Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fish
The package was blocked because of security issues which were
fixed by this version. The new upstream version is focused on
these fixes and the package if pret
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu webkitgtk_2.0.4-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against unstable glib"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:09 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 01:57:42PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > This is caused by midori using a symbol that was only exported for being
> > used in the test runner. I can't see how a rebuild would fix it, are
er to have
midori use proper API instead of possible =)
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Debian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hey,
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 15:19 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > I'm planning to upload the attached change to stable. It's a very simple
> > change with a rather big benefit to webkit users (fixes #57
orward.
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Debian Project
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 68e031a..353f4ed 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+webkit (1.2.7-0+squeeze2) stable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Gustavo Noronha Silva ]
+ * debian/patches/
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 15:20 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > I plan to upload webkit 1.3.x (soon to be 1.4.0) to unstable. What
> > this involves:
>
> How about changing the source package name at the same time? This would
> save a lot
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gnome-panel_3.0.0.1-1 . amd64 . -m "Build with newer libebook."
thanks
The system I built gnome-panel in had a too old libebook which broke
ABI meanwhile and the old ABI package is no l
upport for testing makes no sense at all, so
let's please stick to my request =). The "staging" of packages that
require the newer webkit on experimental has already happened, and it's
now time to push them to unstable.
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
--
To UNSUB
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I plan to upload webkit 1.3.x (soon to be 1.4.0) to unstable. What
this involves:
webkit now provides two parallel-installable libraries:
libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 and libwebkitgtk-3.0-0; the f
Hey,
I'm planning to upload the attached change to stable. It's a very simple
change with a rather big benefit to webkit users (fixes #578019). Let me
know if it's OK to go forward.
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Debian Project
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelo
ch (1.2.x). Red Hat is helping quite a bit with
this by providing a developer to work on pushing fixes to that stable
branch, btw, so things may improve upstream.
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
I built the package in a bad environment yet again - so it has
dependencies on experimental packages, sorry about that =(.
nmu webkit_1.2.4-1 . amd64 . -m "Built in bad environment (again)."
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package webkit
webkit 1.2.4 includes a large number of security fixes, and a
refreshed version of a patch 1.2.3 already has on it with the newer
version that is mor
side, so *shrug* =)
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Debian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hey,
I screwed up and built the latest webkit upload in the wrong chroot (I
blame pbuilder not liking me recently =)), so it needs a rebuild to be
installable in current sid without experime
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hey,
For some reason some people started experiencing crashes with
webkit-based browsers after upgrades these last two weeks. We could
not really understand what was causing it, and I was n
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 21:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 13:17 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > This week upstream released 1.2.0, which is planned to be maintained as
> > a stable branch for a while. I believe releasing with 1.2.x is the best
> &
(1.3.x) will be sent to experimental instead.
If there's anything that we need to deal with regarding transitions, or
anything else in addition to the RC bugs we currently have, please let
us know.
Thanks!
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Debian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 13:04 +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote:
> Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > The packages are now depending on versions of libopal and libpt which
> > are no longer available, which makes them (and, as a consequence,
> > gnome-desktop-environment) uninstallable
ns of libopal and libpt.'
thanks,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva
Debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
version, too. While I have no time to
be the responsible maintainer, I'm up for working with anyone who wants
to get those back into testing.
See you,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian Project
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Em Qua, 2007-03-07 às 19:38 +0100, Luk Claes escreveu:
> Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>
> [some explanations :-)]
> > I believe this is the kind of thing that should work alright for us to
> > have a great desktop by default, therefore I request this update.
>
> Un
Hello,
A user found a bug in libgksu which would lead it to work incorrectly if
the user asks it to save the root password in the GNOME Keyring (when
using su as backend) on a clean install - if they request gksu to store
the password in the keyring, the password would not be stored because
the de
Em Sáb, 2007-02-24 às 19:08 -0800, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> > update-manager (0.42.2ubuntu22-11) unstable; urgency=low
> >* debian/manual.tar.uu, debian/rules:
> >- install the Debian specific version of the manual
> > modified by Sven Arvidsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #410916)
.
Changelog:
update-manager (0.42.2ubuntu22-11) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/manual.tar.uu, debian/rules:
- install the Debian specific version of the manual
modified by Sven Arvidsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Closes: #410916)
-- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 20
ill understand the NMs deciding otherwise, and be happy with
it.
Thanks,
[0]: the only RC bug it had was related to the debian/copyright file
not being correctly written, which was fixed very quickly, and
one of the 2 important bugs was the mass-bug-filling for packages
to update
Em Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:21:06 +0100
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> * Gustavo Noronha Silva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070112 11:09]:
> > Other than that, the 1.0 release is basically stabilization of the
> > 0.9 series, which has been packaged for Debian all the way
ckaged for Debian all the way from 0.9a6.
I am available for any questions you might have.
See you,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org/ | http://kov.eti.br/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
u22-8) unstable; urgency=high
* pos/es.po:
- removed; incorrectly added to update-manager! should have gone to
update-notifier
-- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 26 Dec 2006[...]
On update-notifier:
As noted on the changelog above, the change should have gon
Ping on the request below? =)
Em Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:18:04 -0200
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> [not subscribed, please CC]
>
> Hello,
>
> ruledispatch has been removed from testing and, I believe, because of
> that turbogears and turbojson went ou
e nonsense, it is
> probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
> actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.
>
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.debian.org/ | http://kov.eti.br/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XB-Python-Version or both? I must confess I failed to see
a reason for XS-Python-Version, but I'm definately willing to include
them in my packages if you say they're both useful.
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~kov/
--
To UNSUBS
ure a binNMU scheduled by
the Release Team is possible, so if a different action on my part (such
as a manual binNMU or a sourceful upload) is required, please let me
know.
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://people.debian.org/~kov/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Em Ter, 2005-06-28 às 00:43 +0200, Andreas Barth escreveu:
> Hi, All,
Hey,
> As always, the full canoncial list of the RC policy for etch is available
> at http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt .
I feel there's too much redundancy there when taking debian policy into
account, is that redu
Hello,
I've uploaded all of the mentioned packages with basically translation
updates. I've done most changes on the -2 revision for all of those
packages, but had to upload a -3 for gksu and libgksuui1.0 because of
last minute updates for ca.po.
The only changes that are not related to the trans
Em Sex, 2005-05-13 Ãs 17:58 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:12:49PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > 2.6.4-3 is now in the pool and has been built by some arches already;
> > the changes are now only the ones refered to in the -2 changelog, w
Oi denovo,
Em Qua, 2005-05-11 Ãs 14:35 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu:
[...]
> All of the changes you mentioned were not intended and only happened
> because of missing or wrong commits on our SVN. My fault, I should have
> rechecked the diff's deeper than simply svn diff&
Em Ter, 2005-05-10 Ãs 17:34 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> Oi kov,
Oi Steve =)
> The diff also seems to contain changes not documented in the changelog,
> which look quite intrusive:
[...]
> Please explain what's going on with these changes, or (perhaps easier
> anyway) upload a package that r
Hello,
As with gconf2 I just uploaded gtk+2.0 2.6.4-2 fixing a documentation
problem related to its devhelp file and including a patch grabbed from
upstream's CVS to fix a sucky focus problem, following the main
maintainer's advice.
This later problem can be quite a big inconvenience for users of
[reposting as it seems my MTA was not being able to authenticate with
its smarthost]
Hi,
I just uploaded gconf2 2.8.1-6, which basically patches and installs the
correct version of gconf.devhelp, fixing #287686. I suggest it be
accepted into sarge as soon as it is built in all arches.
Thanks,
-
Hello,
I uploaded gksu 1.2.4 to unstable some days ago with severity low, but
it should have been uploaded with medium or even high because it fixes a
quite nasty bug which is still in sarge (#298387).
I'd like to ask that you override its urgency to medium so it will enter
sarge as soon as mipse
[Don't know if you're subscribed, sorry for the CC if you are]
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:26:01 +0100
Dave Beckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like the muine package[1] to be removed from testing because it
> is too outdated (0.5.3, May 2004) and the new version in sid (0.6.3,
But does this out
verwhere but on i386 and powerpc.
I guess it should specify these two archs in its Architecture: field,
then? I'm not sure snes9x will build on archs other than that, will it?
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://beterraba.no-ip.org/~kov
Debian Developer: http://www.deb
44 matches
Mail list logo
