On Wednesday 17 November 2004 00:44, Michael Z Daryabeygi wrote:
>
>
Don't sent html to this mailing list
--
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you,
then they fight you, then you win. --Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Sharninder Khera wrote:
Hi All,
First of all, sorry for this OT post and I'm prepared to be flamed for
this but I think we should all read the txt below and give it a thought
and help, if we can.
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/PAT-NEEDS-YOUR-HELP.
txt
--
Sharninder
Why
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 21:25 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
> >> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
> >
> > Well and to close the cir
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:08:26PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:23:05PM +0100, Martin Lorenz wrote:
> > In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > > >>>I have just complete a PDF form using both acroba
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 21:27 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> That's not free. They just don't charge you any money.
> >
> > Of course it is.
> >
> > $ dict free
> > [snip]
> > {Free cost}, freedom from
Where should I put commands to be executed when I login, & when I open
an xterm, but not when a shell is run on other occasions?
I want some commands executed when I login, but not when a shell is
otherwise run, so I put them in my ~/.login, vs. my ~/.bashrc.
Unfortunately, they aren't executed
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 12:04:40AM -0500, Allen Williams wrote:
> Trying to install sarge (woody doesn't have the support for my intel 1000M
> ethernet card), plain vanilla x86 hardware: Linux system was previously
> installed. I've tried four or five different releases of sarge, with
> different
Hi All,
First of all, sorry for this OT post and I'm prepared to be flamed for
this but I think we should all read the txt below and give it a thought
and help, if we can.
ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackware/slackware-current/PAT-NEEDS-YOUR-HELP.
txt
--
Sharninder
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Apparently, _Riccardo Tortorici_, on 16/11/04 22:39,typed:
Check your iptables settings...I had this problem months ago...
What did you find your problem was? How did you solve it?
->HS
H. S. wrote:
On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking
unusually long time to give the tabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That's not free. They just don't charge you any money.
>
> Of course it is.
>
> $ dict free
> [snip]
> {Free cost}, freedom from charges or expenses. --South.
> [snip]
The default free in the context of fre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
>> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
>
> Well and to close the circle clamav sucks by default cause the virus
> database is not maintained
Trying to install sarge (woody doesn't have the support for my intel 1000M
ethernet card), plain vanilla x86 hardware: Linux system was previously
installed. I've tried four or five different releases of sarge, with
different dates, and searched email archives and Google and found (almost)
nothing
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:23:16PM -0500, Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
> Hi all,
> Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
If you have to ask, you shouldn't even be running testing in the first
place.
--
For every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
H. S. wrote:
> On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking unusually
> long time to give the table:
> However, 'route -n' command gives the output almost instantly.
By default, 'route' attempts to resolve the IP addresses into hostnames. The
extra time of 'route' vs 'route -n'
Check your iptables settings...I had this problem months ago...
H. S. wrote:
On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking unusually
long time to give the table:
~# time route
Kernel IP routing table
DestinationGateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
x.y.z.z
On November 16, 2004 19:44, Michael Z Daryabeygi wrote:
Please reconfigure Thunderbird to stop sending out HTML-only messages
(is this some kind of new default setting with TB?)
>
> Okay I'm done, this has gone to far.
Yep
And have you got TB set to top-post as well?
>
>
> William Ballard
On Debian Testing running 2.6.7,the 'route' command is taking unusually
long time to give the table:
~# time route
Kernel IP routing table
DestinationGateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
x.y.z.z* 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
192.168.1.0
Thanks for the advice. It looks like I'll be at this for a while...if
I can't make any headway with it, I'll ask for more help
Thanks again,
da
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 03:11:38 -0600, Yusuf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your firewall rules look, uh, ugly, meaning, not meant for human eyes.
> You sh
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:27:21 + (GMT)
Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- "Rodney D. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any idea how to correct this?
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281601
>
> -- Thomas Adam
Just grabbed the "new" file listed in the bug rep
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
> Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
If you want to track Sarge, not Testing, after Sarge becomes stable.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for responding. But this is exactly what i am doing. I am booting off
the boot
floppy with my previous kernel.
I guess my question is: Is there a way I can find out how the MBR is
configured?
--- Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:34:14AM -0800, Punit A
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 19:49 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> David Jardine writes:
> > vi is the bee's knees. Sod emacs. aptitude is rubbish. Stick to
> > apt-get.
>
> > Is that better?
>
> Much. Let's have flamewars about things that _matter_.
Such as this: Sarge. D-I. Sarge. D-I. Think about it
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 09:09 pm, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Maybe I should say:
It seems close to release time for Sarge. Would now be a good time to start
tracking Sarge instead of testing? I don't want to continue doing updates
past the release and then have to backtrack.
Thanks
Ralph
> Ralp
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.2318 +0100]:
> Why is node01 being identified by its IP only
Also thanks to weasel, this was due to the IP address missing from
the comma-separated list preceeding each key in the global
ssh_known_hosts file. If the line only reads
nod
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.01.0810 +0100]:
> We are successfully using SSH hostkey-based authentication for our
> cluster. What I find really strange is that users still get to see
> messages like:
>
> Warning: Permanently added the RSA host key for IP address
> '
Ralph Crongeyer wrote:
Hi all,
Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
Thanks
Ralph
That depends on your purpose in so doing, the primary function
of your system and whether you prefer to continue to track
testing for more current software or want a more stable syste
David Jardine writes:
> vi is the bee's knees. Sod emacs. aptitude is rubbish. Stick to
> apt-get.
> Is that better?
Much. Let's have flamewars about things that _matter_.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
As Thomas previously suggested:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281601
bye
Robert Tilley wrote:
The sed package causes apt-get upgrade to stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get -f upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been ke
Sed's postinst contains this line, which fails:
sudo install-info --quiet --section "General commands" "General
commands" /usr/share/info/sed.info
The bug is apparently resolved so a fix should be on the way.
Robert Tilley wrote:
The sed package causes apt-get upgrade to stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
The sed package causes apt-get upgrade to stop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get -f upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libqt3-compat-headers libqt3-headers libqt3-mt-dev libqt3c102-mt
qt3-dev-tools
The following packag
Perhaps this is what you're looking for?
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Priority: optional
Section: net
Installed-Size: 196
Maintainer: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NFS exports are configured in /etc/exports
Tom Allison wrote:
Um... I'm kind of stuck on something that seems too simple...
NFS wi
Tom Allison said on Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:31:39PM -0500:
> Um... I'm kind of stuck on something that seems too simple...
>
> NFS with kernel 2.6.8.
>
> I have nfs-common installed, but I can't seem to find any other packages
> to configure it. I'm a little stuck because I'm trying to install
Um... I'm kind of stuck on something that seems too simple...
NFS with kernel 2.6.8.
I have nfs-common installed, but I can't seem to find any other packages
to configure it. I'm a little stuck because I'm trying to install LTSP
and it's complaining that I have nothing installed for NFS.
--
To
Michael Z Daryabeygi writes:
> Human beings are multi-faceted. Free Software benefits from intellectual
> people who have many interests.
There are other mailing lists for your other interests.
> You are arguing that politics is irrelevant and relevant at the same
> time.
Perhaps he is, but I a
Hi all,
Hey, is now a good time to switch my sources from "testing" to "sarge"?
Thanks
Ralph
--
Linux, to keep you humble.
pgpKPdrLlZb6S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Alex Malinovich wrote:
WRT the actual topic, squashfs is supposed to handle files up to 4 GB
without problems. I have not heard of any 2 GB file problems with it,
but my interest in squashfs has been purely academic. I've never run it
in a business environment.
While it is a read-only filesyste
sorry, this was due to the rc_expand_param zsh option, which was set
in a script I accidentally sourced.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debi
Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have seen cramfs and squashfs both of which have sub 2GB filesize
limit problems and read/write random access issues. So they don't fit
my needs. Please don't respond saying "just gzip each file" duh... I
already thought of that.
Hi,
Squashfs has a 4 GB filesi
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:08:32 -0500
jwyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. Nothing will seem to poweroff my PC. I have tried various
> commands, all with the same results. shutdown -h now
> powerdown
> halt
> $ su -c '/sbin/halt'
Try passing this option to the kernel:
apm=power-off
You d
On Monday 15 November 2004 19:39,
Davor_Balder/FOAMS/PACBRANDS/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have recently acquired a router/dsl modem with built-in firewall
> (according to manufacturers technical documentation) and am planning to use
> it with my Debian box.
>
> I have noticed there i
i was speaking for myself and those who commented that they didn't mind.
I really don't think Curt was trying to be divisive?
Are we really so fickle?
Am I really not going to seek your help or value your opinion on debian
if I think you are a political dolt?
Come on people. I don't care what
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 08:45, Derek "The Monkey" Wueppelmann wrote:
> I know this is an old thread now, but I finally got a chance to try out
> the above. And while I was very hopeful in that it might work it still
> ended up with the same results. I don't know about everybody else but I
> am
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:47:43PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>
> Inflammatory political comments are divisive, and those who post them know
> it.
vi is the bee's knees. Sod emacs.
aptitude is rubbish. Stick to apt-get.
Is that better?
--
David Jardine
"Running Debian GNU/Linux and
loving e
He didn't throw a stick of dynamite!
His comment was about the media. not about politics.
You were just a ticking time bomb.
You are so contradictory. You claim that Curt was allowing the
interpretation that Open Source is motivated by a Bin Laden like jihad
against microsoft. You were the o
I have the following Z shell function:
pub () {
scp -q $@ albatross:public_html/scratch
ssh albatross "cd public_html/scratch && chmod 0644 $@"
}
When I run it on multiple files, however, something weird happens:
cirrus:/tmp> touch a b
cirrus:/tmp> set -x
cirrus:/tmp> pub a b
+ pub a b
+ scp
I'm wondering... should I delay mine...?
Riccardo Tortorici wrote:
Maybe is a bug...
I've encountered it 10 minutes ago after an apt-get upgrade on "sid"...
Rodney D. Myers wrote:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--- "Rodney D. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any idea how to correct this?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=281601
-- Thomas Adam
=
"The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- http://linuxgazette.net
"TAG Editor" -- http://linuxgazette.net
" We'll just save up yo
Maybe is a bug...
I've encountered it 10 minutes ago after an apt-get upgrade on "sid"...
Rodney D. Myers wrote:
I'm running sarge, and just finished running "sudo aptitude update &&
sudo aptitude upgrade".
All usually goes fine, except today. I'm now getting this error
message;
sudo aptitude upgra
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 18:48 -0500, Ben Russo wrote:
> Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> still wondering if there might be an option for a
> compressed filesystem anyone??
NTFS? ;)
Seriously, though, it's my und
Juha Siltala wrote:
On 2004-11-16, Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
instead. http://www.clamav.net/
Hmmm... except F-Prot for Linux for the workstation is free for personal
use.
That's not free. The
William Ballard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:43:54PM -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
didn't even get political. I said that reporters and editors tend to
miscomprehend motivations that they do not share themselves, even
when repeatedly informed of what those motivations are. I then cited
a pr
I'm running sarge, and just finished running "sudo aptitude update &&
sudo aptitude upgrade".
All usually goes fine, except today. I'm now getting this error
message;
sudo aptitude upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing packa
Andrew Schulman wrote:
There is a ridiculous oversupply of ftp servers in Debian:
I want something simple, for anonymous access. I was going to use
oftpd, which is an anonymous-only server; but it doesn't allow uploads.
I like vsftpd It's config file mihgt look like:
# lot's of comments
Title: Melding
Hi
I installed sarge
from weekly isos dated 25/10-2004 on a new computer with nforce3 chipset.
Installed with default kernel 2.4.27
First only the the
base packages, then x-window-system and finally kdebase.
Installed the
kernel-headers for the kernel and then the newest
Hi all,
I just got my system up and running (went from Mandrake to Debian) and i'm
having problems getting Postfix to authenticate with saslauthd.
This is on a "Testing"/"Sarge" system.
To check that sasl is working, I used the testsaslauthd command:
testsaslauthd -u my-username -p my-password
-f
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:09:25 -0500
Michael Z Daryabeygi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing that gets my goat on lists is when people complain
> about OT or ask people to take things off list.
> lists are first about community.
I have been hoping this wouldn't pop up in here. I recently
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 06:43:54PM -0500, Curt Howland wrote:
> didn't even get political. I said that reporters and editors tend to
> miscomprehend motivations that they do not share themselves, even
> when repeatedly informed of what those motivations are. I then cited
> a present-day example
You can also try loading the APM module (older, but it's the first thing
I load whem I'm installing).
I had this problem the first few times I installed and was going out of
my mind.
jwyman wrote:
Hi. Nothing will seem to poweroff my PC. I have tried various
commands, all with the same resul
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(see below for long story background )
The last time I created a large HW RAID5 volume (1.6 TB) the kernel was
unable to see all of it... If I create several smaller block devices
(like 400GB each)
Michael Z Daryabeygi writes:
> lists are first about community. The value of spontaneous community
> fosters the value in name. You can't have the latter without the former.
Inflammatory political comments are divisive, and those who post them know
it.
> So now the community is biting back.
Sp
William,
I didn't mention Bush, or Iraq, or any of the things you mentioned. I
didn't even get political. I said that reporters and editors tend to
miscomprehend motivations that they do not share themselves, even
when repeatedly informed of what those motivations are. I then cited
a present-d
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:17:25 -0500, Jason Rennie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 06:45:16PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > via82cxxx_audio21564 1
> > > ac97_codec 13300 0 [via82cxxx_audio]
> > > uart401 6436 0 [via82cxxx_audio]
> > > s
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 02:14 pm, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> I was just looking at the sources.list file on our Debian server and
> I realized we had unstable sources. I would guess that I used
> unstable in order to get Samba 3, which maybe wasn't available in
> testing at the time. But I don't k
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ben Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(see below for long story background )
>
>The last time I created a large HW RAID5 volume (1.6 TB) the kernel was
>unable to see all of it... If I create several smaller block devices
>(like 400GB each) can LVM bind them toget
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 22:50 +, Juha Siltala wrote:
> On 2004-11-16, Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> >> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
> >> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
> >
> > Hmmm... except F-Prot for Linux for the
Hi all,
I just got my system up and running (went from Mandrake to Debian) and i'm
having problems getting Postfix to authenticate with saslauthd.
This is on a "Testing"/"Sarge" system.
To check that sasl is working, I used the testsaslauthd command:
testsaslauthd -u my-username -p my-password
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:21:39 +, Rui Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i configured my apt sources.list by apt-setup and i said yes to the questions
> about a securityy source but when i run apt-get update it says that the site
> isn't there
>
> what is the line to put in my sources.list file?
Incoming from Rui Silva:
> i configured my apt sources.list by apt-setup and i said yes to the questions
> about a securityy source but when i run apt-get update it says that the site
> isn't there
>
> what is the line to put in my sources.list file???
>
> i'm running unstable
I run stable. M
Rui Silva wrote:
i configured my apt sources.list by apt-setup and i said yes to the questions
about a securityy source but when i run apt-get update it says that the site
isn't there
what is the line to put in my sources.list file???
i'm running unstable
There are no security updates for unstab
apparently you have no problem with topic drift
Why do you speak of Free Software as if it is ADD?
Human beings are multi-faceted.
Free Software benefits from intellectual people who have many interests.
I don't consider a statement that is received 50/50 for/against as a
very good zinger
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
I was just looking at the sources.list file on our Debian server and I
realized we had unstable sources. I would guess that I used unstable in
order to get Samba 3, which maybe wasn't available in testing at the
time. But I don't know. Anyhow, I would rather be using testin
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:01:26 -0600, Jeremy Turner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:59:11PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
> > Will the linux-* source files compile and build properly using
> > the kernel-package tools?
>
> Yes, they do. I use them on my own machines. I usually do
i configured my apt sources.list by apt-setup and i said yes to the questions
about a securityy source but when i run apt-get update it says that the site
isn't there
what is the line to put in my sources.list file???
i'm running unstable
--
Rui Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux
--
Basically to do anything other than nuke /home/$user, you need
root privileges, and if you have root; why bother with a virus.
--
TIMTOWTDI often means there is more than one really bad way to do it.
-- Tim Hammerquist after Tim Cuffel in comp.lang.perl.misc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On 2004-11-16, Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
>> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
>
> Hmmm... except F-Prot for Linux for the workstation is free for personal
> use.
That's not free. They just
8><
>
> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
Well and to close the circle clamav sucks by default cause the virus
database is not maintained by an commercial entity working 24/7 on it.
Nearly all commercial AV Vendors offer Li
I was just looking at the sources.list file on our Debian server and I
realized we had unstable sources. I would guess that I used unstable in
order to get Samba 3, which maybe wasn't available in testing at the
time. But I don't know. Anyhow, I would rather be using testing. So, is
it rather p
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:47:06PM -0500, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> I am experimenting with Debian 3.0r1 and have a Visualize C3700 workstation.
You might have better luck trying to install Sarge (testing):
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Use the "netinst CD image, with Debian b
the point you are missing will is that OT is not such an anathema to
everyone as it is to you.
The only thing that gets my goat on lists is when people complain about
OT or ask people to take things off list.
lists are first about community. The value of spontaneous community
fosters the value
richard writes:
> Funny how few complained...
Many of us just killfile anyone who posts about politics.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2004-11-16, Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:21:30PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> But F-Prot sucks by default because it is nonfree. Check out clamav
>> instead. http://www.clamav.net/
> Well and to close the circle clamav sucks by default cause the virus
Ivan Wills wrote:
Hi
I want to set up apache with some virtual hosts with different IP
addresses and only have one NIC in the machine. Does any know how to
bind more than one IP address to a NIC?
Thanks
Ivan
Thanks all for the help it works a treat
Ivan
--
,###'
*##/ Ivan Wills
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:46:58PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> Yes, OT is interesting, OT is fun. "All work and no play makes Jack a
> dull boy," they used to say. That was before SATs and all that. But
> now I am OOT. Or EMOT.
OT isn't fun when it's controversial and about politics.
OT is
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:41:10PM -0500, Rick Friedman wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Will Ness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>F-Prot is a good linux anti-virus for linux. Spyware, you got me, but
> >>as earlier posters said, be sma
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:59:11PM -0600, Russ Cook wrote:
> Will the linux-* source files compile and build properly using
> the kernel-package tools?
Yes, they do. I use them on my own machines. I usually download the
bz2 kernel and compile from there. I'm not sure what the debian patches
to
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:10:51 +
Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 November 2004 20:24, William Ballard wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:12:56PM -0600, Rich Wellner wrote:
> > > Just as you did? ;-)
> >
> > Yes, just as I did. By the way, to swing this back on topic
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 22:38, William Ballard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:10:51PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > > Nobody wants to hear your opinion about George Bush in the context
of
> > > Free Software.
> >
> > I do.
> >
> > Funny how few complained...
>
> America and Iraq and
In short: I can't play ogg files on my Debian Sarge (2.4.27) machine,
but I can if I boot off a Knoppix live CD (v3.6, kernel 2.4.27).
i.e. the drivers I have installed on my Debian Sarge machine aren't
working. I'd like to set things up to use the sound drivers that
Knoppix uses, but I don't know
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:01:02PM -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
> My understanding of NFS permissions is that for any file appearing on
> an NFS share, the username/uid and groupname/gid mappings should
> (ideally) be identical on both the NFS client and the NFS server.
>
> So consider my home
I'm using grub instead of lilo. Do I append="apc=on" in the menu.lst file?
And where specifically in the file do i add this?
Wow, a question on this list that I know the answer. Guess I should answer
fast before somenone else do. :-)
Here is a part of my /boot/grub/menu.lst file:
title
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:23:11PM -0500, Keith O'Brien wrote:
> Didn't know about fish I'll have to check it out. I use shfs to mount
> via ssh/scp. Only problem I have had is with large file listings (such
> as mp3 collections). Juk and rythmbox both seemed to crash when using an
> shfsmounted fi
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:34:14AM -0800, Punit Ahluwalia wrote:
> I upgraded the kernel to 2.6.7, and successfully booted with the new
> kernel once.
> However, I had to compile the kernel again, to include some additional
> support. I cannot
> boot after compiling and installing the kernel the s
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 11:10:51PM +, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > Nobody wants to hear your opinion about George Bush in the context of
> > Free Software.
>
> I do.
>
> Funny how few complained...
America and Iraq and the whole lot of it doesn't have a single thing to
do with Debian. The ori
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:47:14 +0100
Alexandru Cabuz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying for a few days here to boot my brand new Athlon 64 box on
> a Sarge Installation CD. But since sarge is not yet ported to AMD 64
> (http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ports-status)
> I tried IA 64
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 15:21 -0500, Ben Russo wrote:
> (see below for long story background )
>
> The last time I created a large HW RAID5 volume (1.6 TB) the kernel was
> unable to see all of it... If I create several smaller block devices
> (like 400GB each) can LVM bind them together into a la
From: Richard Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Will Debian grow and stay?
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:10:51 +
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 20:24, William Ballard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:12:56PM -0600, Rich Wellner wrote:
> > Just as you did? ;-)
>
> Yes, ju
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:00 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
--snip--
> Just gzip each file down to < 1GB. Buy a couple 200GB hard drives and put
> them in an ordinary computer. Keep a years worth of data online.
--snip--
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:21:26PM -0500, Ben Russo wrote:
--snip--
> Please
Didn't know about fish I'll have to check it out. I use shfs to mount
via ssh/scp. Only problem I have had is with large file listings (such
as mp3 collections). Juk and rythmbox both seemed to crash when using an
shfsmounted file system.
http://shfs.sourceforge.net/index.html
Keith.
On Tue, 2
Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2004, 15:59 -0600 schrieb Russ Cook:
> I generally compile my own kernel using kernel-package and the
> kernel-source packages from the debian sites. But, at ftp.kernel.org
> are source files that are 2.6.9 vs 2.6.8.
> These files are labeled linux-2.6.9 vs kernel-source-2
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 20:24, William Ballard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:12:56PM -0600, Rich Wellner wrote:
> > Just as you did? ;-)
>
> Yes, just as I did. By the way, to swing this back on topic,
inability
> to focus on software and getting distracted with too many unrelated
>
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
