* Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100906 23:24]:
> Thus the plan would be:
> 1. adopt mingw-w64 (I'll update #594371)
> 2. prepare binutils-mingw-w64 and gcc-4.5-mingw-w64 packages
> 3. update the mingw-w64 runtime (version 1.0 has been released)
> 4. update the wine-gecko 1.0.0 package
> 5. package
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100829 15:55]:
> > * Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100822 23:18]:
> > > * Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100820 00:02]:
> > > > The version of Wine Squeeze is going to ship with (1.0.1) i
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100829 15:55]:
> * Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100822 23:18]:
> > * Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100820 00:02]:
> > > The version of Wine Squeeze is going to ship with (1.0.1) is nearly two
> > > years
> > > old and for many users its use is great
* Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100822 23:18]:
> * Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100820 00:02]:
> > The version of Wine Squeeze is going to ship with (1.0.1) is nearly two
> > years
> > old and for many users its use is greatly limited. The recently released
> > stable version, 1.2, has va
* Ove Kaaven (o...@arcticnet.no) [100821 04:03]:
> 1. Get wine-gecko built on Debian. Apparently gcc-mingw32 4.4.4 did not
> solve all the problems with it, gcc-mingw32 would apparently have to be
> upgraded all the way to 4.5.0 to build a fully working package. Not sure
> if the release team
* Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100820 00:02]:
> The version of Wine Squeeze is going to ship with (1.0.1) is nearly two years
> old and for many users its use is greatly limited. The recently released
> stable version, 1.2, has vastly improved support for a large number of
> applications and games
Den 21. aug. 2010 10:55, skrev Stephen Kitt:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:02:37AM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Den 21. aug. 2010 03:01, skrev Svante Signell:
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! Peopl
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:02:37AM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Den 21. aug. 2010 03:01, skrev Svante Signell:
> >Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
> >distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
> >good! People are trying to help out!
>
> I would
Den 21. aug. 2010 03:01, skrev Svante Signell:
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! People are trying to help out!
I wouldn't hold much hope. These are the options:
1. Get wine-gecko built on D
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! People are trying to help out!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Dear release team,
I know what the answer ought to be at this stage, but I thought I'd ask
anyway; is there any chance whatsoever that, should updated packages of Wine
be ready soon (and satisfy the usual quality requirements), they could be
accepted into Squeeze?
The version of Wine Squeeze is g
11 matches
Mail list logo
