Bug#1081553: transition: abseil

2024-10-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 12.09.24 um 20:12 schrieb Benjamin Barenblat: - libreoffice: too big to build on a porterbox, so left untested This is not the first time I see this claim. FWIW, I don't buy this. a) you only need -B b) /dev/mapper/vg0-srv  159G 48G  105G   32% /srv    and    $ cat /proc/cpuin

Re: Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue

2024-08-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 17.08.24 um 05:58 schrieb Aron Xu: After some research, I prefer making a t64-like transition for libxml2 for the following reasons: - Upstream is not prepared to bump the SONAME to something like libxml3. Given the long history of this function library, determining which APIs should be

Bug#1078537: unblock: libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3

2024-08-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: Deiban Korean L10N , Debian Accessibility Team Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice Hi, Please hint package libreoffice in (unblock is strictly speaking wrong here, but...)

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-06-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 17.06.24 um 20:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Apologies if I'm missing something, but +    - recommend kio >> 5.103.0-1 in -kf5 makes the package uninstallable on a default bookworm setup (i.e. Recommends are installed by APT). apt TTBOMK doesn't complain if a

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-06-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 17.06.24 um 19:05 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Sat, 2024-06-15 at 17:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Am 15.06.24 um 17:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 10:35 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'd

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-06-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 15.06.24 um 17:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 10:35 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'd like to fix 2 libreoffice bugs in stable. Most important is the SMB fix (which - for kf5 - also needs a kio stable update, but those can be do

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-05-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
;s subsumed in libmerged on 64bit archs anyway which we definitely + need to keep anyway (similar as libuuilo.so). +- recommend kio >> 5.103.0-1 in -kf5 + + -- Rene Engelhard Fri, 24 May 2024 21:06:45 +0200 + libreoffice (4:7.4.7-1+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=high * debian/

Re: Bug#1068609: libreoffice: FTBFS on arrmhf: testContentGnumeric assertion failed,- Expression: xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")

2024-04-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Version:  4:24.2.2-3 Hi, Am 07.04.24 um 23:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Filing a bug for reference. This is fixed in 4:24.2.2-3, will mark it as such when I get the bug number. As said. Regards, Rene

libreoffice: FTBFS on arrmhf: testContentGnumeric assertion failed,- Expression: xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")

2024-04-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: libreoffice Version: 4:24.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: trixie ftbfs Hi, Am 30.03.24 um 12:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard: That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway

Re: liborcus / boost1.83 and time_t

2024-03-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard: That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway) So we probably missed a rename? (Or more for stuff silently using time-date?) boost1.83 (iostream)? liborcus? Both? I

liborcus / boost1.83 and time_t

2024-03-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, I got qahelper.cxx:580:Assertion Test name: testContentGnumeric::TestBody assertion failed - Expression: xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument") Failures !!! Run: 64 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors: 0 make[3]: *** [/<>/solenv/gbuild/CppunitTest.mk

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 13.01.24 um 13:59 schrieb rhys: No. You are AGAIN assuming what I am talking about. Maybe because of how you write... I know the difference between a 32-bit processor and a 64-bit processor. Obviously you don't. Or at least are not aware about consequences. Since you still offer 32

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 07.01.24 um 04:38 schrieb Steve Langasek: The ordering here would be: - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default flags - the source packages which need an ABI change ("source-packages"+"lfs-and-depends-time_t") and do not already have versions in e

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 07.01.24 um 02:01 schrieb Steve Langasek: If you say you are going to fix eventual breakage (and not ignoring the test results!) and if that means fixing asm on all affected archs, then it's OK :) Well, yes; though I hope we would see some help from e.g. arm porters if there were actual

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek: - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default flags [...] What about the suggestion to not push changes to experimental for packages that already have new versions in experimental, and do the binary package renames

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi Steve, Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek: - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default flags I  think at that point in time one should know what breaks and whatnot. Archive rebuild? (Probably in stages) What kind of breakage are you looking to

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.01.24 um 09:17 schrieb Steve Langasek: - Packages that could not be analyzed for whatever reason are still assumed to have an ABI that's sensitive to time_t and have to be included in the transition. Happily, due to improvements in this run of the number of packages that coul

Bug#1059535: transition: abseil

2023-12-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 27.12.23 um 19:15 schrieb Benjamin Barenblat: Although doing a transition now will break some packages in sid, I believe waiting is likely to cause more issues. Upstreams (LibreOffice in particular) are starting to use features from the new version of Abseil, Actually it's not LibreOffi

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-07-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 17.07.23 um 19:35 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 17.07.23 um 19:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: Hi, With the FTBFS of mipsel/mip64el in sid we need to make a choice before the weekend:   - defer libreoffice update until 12.2, probably some time in the Autumn   - propogate 4

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-07-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 17.07.23 um 19:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: Hi, With the FTBFS of mipsel/mip64el in sid we need to make a choice before the weekend: - defer libreoffice update until 12.2, probably some time in the Autumn - propogate 4:7.4.7-1 to sid on those architectures, and testing on all

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-07-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 12.07.23 um 23:01 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: Control: tag -1 confirmed [...] The version is fine. It may or may not make it into 12.1 depending on build times; we'll do our best. Uploaded, thanks. Regards, Rene

Bug#1028132: now ready

2023-06-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 27.06.23 um 00:15 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: On 2023-06-18 13:57:01 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, hunspell-dict-ko was fixed/worked around the issue (0.7.94-1) so we can do this now. As said it's a no-op for anything except r-cran-hunspell which also is prepared in experim

Bug#1028132: now ready

2023-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, hunspell-dict-ko was fixed/worked around the issue (0.7.94-1) so we can do this now. As said it's a no-op for anything except r-cran-hunspell which also is prepared in experimental together with hunspell itself. I might add a libhunspell-private-dev package later when I figured out how

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-05-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: libreoff...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice Hi, [ Reason ] Update to "current" version. (Latest version of stable branch) Same reasoning a

Bug#1035056: Disappointed

2023-05-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, an (in some way) outstanders point of view for this discussion. Am 16.05.23 um 09:37 schrieb x s: It’s really disappointing that the only reason for blocking Plasma 5.27.5 and Frameworks 5.104 is that there’s “too many packages”. It's disappointing that KDE people like this do not care at

Bug#1036766: unblock: libreoffice/4:7.4.5-3

2023-05-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
7.3.1-1s changelog +- fix typo in last upload (s/choosen/chosen/), thanks lintian + + -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 22 May 2023 18:00:45 +0200 + libreoffice (4:7.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium * fontconfig-2.14.1-no-RGB-stripes-layout-for-sub-pixel-rendering.diff: @@ -5,7 +19,7 @@ * debia

Bug#1033506: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u6

2023-04-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 01.04.23 um 20:54 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2023-03-26 at 14:23 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: This fixes "CVE-2022-38745. Empty entry in Java class path risks arbitrary code execution" just disclosed by Apache OpenOffice. Please go ahead.

Bug#1033506: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u6

2023-03-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/avoid-empty-java.class.path.diff: apply upstream patch +avoiding empty -Djava.class.path= (CVE-2022-38745) + + -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:04:55 +0100 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5) bullseye; urgency=medium * debian/patches/hrk-euro-default.d

Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81

2023-01-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 30.01.23 um 19:28 schrieb Anton Gladky: Just for the record. The full test rebuild has been done (thanks to Lucas!). Results and logs are here: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2023/01/15/ Just for the record: It definitely misses packages. Probably those which build-depend on boost but do

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
[CCing hunspell-kos maintainer ] Hi, Am 08.01.23 um 19:24 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new ones against the old one.) See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Blocks: -1 by 1028124 Hi, not a real transition but given that it involves Breaks: and a dependency bump with shlibs.local... hunspell 1.7.2 changed some *internal* headers. Unfortunate

Bug#1027298: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5

2022-12-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/hrk-euro-default.diff: default to EUR for .hr + + -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 27 Nov 2022 19:37:58 +0100 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4) bullseye-security; urgency=high * debian/patches/ZDI-CAN

Bug#1016706: marked as done (transition: GNOME 43 mega libsoup3 transition)

2022-09-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, What you just quoted was just the e-d-s part. There's s still https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libsoup3.html Regards, Rene

Re: Bug#1019724: warning: stray \ before - causes autopkgtest failure

2022-09-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 15.09.22 um 15:50 schrieb Paul Gevers: On 15-09-2022 09:26, Paul Gevers wrote: I am trying to schedule autopkgtests in unstable on amd64 for all source packages that have one. And the first results are coming in. I'm not sure how to proceed though, see below. Lucas, are you in the p

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 29.08.22 um 03:47 schrieb Benjamin Barenblat: Thank you so much for doing all the work to figure out what packages I need to binNMU! I’ll get the ppc64el tests fixed and take care of the binNMUs ASAP. You probably can't, the release team can do that, though. Please let me know if you (o

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, (last mail for this topic for now, don't worry.) Am 28.08.22 um 21:19 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Quick testing with apt-get -b source (except of libreoffice, which I only did to after the place where abseil is actually used) complete, so they thankfully all should just be bin-NM

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the reasoning why support for < 3.16 was drop

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 19:58 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 19:50 schrieb Rene Engelhard: b) is a uncoordinated transiition. libabsl20210324 -> libabsl20220623. # grep-dctrl -FDepends libabsl /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-amd64_Packages -sPack

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 19:50 schrieb Rene Engelhard: b) is a uncoordinated transiition. libabsl20210324 -> libabsl20220623. # grep-dctrl -FDepends libabsl /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-amd64_Packages -sPackage and for source packages: # grep-dc

uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 19:00 schrieb Debian FTP Masters: [...] Maintainer: Benjamin Barenblat Changed-By: Benjamin Barenblat Description:  libabsl-dev - extensions to the C++ standard library (development files)  libabsl20220623 - extensions to the C++ standard library Closes: 1008730 1012194 Chan

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am 28.08.22 um 18:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: which contained a cut and paste error I introduced when redoing it after deciding I do the version check again for complenetess' sake... That doesn't work either. EDS_CHECK_VERSION is not available from only libebook, we'd need libed

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 18:37 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 17:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 28.08.22 um 17:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the reasoning why support for < 3.16

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the reasoning why support for < 3.16 was dropped which makes the patch bigger). I now di

Bug#1016080: buster-pu: package libreoffice/:6.1.5-3+deb10u8

2022-08-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 25.08.22 um 21:05 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: To clarify here, are you suggesting that we should skip this change for buster? Yes, given that we'd need a further update even more tiny and the next release is the final one I don't think this warrants a full libreoffice build. Sorry for

Bug#1016413: pu bug for reference

2022-08-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 04.08.22 um 12:58 schrieb Rene Engelhard: just for reference: a stable update for this is requested in http://bugs.debian.org/1016413 oops, should have been gone to #1016420 obviously (too hot...) Regards, Rene

Bug#1016413: pu bug for reference

2022-08-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
just for reference: a stable update for this is requested in http://bugs.debian.org/1016413

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 31.07.22 um 12:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [ Reason ] It seems the volution adress book is broken since 2015 due to a evolution change. Apparently noone noticed until 2021, where I backported the patch but then actually forgot to request a stable update [ Impact ] It stays broken

Bug#1016413: Acknowledgement (bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3)

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
+ + * debian/patches/fix-e_book_client_connect_direct_sync-sig.diff: +as name says; from libreoffice-7-2 branch + + -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 31 Jul 2022 11:04:32 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2) stable; urgency=medium * debian/patches/hrk-euro.diff: add EUR to .hr i18n; diff --git a

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I split the evolution fix out of #1016037 since that one admittedly is a bit bug and can be debatable to unblock the HRK fix and the CVE updates in deb11u2. [ Reason ] It see

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2 (was: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1)

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
VE-2022-2630-6-7-add-infobar-to-prompt-to-refresh-t.patch: +fix CVE-2022-2630{5,6,7} + + -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:19:49 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=high * backport fixes from libreoffice-7-0 branch: diff -Nru libreoffice-7.0.4/debian/patc

Bug#1016080: buster-pu: package libreoffice/:6.1.5-3+deb10u8

2022-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 26.07.22 um 19:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: actually this is quite a small update for a big package. Should we really do it (and the default change)? Or should we assume people don't use LO from oldstable anymore and either use bullseye or the bullseye version backported to buster? F

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2 (was: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1)

2022-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 26.07.22 um 13:24 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [ Checklist ]    [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog    [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them    [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable    [ ] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable Update: [x] the

Bug#1016080: buster-pu: package libreoffice/:6.1.5-3+deb10u8

2022-07-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
rate to Calc and the Euro Wizard + + -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 26 Jul 2022 18:54:43 +0200 + libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7) buster; urgency=medium * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream fix to diff -Nru libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/patches/hrk-euro.diff libreoffice-6.1.5/de

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2 (was: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1)

2022-07-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
r.patch +debian/patches/0004-CVE-2022-2630-6-7-add-infobar-to-prompt-to-refresh-t.patch: +fix CVE-2022-2630{5,6,7} + + -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:19:49 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=high * backport fixes from libreoffice-7-0 branch

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1

2022-07-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
office (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2) stable; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/fix-e_book_client_connect_direct_sync-sig.diff: +as name says; from libreoffice-7-2 branch + * debian/patches/hrk-euro.diff: add EUR to .hr i18n; +add HRK<->EUR conversion rate to Calc and the Euro Wizard + + -- Re

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 15.04.22 um 08:57 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote: Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao language. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao language. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=263961306ede0656ebb7904034a2172615ce81d0 We could backport the needed stuff to 7.3. Ot

Re: Accepted nspr 2:4.32-2 (source) into unstable

2021-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 21.11.21 um 00:04 schrieb Debian FTP Masters: >  nspr (2:4.32-2) unstable; urgency=medium >  . >    * debian/libnspr4-dev.links.in, debian/control: Remove > xulrunner-nspr.pc, > which breaks libxmlsec1-dev (<= 1.2.33-1). At least thanks for adding the Breaks: directly. But can you p

Bug#1000299: Accepted nspr 2:4.32-2 (source) into unstable

2021-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, Am 21.11.21 um 00:04 schrieb Debian FTP Masters: >  nspr (2:4.32-2) unstable; urgency=medium >  . >    * debian/libnspr4-dev.links.in, debian/control: Remove > xulrunner-nspr.pc, >

Bug#998339: nmu: xmlsec1_1.2.32-2

2021-11-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu [ nss maintainer X-Debbugs-Cc'ed ] Hi, nss 2:3.72-1 uploaded this morning did: nss (2:3.72-1) unstable; urgency=medium [...] * debian/libnss3-dev.links.in: Remove xulrunner-nss.pc. [..

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 14:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Yes, it's slideshow. Transitions based on physics: Sorry, not transitions but animation effects in slideshows. Regards Rene

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am 05.09.21 um 14:37 schrieb Markus Koschany: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, dem 05.09.2021 um 14:21 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >> [...]But not for libreoffice, and libreoffice DOES use box2d since 7.1.x >> which is in testing. > > Sorry, I thought that was a copy&pa

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 14:37 schrieb Markus Koschany: > However I would consider not build-depending on a 2d physics > library like box2d. Usually this library is embedded in custom games because Yeah, libreoffice upstream also uses a internal code copy... > whenever there are changes to the librar

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 14:10 schrieb Markus Koschany: > Hello, > > Am Sonntag, dem 05.09.2021 um 09:48 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > [...] >> without any  coordination or a transition approved on debian-release. >> That a transition would be needed was viisble

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > caveexpress is the only other affected package - and (expectedly) > doesn't build anymore: > > [...] > > [20%] Building CXX object > src/modules/physics/CMakeFiles/physics.dir/DebugRenderer.cpp.o > cd > /

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > nmu libreoffice . ANY . -m 'rebuild against libbox2d2' ] > > nmu libreoffice . ANY . experimental . -m 'changelog entry/dep-wait expr.' ] Sorry, cut and waste.. nmu libreoffice . ANY . -m 'rebuild against l

uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 01:18 schrieb Debian FTP Masters: > [...] Maintainer: Debian Games Team > > Changed-By: Markus Koschany > Changes: >  box2d (2.4.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium >  . >    * Upload to unstable. >    * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.0. >    * Mark libbox2d-doc Multi-Ar

Bug#988906: unblock: libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4

2021-05-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
nfigured. Fix up + the symlink in postinst instead. (Closes: #985297) + + -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 01 May 2021 13:50:48 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/tests/control.in: *really* add libreoffice-writer dependency diff -Nru libreoffice-7.0.4/debian/control l

Bug#984790: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7

2021-03-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 13.03.21 um 19:57 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 13:26 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> +libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7) buster; urgency=medium >> + >> + * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream

Bug#984790: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7

2021-03-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
=medium + + * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream fix to +not leave a bare trailing : in PYTHONPATH as it causes unconditional +loading of encodings.py from . (closes: #984703) + + -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:13:24 +0100 + libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6) buster

Re: Bug#964613: liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:44:59AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Nevermind, I just remembered I have those "Debian Janitor" changes > pending. Will do a source upload. Done now. (And a new liborcus with bumped build-dep.) Regards, Rene

Re: Bug#964613: liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > @-release: please > > nmu libixion . ANY . -m 'rebuild with mdds >= 1.6.0 (closes: #964613)' Nevermind, I just remembered I have those "Debian Janitor" changes pending. Will do a source upload. Regards, Rene

Re: Bug#964613: liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
us is built with x, rebuild ixion with x first" (at least for this specific mdds version) which ttbomk is not possible to express. On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 01:02:58PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > It *does* work though with liborcus 0.16.0 which I just uploaded to NEW, > so we probably sh

Bug#960046: transition: sane-backends

2020-05-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 07:11:09PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > libreoffice Note libreoffice only Suggests it (and it dlopen()s libsane.so.1). A rebuild will change the Suggests since https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/a11f5b7381097ea0ae9a3e03db90

Bug#950918: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6

2020-03-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:18:34PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 11:06 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > #916846 was filed pre-buster but I have to admit I cheated against it > > being > > RC by merging the OpenGL transitions (it*s not a impo

Bug#950918: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6

2020-02-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
2019-10-31 18:26:41.0 +0100 +++ libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/changelog 2020-02-01 15:13:43.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6) buster; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/glm-0.9.9-ctor.diff: add from master, fix opengl slide +transitions with glm >= 0.

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 08:18:41 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > > Thanks, yes, that prevents the install of the "old" > > gobject-introspection with the new python3 from experimental. > > Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread rene . engelhard
Hi, Am 4. Februar 2020 23:27:13 MEZ schrieb Simon McVittie : >On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 at 21:20:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> root@frodo:/# g-ir-scanner >... >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner' > >This is fixed in 1.62.0-5 (#950267

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
trospection which was accidentially kept disabled after a python3.8 test rebuild... * re-enable building of the "test packages" (-smoketest-data, -subsequentcheckbase) -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 15 Dec 2019 10:29:19 + happened.) Regards, Rene

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:12:08PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:07:29PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > e.g. fontforge is still red in > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.8.html. > > > > >

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:07:29PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > e.g. fontforge is still red in > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.8.html. > > > > That means that a rebuild of stuff using fontforge in the build will > > just FTBFS since it will be called with python3.8

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 05:53:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > On 17-01-2020 23:28, Matthias Klose wrote: > > >> Please add a transition tracker to switch the python3 default to 3.8. > >

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 17-01-2020 23:28, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Please add a transition tracker to switch the python3 default to 3.8. > >> It's not > >> yet ready, however it would be good to see affected packages. Please copy > >> it > >> from

Bug#947397: transition: cppunit

2020-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 10:34:07PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 28-12-2019 11:21, Paul Gevers wrote: > > PS: @Rene, as gatb-core is a transition by itself, we'll proceed with > > cppunit after gatb-core migrates. > > Rene, please go a

Bug#947397: transition: cppunit

2020-01-01 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 10:34:07PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 28-12-2019 11:21, Paul Gevers wrote: > > PS: @Rene, as gatb-core is a transition by itself, we'll proceed with > > cppunit after gatb-core migrates. > > Rene, please go a

Bug#947397: transition: cppunit

2019-12-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 09:18:38PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Most packages just build-depend on it. A rebuild using ratt just works, > > except some totally unrelated failures: > > I'm not able to reliably parse this sentence. Can you please elaborate a > bit more on what you mean here?

Bug#947397: transition: cppunit

2019-12-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, Simple new (minor) upstream version. Most packages just build-depend on it. A rebuild using ratt just works, except some totally unrelated failures: gatb-core, libtorrent and rtorr

Re: Processed: found 939940 in 0.5.1+git20160404-1, tagging 939940, found 939950 in 5.0.0.2456-1, tagging 939950 ...

2019-11-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:09:49AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >>> found 939956 0.6.2-1 > >> Bug #939956 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:liblangtag] > >> liblangtag: fails to build with gtk-doc 1.32 > >> Marked as found in versions liblangtag/0.6.2-

Re: Processed: found 939940 in 0.5.1+git20160404-1, tagging 939940, found 939950 in 5.0.0.2456-1, tagging 939950 ...

2019-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 939950 - sid thanks Hi, On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:09:12PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > found 939956 0.6.2-1 > Bug #939956 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:liblangtag] > liblangtag: fails to build with gtk-doc 1.32 > Marked as found in versions liblangtag/0.

Bug#944002: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u5

2019-11-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 08:23:58PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2019-11-02 at 15:41 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > I think we should fix #943873 in stable since even though stable has > > PostgreSQL 11 people might use it against some other serve

Bug#944002: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u5

2019-11-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
; fix the postgresql driver with +PostgreSQL 12 (closes: #943873) + + -- Rene Engelhard Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:26:41 +0100 + libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u4) buster-security; urgency=medium * debian/patches/expand-pyuno-path-separators.diff. diff --git a/patches/Postgresql-12-no-adsrc.diff b

Re: Bug#943401: libreoffice C++ Unit tests failing since gcc 9.2.1-12 ((Failure instantiating exceptionprotector)

2019-10-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 935902 g++-9 affects 935902 libcppunit-dev found 935902 9.2.1-12 close 935902 9.2.1-16 thanks Hi, On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 03:15:10PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > The comment about cppunit made me look at the cppunit package to find > #935902, and yes, the test case is reproducible. So

Re: Bug#943401: libreoffice C++ Unit tests failing since gcc 9.2.1-12 ((Failure instantiating exceptionprotector)

2019-10-31 Thread rene . engelhard
Hi, Am 31. Oktober 2019 15:15:10 MEZ schrieb Matthias Klose : >And afaik there was no test rebuild for >bullseye >either. Accepted cppunit 1.14.0-4 (source) into unstable On July 26: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1049803/accepted-cppunit-1140-4-source-into-unstable/ Buster release was 3 wee

Re: Bug#943401: libreoffice C++ Unit tests failing since gcc 9.2.1-12 ((Failure instantiating exceptionprotector)

2019-10-31 Thread rene . engelhard
Hi, Am 31. Oktober 2019 15:15:10 MEZ schrieb Matthias Klose : >On 29.10.19 15:09, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> On 2019-10-29 13:09:46 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: >>> Am 29. Oktober 2019 12:49:44 MEZ schrieb Vincent Lefevre >: In case makefile magic triggers some rebuild, you can als

libreoffice C++ Unit tests failing when built with gcc >= 9.2.1-12 (Failure instantiating exceptionprotector) (was: Re: Bug#943401: libreoffice C++ Unit tests failing since gcc) 9.2.1-12 ((Failure ins

2019-10-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 943401 gcc-9 found 943401 9.2.1-12 retitle 943401 libreoffice C++ Unit tests failing when built with gcc >= 9.2.1-12 (Failure instantiating exceptionprotector) thanks On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 03:09:50PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > 1. Build smoketest with the old g++-9 / libstdc++6. I

Re: Bug#943401: libreoffice C++ Unit tests failing since gcc 9.2.1-12 ((Failure instantiating exceptionprotector)

2019-10-29 Thread rene . engelhard
Hi, Am 29. Oktober 2019 15:09:50 MEZ schrieb Vincent Lefevre : >On 2019-10-29 13:09:46 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: >> Am 29. Oktober 2019 12:49:44 MEZ schrieb Vincent Lefevre >: >> >In case makefile magic triggers some rebuild, you can also run the >> >generated executable directly (w

  1   2   3   4   5   >