I'm facing is that (probably due to some ap
49 matches
Mail list logo
