Re: new boot floppies

1996-06-03 Thread Bruce Perens
> Does this imply that dftp (or the functionality thereof) has been > merged into dselect? That would be good. There is an experimental package called dpkg-ftp which provides "dselect" with another "installation method" called "ftp". When you install this, you can select the "ftp" installation me

Re: new boot floppies

1996-06-03 Thread Bill Wohler
Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > dselect's FTP method Does this imply that dftp (or the functionality thereof) has been merged into dselect? That would be good. Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ph: +1-415-854-1857 fax: +1-415-854-3195 Say it with MIME. Maintainer of comp.mail.m

printing in debian/unix is hard...

1996-06-03 Thread Carlos Carvalho
I've already sent several bits of my printing tale. Here's the whole story... I discovered a few problems with apsfilter, as I already reported. Then I found that dvilj wouldn't take a dvi file from stdin, as required for automatic formatting so that you can just do lpr -Pprinter file.dvi. And no

modprobe messages about module net-pf: what are they?

1996-06-03 Thread Yves Arrouye
Hello, Since 1.99, I get messages like: Jun 4 00:03:50 marin modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-4 Jun 4 00:03:52 marin modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-5 in my daemon.log. Do you know what they mean? Thanks, Yves.

Bug#3203: bugs in apsfilter + patch

1996-06-03 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Package: apsfilter Version: 4.9.1-6 apsfilter considers a ljet4 and a ljet4l equivalent after setting the options to dvips. However if you send raw postscript to it this is a bug. The patch below corrects this, and a few more small glitches. It seems the authors haven't used PRINT_DVI very much :-

Bug#3202: dviljk doesn't read stdin!!! :-(

1996-06-03 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Package: dviljk Version: 2.5-3 cat file.dvi|dvilj - should work but doesn't. It complains of an invalid null option. I'm surprized to see such a bug :-( Here's a patch. --- dviljk-2.5/dviljk/dvi2xx.c Sun Jan 8 15:22:13 1995 +++ /home/carlos/dvi2xx.c Mon Jun 3 17:10:13 1996 @@ -1568,7 +15

reporting in on my new upgraded debian 1.1 beta installation

1996-06-03 Thread James D. Freels
I have recently upgraded my debian machine from 0.93R6 to 1.1 beta. I am happy to report that everything, except one important piece, is up and running and better than before! I had a few minor problems which have been reported earlier and were easily fixed: 1) /etc/crontab contained an incorrec

Re: Debian 1.1 man & more

1996-06-03 Thread Guy Maor
> Is there any reason the default PAGER on Debian should not be set to less > out of the box? less is not a base package, so might not be installed. more is one third the size of less, and it's very important to keep the base packages as small as possible. Guy

Re: problem with amd

1996-06-03 Thread Richard Allen
Richard J. Allen Telephone: 515-284-0209 Extension 121 Telephone: 515-284-0712 Extension 121 Bulletin Board System: 515-284-7006 Facsimile: 515-284-5147 World Wide Web Page: WWW.OPIS.COM Internet Mail Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Mail Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CompuServe

new boot floppies

1996-06-03 Thread Bruce Perens
New boot floppies are available in ftp://ftp.i-connect.net/debian/unstable/disks-i386/1996_6_2 . These will no doubt get to the mirror sites later today. Module configuration has been improved and dselect's FTP method might work once the base system has been installed (my test system didn't have a

Re: Debian 1.1 man & more

1996-06-03 Thread N. Salwen
Sorry for the confusion. It turns out that more is not the same as less on slackware but man automatically uses less without a variable set. I'm pretty sure it is not using a temp file. Is there any reason the default PAGER on Debian should not be set to less out of the box? Nathan

loadkeys problem w/ 1.1

1996-06-03 Thread Michael Callahan
I'm having trouble swapping the Control and Caps Lock keys on my keyboard. I have the following two line file that used to work with 'loadkeys' just fine: keycode 58 = Control keycode 29 = Caps_Lock Now however it just really messes up when control is pressed. It seems to stick in control mode

Error while rebuilding kernel

1996-06-03 Thread Paul Barrett
First, I want to thank everyone involved with Debian for doing an excellent job. I far prefer my Debian system at home to my current Sun or previous Ultrix systems at work. Three cheers for DEBIAN! Now my question. While trying to build a custom kernel under 0.93R6, I get an error about bootse

Re: Debian 1.1 man & more

1996-06-03 Thread Bruce Perens
You can define $PAGER as something like "cat >/tmp/$$;more /tmp/$$;rm /tmp/$$" to get the back-scrolling at the cost of somewhat reduced speed. You won't see the first page until the last has been formatted (which is why we don't do this by default). Bruce -- Pixar's Toy Story: Over 1/3 B

Re: How to handle new packages

1996-06-03 Thread Steve Preston
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian C. White writes ("Re: How to handle new packages"): >> > As I understand dselect, it looks at the Packages file to determine >> > the list of packages, their dependencies, and whatever else. >> > >> > Suppose I want to upgrade a single package

Re: PGP & MailCrypt

1996-06-03 Thread Derek Lee
I found MailCrypt in master.debian.org, under the debian/Incoming directory. Derek Lee

atrun problem fixed

1996-06-03 Thread James D. Freels
My problem was in the /etc/crontab file. This file apparently configures root cron jobs in addition to /var/spool/cron/crontabs/root. On another system that I configured from scratch, the atrun command was input correctly. On this system, which I configured as an update from 0.93R6, the command

Re: Unidentified subject!

1996-06-03 Thread Michael Meskes
Guy Maor writes: > >From atrun's man page: >atrun [-l load_avg] [-d] > > So make it 'atrun -d -l 0.5' or just 'atrun -d'. 0.5 is the default > anyway. And what's the exact reason for using using '-d'? Michael -- Michael Meskes |_ __ [EMAIL PROT

Installing 1.1 beta

1996-06-03 Thread Alberto Brizio
Well I didn't think it was easier to install 1.1 instead of 0.93 on my old PC, but if it is I'll try for sure. Wait for some days and you'll have a complete report of my work. Thank you (and all the other) for the suggestions. It was really kind. Alberto. -- Alberto Brizio ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

problem with amd

1996-06-03 Thread Nigel Williams
Dominik, I am hoping to get a large number of debian 1.1 systems running in our teaching laboratories next year. We use amd at our site. I have noticed a serious problem with amd as distributed. The code enabled by defining NEW_TOPLVL_READDIR is not well thought out. It does not take into acc

Re: Unidentified subject!

1996-06-03 Thread Guy Maor
On Mon, 3 Jun 1996, Michael Meskes wrote: > And what's the exact reason for using using '-d'? So that you'll get annoying mail every 5 seconds! Guy

Bug#3198: dviljk is still aout! :-(

1996-06-03 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Package: dviljk Version: 2.5-3

Re: Debian 1.1 man & more

1996-06-03 Thread Richard Lovison
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, Austin Donnelly wrote: > Those systems maybe format the manpage to a temporary file, then > use more to view that file. Debian's man put the formatted output > through a pipe directly to the pager, for speed. > > Note that you can also do: > > $ export MANOPT='-Pless'

Re: Debian 1.1 man & more

1996-06-03 Thread N. Salwen
Guy Maor wrote >> While using man to read a manpage I am not able to scroll backwards a page >> by using "b" or "^B". Has anyone else experienced this? My current >> version of man is 2.3.10-11. If I just use "more" to read a text file, >> everything works fine. > >more can't go backwards on uns

Re: Debian 1.1 man & more

1996-06-03 Thread Guy Maor
On Mon, 3 Jun 1996, N. Salwen wrote: > I tried this both man and more on my slackware system at home and they > both go backwards. I don't have the PAGER variable set. > > I realize this is slackware but I am surprised at the difference. As someone else pointed out, slackware man most likely wr

Re: PPP problem w/ 1.1 install

1996-06-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Amos" == Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amos> I'm still looking for this kernel-image package. Can't find it Amos> in the ls-lR files. It should appear in the mirrors soon, it was moved out of incoming recently. Amos> Now what about support for multiple kernels? Is it p

Re: Unidentified subject!

1996-06-03 Thread Guy Maor
On Sun, 2 Jun 1996, James D. Freels wrote: > Subject: Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> atrun -d 0.5 > ... > non-option arguments - not allowed: No such file or directory >From atrun's man page: atrun [-l load_avg] [-d] So make it 'atrun -d -l 0.5' or just 'atrun -d'. 0.5 is the default anyway.

Re: kernel headers

1996-06-03 Thread H.J. Lu
> > This has already been debated enough. Debian will continue to include > known-working kernel headers with libc unless and until that > arrangement proves to be unworkable. As I have time, I will continue > to encourage H.J. Lu and other Linux distributors to do the same. I still prefer to u

Re: big problems with installation

1996-06-03 Thread Amos Shapira
Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote: > My 0.93R6 system at home is the most stable linux system I have ever seen. > Now that 1.1 is nearly ready for release, I agree that it is approaching > the same level of stability. It is true that 0.93 probably is not > compatible with some of the newer hardware and sof

Unidentified subject!

1996-06-03 Thread James D. Freels
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: problem with debian 1.1 upgrade installation --text follows this line-- After my upgrade, the following messages is mailed to my root account exactly once every minute: Return-Path: Date: Sun, 2 Jun 96 22:02 EDT From: root (Cron Daemon) To: root Subject:

Re: PGP & MailCrypt

1996-06-03 Thread gli
On 2 Jun 1996, Joe Reinhardt wrote: > I uploaded a mailcrypt package last weekend, mailcrypt-3.4-1.all.deb. > Can you please tell me where I can find it. I check at one of the Debian mirror site eg. ftp://sun10.sep.bnl.gov, but cannot find it in the directory debian/unstable/binary/mail. If

Re: more trouble with 1.1 upgrade

1996-06-03 Thread Austin Donnelly
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Ian Jackson said: >> Scott Barker writes ("Re: more trouble with 1.1 upgrade"): >> > ok. So what happens when I install the new cron, and /usr/bin/savelog >> > isn't in >> > it? Won't dpkg remove it, since /usr/bin/savelog has been removed from >> > /var/

Re: problem with traceroute

1996-06-03 Thread Mark Eichin
Scott Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Interesting. I've had no problems at all with BIND... If you're running a 1.2.x kernel and an unstable bind, zone transfers from your machine will fail (because it attempts to get the ip options, something not supported in 1.2.x, and on failure drops the