exist) so that
we have to help them by generating work for many people and potentially
new upgrade problems for everyone – or if we declare them, existing or
not, a non-issue at least for the upgrade to trixie.
And on a sidenote: I would advise to reconsider interacting with dpkg
too casually – but luck is probably on your side in any case.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
able is known to exhibit the
required setup).
(I will write another mail in another subthread about the finer details
of what interacting with dpkg in an upgrade means and what might be
problematic if you aren't careful – in general, not just with aliasing)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
anything about it in src:apt
code wise, but I think we should at least fix the documentation to give
users a helping hand with these transitions.
Thanks for considering:
unblock apt-transport-tor/0.5
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
¹ I would offer points regardless, but I don't want
y, I guess 'domain knowledge' is involved as we wouldn't be
talking if libssl-dev would be a new mail-transport-agent. It would be
perfectly clear that it must conflict with the others even if there is
no technical reason for it given that the other mail-transport-agents
already confli
tter to get that huge diff out of the way first and deal
with these minor things later. We^WJulian will do as you prefer. ;P
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
h it is kinda unrelated to be honest).
The patch is attached there and as one-liney and 'safe' as the rest of
this bundle is supposed to be…
Thanks and best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.git/log/?h=debian/jessie
Thanks for considering an:
unblock apt/1.0.9.8
and best regards
David Kalnischkies (for the APT team)
commit d5cf8851753dde4f45bfd3b48fcdf34247a8752a
Author: David Kalnischkies
Date: Tue Apr 7 22:34:34 2015 +0200
keyids in "apt-key del" should be case
kins runs)
even through it managed to stay below the radar for months. The
regression potential is again non-existent, mostly because this fixes
a regression and back then this behaviour worked, it worked for ages.
Attached as usual 'git log -p' of the involved commits.
Best regards
pe for being a bit quicker on the response side again,
too, in case you have any concerns; otherwise I hope you enjoy the
upload as much as I do (thanks Michael!) and honor us with a:
unblock apt/1.0.9.5
Best regards & happy package management days
David Kalnischkies
commit e5ef23145f0dc6
or everyone following along looking for a diff, the final diff of
1.0.9.3 -> 1.0.9.4 is probably best viewed in chunks via git, e.g.:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/log/
Thanks & best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to 1.0.9.5 for now – just so you know.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
commit d94082d5b98cdc10f9bc71377229bb57489ffaab
Author: David Kalnischkies
Date: Mon Nov 10 17:21:57 2014 +0100
change codenames to jessie as stable POV in docs
diff --git a/doc/apt-verbatim.ent b/doc/apt-verbatim.ent
index
the backlog.
It wouldn't be secret if it could be easily found. In the end, it might
just be an euphemism for "a release assistant tried to blackmail me,
so I thought it is just to return the favor". ;)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
p!
(picture the sweet 16th year old apt with big wet eyes saying that)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] I don't want to sound bitter or throw dirt, but it feels kinda ironic
that apt is punished for providing a workinprogress shared library for
its dependencies while other tools do
s to unreleased packages)
So far from me about the current episode. Another episode is in
production, so if you are a fan of the show you can soon enjoy
another one … (sorry about that for the rest, but I get the impression
it is better to have multiple "small" compared to one giant blob).
unblock apt/0.9.7.6
Thanks for watching & best regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-unblock-0.9.7.6.diff
Description: Binary data
has already said is that derivatives can
override this option with a configuration file which e.g. Ubuntu does already.
(They don't ship [complete?] changelog files anymore as far as I know,
so the command is a bit more useful for them than it is for us here)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> David Kalnischkies, le Thu 30 Aug 2012 19:43:21 +0200, a écrit :
>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> > We could add a switch to apt-cdrom to copy all configured locales for
>> &
hing
"acquire::languages set" is a bit flaky through, so maybe just
if LANG != "C" OR files in /var/lib/apt/lists
(and "C.UTF-8" and "POSIX", right?)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian
en't in any way less supported than before by this.
The very same config option used since ever to disable the download of
Translation files is still supported. In a way, it is even better supported
as you have the option of getting right of -en, too, saving even more MB.
Best regards
Dav
lf as essential), so the solution we arrive at is more or
less the same - good to know that at least sometimes theory isn't disproved by
the implementation. :)
Scheduled for 0.9.7.5
ETA: After we know what will happen with 0.9.7.4 (#685155)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNS
work access to get packages from somewhere else…
Same case if s/he prefers to disable installation of recommends.
And with this back to the initial topic: Adding a recommends, okay?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caaz6_fbarunnd6olmrleamds95sujrtm5v9vavk3vsgr3ro...@mail.gmail.com
n a row by a backup-file, which is a bit silly …
Attached is a more complete diff (but still without translations),
but if you want the complete diff or if you have any additional questions
feel free to ask of course (just keep deity@ cc'ed please).
unblock apt/0.9.7.4
Thanks for your work & best regards
David Kalnischkies
unblock-apt-0.9.7.4.diff
Description: Binary data
of the suite is
potentially dangerous] and while we have a central place to switch the names
we would need to know them first …)
Thanks for your work & best regards
David Kalnischkies
unblock-apt-0.9.7.1--0.9.7.2.diff
Description: Binary data
o far and it includes two fixmes,
so it's more of a proof of concept to get the ball rolling…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies, who wanted to send that months ago…
P.S.: I am not subscribed to release-lists, so feel free to cc me. Thanks.
diff -ru debian-archive-keyring-2011.10.23/debian/ch
ected is the Acquire::GzipIndexes option (don't uncompress Packages
files and co but use them directly: Saves space, decreases performance).
Further more the method is used to check that the size of a file is not zero
in various places, so we have just luck that zero is the same everywhere…
Best r
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 21:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 19:58 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> Potential in this regard as it is save as long as only one section
>> is worked on in the apt-ftparchive generate run but as soon as
>> multiple sec
he issue with
mutt and debconf translations).
In the es case the translator fixed also two fuzzy strings - we could
remove this, but as one of the strings is the usage message of apt-get
(which had only a line-addition) we figured that it should be okay to
fix this as well, but we can revert this if y
2010/9/13 Michael Biebl :
> On 06.09.2010 22:54, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
>> A question which i have in mind since i read that the mentioned
>> packages are not compatible as they are in different namespaces:
>> Is this breaks just here to remove the package from the sys
Hi all,
2010/9/6 Julien Cristau :
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:35:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
>> As for hal-cups-utils, I’ve uploaded the fixed meta-gnome2, which has
>> been sitting in the SVN all the while.
>>
> Looks like that helped, I now get:
[snip]
(Julien and I had discussed it a
2010/8/27 Reinhard Tartler :
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 17:29:43 (CEST), David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
>> 2010/8/26 Reinhard Tartler :
>>> I'm still waiting for an answer on this question. Is this issue solved
>>> with the latest upload, or do you prefer me t
safely place bets on the possibility that it will break…)
We can consider this after squeeze then we have ~2 years of
testing before shipping it…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
nd at least part of the "problem"…
Fixing it would mean that debian-archive-keyring doesn't need gpg
to install the keyring in APT and APT just needs gpgv for apt-secure
dropping gnupg from important (at least in APTs dependency chain)…
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
P.S.:
/suggestion is welcomed)
I also want to emphasis that this is an ABI break - not an API
break, so in an ideal world all rdepends just need to be rebuild.
I tried this in the past weeks a few times with the bigger users²
and so far everything builds and works as expected.
Best regards / Mit
t is more
likely that it will eat your kids in an unwatched moment…
but it is hopefully possible to get at least the overall idea.
Best regads / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
e todo to give it a renewal)
Comments are obviously still welcomed.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
[0]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~donkult/apt/sid/annotate/head%3A/README.MultiArch
[1] http://bzr.debian.org/loggerhead/apt/apt/debian-sid/revision/1875.1.47
[2] http://l
34 matches
Mail list logo
