On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:16:10AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>...
> Note that for mipsel, this doesn't matter much, as llvm-16 isn't available
> either, and there are no firefox-esr/chromium/thunderbird builds there.
>...
FTR, firefox/mipsel died when a new ESR was no longer buildable
w
On 28/08/2024 18:13, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 11:16 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 25/08/2024 11:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Both the bullseye and bookworm builds fail on mips64el with:
File "/<>/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 1175, in
main()
On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 11:16 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 25/08/2024 11:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
[...]
> > Both the bullseye and bookworm builds fail on mips64el with:
> >
> > File "/<>/src/bootstrap/bootstrap.py", line 1175, in
> >
> > main()
> > File "/<>/src/bootstra
On 28/08/2024 11:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 25/08/2024 11:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 10:08 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On 24-08-2024 12:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Uploaded.
The package fails its own autopkgtest. Did something go wrong?
63s
On 25/08/2024 11:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 10:08 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On 24-08-2024 12:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Uploaded.
The package fails its own autopkgtest. Did something go wrong?
63s autopkgtest [22:00:29]: test create-and-build-crate
On Sun, 2024-08-25 at 10:08 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On 24-08-2024 12:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Uploaded.
>
> The package fails its own autopkgtest. Did something go wrong?
>
> 63s autopkgtest [22:00:29]: test create-and-build-crate:
> [---
>
Hi Emilio,
On 24-08-2024 12:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Uploaded.
The package fails its own autopkgtest. Did something go wrong?
63s autopkgtest [22:00:29]: test create-and-build-crate:
[---
63s Created binary (application) `hello` package
63s error: no suc
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 24/08/2024 11:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2024-08-24 at 10:27 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
This backports 1.78 from bookworm to bullseye. The changes are
minimal.
Again I haven't been able to build firefox against it yet
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1079515 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1079515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1079515 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
rustc-web/1.78.0+dfsg1-2~deb11u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1079515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2024-08-24 at 10:27 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> This backports 1.78 from bookworm to bullseye. The changes are
> minimal.
> Again I haven't been able to build firefox against it yet, as I'm
> having trouble with the FF build and OOM issues. Would be g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: rustc-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:rustc-web
Hi,
This backports 1.78 from bookworm to bullseye. The changes are minimal.
Again I haven't been ab
12 matches
Mail list logo
