Your message dated Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:27:24 +0100
with message-id
<1283837244.18797.16.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#595894: unblock: libkqueue/0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #595894,
regarding unblock: libkqueue/0.9.2-2
to be marked as done.
Thi
On Di, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:42:05 (CEST), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr >= 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
>> Package 'libxul' requires 'nspr >= 4.8.6' but version of NSPR is 4.8.4
>> checking npfunctions.h usability... no
>> checking npfunctions.h presence... no
>> ch
Hi Philipp,
Philipp Kern wrote:
> Thanks for the bug report. Indeed the git-core package is broken on
> lenny/i386 since the last point release on Saturday. Sadly nobody caught
> that bug when the package was in proposed-updates. It's only i386, that's
> affected, because of oddities on the up
I've been packaging WebGUI [1] for over two years [2], maintaining
unofficial packages for Debian Lenny until it was impossible to run
WebGUI on it due to dependencies. Gregor (gregoa) has been my upload
sponsor and packaging mentor, while Colin has been the main point of
contact with upstream, hav
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:16:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, September 6, 2010 04:24, Simon Horman wrote:
> > I would like the upload of 1.17.1-2+lenny1 considred.
> > My proposal resolves two bugs.
> >
> > * 595207: This is a fix for CVE-2009-3555 and enables
> > session re
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libkqueue
The version of libkqueue in unstable fixes bug #595648 which causes programs
that use libdispatch to stop working under certain circumstances. The
applie
tags 578358 +upstream,fixed-upstream
severity 578358 grave
thanks
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:18:57AM +, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Keys created / imported / having passphrase changed with gpg-agent
> 2.0.14 cannot be decrypted (and thus used), preventing all gpg
> operations. This has been fixed u
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny3_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny3_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quagga_0.99.10-1lenny3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing change
e.org
> Version: 1:3.2.1-6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100906 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
No. See below.
> During a rebuild of all packages in a squeeze chroot, your package failed
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ltsp-docs. it adds documentation for several features,
and removes duplicated documentation for the FRONT_VOLUME environment variable
(not mentioned in debian/changelo
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:56:05AM -0500, Adam Mercer wrote:
> Since the last update of git-core the templates in /usr/share/git-core are
> marked with permissions -rw-r- (owned by root:root), so general users
> can't access them. Therefore when a new repository is cloned the process
> failed a
On Mon, Sep 7, 2010 at 00:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 23:48:05 +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:56:19 +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
> > >
> > > > .../{support_uncompression => support_compression} | 69
> > > > +
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 595779 + moreinfo
Bug #595779 [release.debian.org] unblock: cvsd/1.0.20
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595779
D
Last time I wrote:
> But in qprogram-starter (version 1.4.0) I noticed that there was a
> problem with the message boxes and the second process. One Problem is
> that when some errors occured the wrong message boxes were shown. The
> other was that, if the second process had an error, it didn't sh
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:24:48 +0100
with message-id
<1283811888.14317.541.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#593861: future unblock:
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/0.2.904+svn842-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #593861,
regarding future unblock:
Your message dated Tue, 7 Sep 2010 00:20:19 +0200
with message-id <20100906222019.gr14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595777: unblock: pdftk/1.41+dfsg-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #595777,
regarding unblock: pdftk/1.41+dfsg-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 23:08:15 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Excerpts from Julien Cristau's message of Mon Sep 06 22:06:00 +0200 2010:
>
> [r842]
> > Uploaded (and ACCEPTED).
>
> Does that mean there's no chance of r858 [1] making it into Squeeze?
>
No, it means that I've uploaded r842.
Cheer
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 23:34 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:56:19 +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
>
> > .../{support_uncompression => support_compression} | 69
> > +--
>
> Care to provide a diff between the old and new patches? (I'm lazy, and
> deb
* Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100906 23:24]:
> Thus the plan would be:
> 1. adopt mingw-w64 (I'll update #594371)
> 2. prepare binutils-mingw-w64 and gcc-4.5-mingw-w64 packages
> 3. update the mingw-w64 runtime (version 1.0 has been released)
> 4. update the wine-gecko 1.0.0 package
> 5. package
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 23:44:34 +0200
with message-id <20100906214434.gp14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595798: freeze exception for dh-ocaml
has caused the Debian Bug report #595798,
regarding freeze exception for dh-ocaml
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock xpdf. It fixes a regression in 3.02-10 that a lot of
users are complaining about (bug #595547). It also fixes two other
non-intrusive minor issues. See attached de
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 18:13:59 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> Subject: unblock: cvsd/1.0.20
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
> Severity: normal
>
> Please unblock package cvsd. The 1.0.20 contains a fix for mixing IPv4
> a
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:56:19 +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
> .../{support_uncompression => support_compression} | 69 +--
Care to provide a diff between the old and new patches? (I'm lazy, and
debdiff doesn't know to do that.)
Thanks,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:06:35PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100829 15:55]:
> > * Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [100822 23:18]:
> > > * Stephen Kitt (li...@sk2.org) [100820 00:02]:
> > > > The version of Wine Squeeze is going to ship with (1.0.1) i
[Adam D. Barratt, 2010-09-06]
> So upstream have verified the result of 2to3 on their software?
yes
> On a related note, will the build system allow for the result of 2to3 to
> be easily overridden? For example, if whilst building an update the
> security team discover that there's a problem wit
Hi all,
2010/9/6 Julien Cristau :
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:35:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
>> As for hal-cups-utils, I’ve uploaded the fixed meta-gnome2, which has
>> been sitting in the SVN all the while.
>>
> Looks like that helped, I now get:
[snip]
(Julien and I had discussed it a
Excerpts from Julien Cristau's message of Mon Sep 06 22:06:00 +0200 2010:
[r842]
> Uploaded (and ACCEPTED).
Does that mean there's no chance of r858 [1] making it into Squeeze?
Sascha
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593861#44
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-sil
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Are there any particular changes which you think meet the current
> guidelines for freeze exceptions?
> fwiw, changelog entries such as "corrected quite a lot of things" and
> "fixed and modified many things" aren't particularly helpful when
> trying to pick changes out of
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:44:26 +0200
with message-id <20100906204426.gl14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595774: unblock: webkit/1.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595774,
regarding unblock: webkit/1.2.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:30:31 +0200
with message-id <20100906203031.gk14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595807: nmu: webkit_1.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #595807,
regarding nmu: webkit_1.2.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Processing changes file: smbind_0.4.7-3+lenny1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oshz6-0004g8...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 19:59:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 22:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 16:09:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > diffstat and debdiff follow. Most of the changes had been sitting in
> > git since May, but not uploaded
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
I built the package in a bad environment yet again - so it has
dependencies on experimental packages, sorry about that =(.
nmu webkit_1.2.4-1 . amd64 . -m "Built in bad environment (again)."
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 08:41:13 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> Am 03.09.2010 17:07, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > you uploaded sks 1.1.1+dpkgv3-2 to unstable fixing an RC bug a few days
> > ago. Unfortunately that upload appears to have many non-critical
> > changes over the vers
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 11:05 +0200, Christian Metscher wrote:
> I'd like to request you to allow shutdown-qapps 1.4.3 into squeeze.
>
> There have been massive changes in both qshutdown and qprogram-starter.
Now is not the time to be making massive changes. Are there any
particular changes which
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 20:50 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Adam D. Barratt, 2010-09-03]
> > On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 00:44 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > > We plan to upload such NEW versions of Squeeze packages to experimental²
> > > (one of ftp-team members, who is a member of our team, will h
Package: release.debian.org
Hello, can we please have a freeze exception for dh-ocaml 0.9.6. It
contains essentially a documentation update (ocaml packaging policy),
but also two small bugfixes in tools distributed by the package. I know
that this is against the stricter rules posted by Neil on Fr
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 22:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 16:09:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> diffstat and debdiff follow. Most of the changes had been sitting in
> git since May, but not uploaded due to Raphael not having access to the
> hw anymore. I'm quite happy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 595765
Bug#595765: unblock: mrd6/0.9.6-3
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Thomas Preud'homme
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:41:05 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Please unblock package mrd6 as it contains a FTBFS fix for
> Debian/kFreeBSD. The full changelog is:
>
> * Make dl* functions available on all archs (Fix FTBFS on *BSD).
Pretty ugly, there are (non-debian) platforms with dlopen
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 20:37:36 +0200
with message-id <20100906183736.gg14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595623: unblock: orville-write/2.55-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #595623,
regarding unblock: orville-write/2.55-2.3
to be marked as done.
This means th
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 15:13:10 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Julien (Cristau), what if Julien V. does this? Would the package be OK
> for an unblock?
>
I'm just going through the changelog, not looking at the actual changes:
+ * Bump debhelper compat to 7
no
+ * Switched from dpatch to
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:16:55 +0100
with message-id
<1283797015.11864.256.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#595417: unblock: mknbi/1.4.4-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #595417,
regarding unblock: mknbi/1.4.4-7
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 595609 + moreinfo
Bug #595609 [release.debian.org] unblock: mailgraph/1.14-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 18:59 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/04/2010 05:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Finally, the version of the package in testing ships a German
> > translation and
> > includes /usr/share/doc/live-manual/live-manual.{html,{txt,pdf}.gz}
> > and /usr/share/doc/live-manual/
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:44:10 +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> diff -Nru ekeyd-1.1.2/debian/changelog ekeyd-1.1.3/debian/changelog
> --- ekeyd-1.1.2/debian/changelog2010-09-06 11:02:35.0 +
> +++ ekeyd-1.1.3/debian/changelog2010-09-06 11:02:35.0 +
> @@ -
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:25:55 +0200
with message-id <20100906172555.gb14...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#595705: unblock: pstack/1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #595705,
regarding unblock: pstack/1.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:15:06 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > Please unblock package orville-write
> >
> > This NMU of mine consists mostly of debconf translation updates (and a
> > debhelper compatibility level bump from 4 to 7, which I us
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:12:46 +0200
with message-id <4c85210e.40...@bzed.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#595780: unblock: gpsd/2.95-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #595780,
regarding unblock: gpsd/2.95-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package gpsd
The new package contains a patch which fixes some identation errors
in the Python modules and tools which could result in wrong/unwanted
results.
Unfort
Subject: unblock: cvsd/1.0.20
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal
Please unblock package cvsd. The 1.0.20 contains a fix for mixing IPv4
and IPv6 sockets regardless of the order of addresses returned by
getaddrinfo()
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock pdftk 1.41+dfsg-9.
This upload solves a bug that leads to not working pdf compression
support - one of the main features of pdftk.
For this, I extended the existing uncompre
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:32:34PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:09:50 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:00:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's accepted, pl
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 07:55:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 05:09:28PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > #595647 is the only outstanding issue (and it's not a regression,
> > just behaviour not matching documentation), and is just a two-liner
> > to fix.
>
> I uploaded
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:04:33 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As stated in another message, next upstream firefox release is scheduled
> > for next week. On top of (obviously) the upstream changes, I would like
> > to app
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As stated in another message, next upstream firefox release is scheduled
> for next week. On top of (obviously) the upstream changes, I would like
> to apply the attached debian changes, to both code and packaging.
If everythi
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It was green because I'd marked it as acceptable :-)
Thanks, I'd received the email before :-)
>> (unstable) mantis_1.1.8+dfsg-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED
> Unblocked.
Thanks again.
> Assuming that there's no need for a further upload of the package before
> 1.1.8+d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 595420 debian-release@lists.debian.org
Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
Owner changed from debian-l...@lists.debian.org to
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
> submitter 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Bug #5954
owner 595420 debian-release@lists.debian.org
submitter 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
owner 595422 debian-release@lists.debian.org
submitter 595422 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
owner 595423 debian-release@lists.debian.org
submitter 595423 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
owner 595424 debian-releas
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:35:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> As for hal-cups-utils, I’ve uploaded the fixed meta-gnome2, which has
> been sitting in the SVN all the while.
>
Looks like that helped, I now get:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
hal-cups-utils python-cupsutils
The foll
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package webkit
webkit 1.2.4 includes a large number of security fixes, and a
refreshed version of a patch 1.2.3 already has on it with the newer
version that is mor
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 13:54:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > owner 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
> Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
> Owner recorded as debian-l...@lists.debian.org.
> > owner 59
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 595420 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
Owner recorded as debian-l...@lists.debian.org.
> owner 595422 debian-l...@lists.debian.org
Bug #595422 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-config
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 595422 unblock: live-config/2.0.5-1
Bug #595422 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-config/2.0.4-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-config/2.0.5-1' from 'unblock:
live-config/2.0.4-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 595423 unblock: live-build/2.0~a26-1
Bug #595423 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-build/2.0~a25-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-build/2.0~a26-1' from 'unblock:
live-build/2.0~a25-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please conta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 595420 unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
Bug #595420 [release.debian.org] unblock: live-boot/2.0.3-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1' from 'unblock:
live-boot/2.0.3-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
retitle 595423 unblock: live-build/2.0~a26-1
thanks
live-build (2.0~a26-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Removing desktop-base entry in gnome-full list, already inherited
through the gnome-core list.
* Exiting with 0 in live-boot bug script.
* Updating debian-live homepage in various location
retitle 595422 unblock: live-config/2.0.5-1
thanks
live-config (2.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Disabling kaboom in user context.
* Using double-hashes as meta-comment sign.
* Updating standards version of example package to 3.9.1.
* Updating uinstall targets in makefile.
* Correcting
retitle 595420 unblock: live-boot/2.0.4-1
thanks
live-boot (2.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Daniel Baumann ]
* Applying patch from Luke Yelavich to instead of
mangling the main sudoers file in accessibility bottom script,
create a new file in /etc/sudoers.d and set permissions
a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package mrd6 as it contains a FTBFS fix for
Debian/kFreeBSD. The full changelog is:
* Make dl* functions available on all archs (Fix FTBFS on *BSD).
* debian/contro
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:09:50 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:00:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> >
> > > It's accepted, please unblock it.
> > >
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descripti
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 12:22:31, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 00:55:15 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > Please unblock package pstack as it fixes bug #360922 that makes pstack
> > useless. This bug has severity important and pstack satisfy the unblock
> > rules by bein
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:00:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
> > It's accepted, please unblock it.
> >
> You dropped the version from the nm-dev build-dep, was that intentional?
> (Arguably, since 0.6.2 is older than what's in
Hi,
At Adam's suggestion, I am placing my request for the migration of
ekeyd-1.1.3-1 to testing here.
The ekeyd source package builds three binary-arch packages:
- ekeyd
- ekeyd-uds
- ekeyd-egd-linux
These packages are not installed by default and are only of use to people who
own a Simtec
On Sun, September 5, 2010 22:13, sils wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Please go ahead with the uploads to stable and unstable, and let us know
>> once the packages have been accepted.
>
> (stable) mantis_1.1.6+dfsg-2lenny2 ACCEPTED, appears in green on [0]
It was green because I'd marked it as
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 07:51:59 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:11:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > I'm afraid I won't be back to Debian work for long. Do you suggest to
> > > upload your proposed package to sid? Is it a candidate for squeeze?
>
> > As for squeez
On Mon, September 6, 2010 04:24, Simon Horman wrote:
> I would like the upload of 1.17.1-2+lenny1 considred.
> My proposal resolves two bugs.
>
> * 595207: This is a fix for CVE-2009-3555 and enables
> session renegotiation to work with Thunderbird 3.1.
> This was resolve din
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 21:00:00 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Finally the first release candidate of docbook-xsl 1.76.0 has been
> released and I would like to get version 1.76.0 into Squeeze.
>
I'm a bit hesitant with this as docbook-xsl is used by quite a few
packages' build processe
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:36:58 -0400, Ralph Amissah wrote:
> Please unblock sisu 2.6.3-4, which contains code and documentation fixes
> contributed for Squeeze.
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:22:56 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> OK, these should be fine to go in now. Could you please unblock them?
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:25:48 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>
> >> So, I'm asking for a freeze exception for this package.
> >>
> > Ack, let us know when it's accepted.
>
> Expect is accepted now.
>
Unblocked, thanks for your work.
C
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
plymouth (0.8.3-8) unstable; urgency=low
[ Anisse Astier ]
* Adding fontconfig-fontconfig to depends.
[ Daniel Baumann ]
* Updating postinst script to deal with not just with empty but also
wit
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>
>> So, I'm asking for a freeze exception for this package.
>>
> Ack, let us know when it's accepted.
Expect is accepted now.
Cheers!
--
Sergei Golovan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:07:40PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 10:42 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > > The problem here is that nothing else on the system uses
> > > python-cupsutils. It's s-c-p itself that gets a bad score during
> > > dist-upgrade becaus
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 00:55:15 +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Please unblock package pstack as it fixes bug #360922 that makes pstack
> useless. This bug has severity important and pstack satisfy the unblock
> rules by being of priority optional.
>
The severity for 'makes this package usele
Hi,
My last upload removes the use of a deprecated "return value of new by
reference". Please unblock php-xml-parser to have the issue fixed.
Note that I'm preparing other fixes of the same kind that I already
spotted (namely, for libnusoap-php (that I will adopt since there's an
RFA after I piss
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:15:06 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Please unblock package orville-write
>
> This NMU of mine consists mostly of debconf translation updates (and a
> debhelper compatibility level bump from 4 to 7, which I usually
> included in my l10n NMus for the lenny->squeeze re
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:11:56 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi release team!
>
> I'd like to upload a new version of expect (5.44.1.15-3) which fixes
> one reported bug (see [1], [2]) and one unreported segfault.
>
> So, I'm asking for a freeze exception for this package.
>
Ack, let us know
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 10:42 +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > The problem here is that nothing else on the system uses
> > python-cupsutils. It's s-c-p itself that gets a bad score during
> > dist-upgrade because python-cupsutils needs to be replace by
> > python-cupshelpers. Aptitude fig
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:21:45 +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> It's accepted, please unblock it.
>
You dropped the version from the nm-dev build-dep, was that intentional?
(Arguably, since 0.6.2 is older than what's in lenny, that's not much of
an issue.)
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descrip
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:21:49 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I did a NMU and a QA upload two weeks ago, both fixing an RC bug, and
> today I wanted to send the request for unblocking these.
>
> However—lo and behold—both were unblocked over the weekend. Was this an
> automatic unblock
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:48, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:24:25 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 15:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > tools/ods-control.in looks like it should exit with an error if it
>> > doesn't like its command line arguments.
>>
>> I h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 595629 + moreinfo
Bug #595629 [release.debian.org] unblock: xmame/0.106-3.2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595629: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5956
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:24:19 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> unblock xmame/0.106-3.2
>
xmame (0.106-3.1 to 0.106-3.2)
Maintainer: Bruno Barrera C.
Section: non-free/games
272 days old (needed 10 days)
Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by freeze-except
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:25:06 +0200
with message-id <20100906092506.gi5...@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#594336: unblock: pdl/1:2.4.7+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594336,
regarding unblock: pdl/1:2.4.7+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:05:10PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:27:18AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Iustin,
> >
> > sorry for not coming back to you earlier.
>
> Not a problem, I was on vacation :)
>
> > On 08/07/2010 12:36 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > >Oh, these are old
Hi all,
I did a NMU and a QA upload two weeks ago, both fixing an RC bug, and
today I wanted to send the request for unblocking these.
However—lo and behold—both were unblocked over the weekend. Was this an
automatic unblock, because RC bugs were fixed, or a manual one? I'm just
curious, to under
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:10:28PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> clone 595473 -1
> Actually it's libunique that wants dbus unconditionally if compiled with
> dbus support. It does have other backends, too, but no way to catch
> this error or to set another backend at runtime. It thus breaks relate
Your message dated Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:15:20 +0200
with message-id <20100906091520.gh5...@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#595685: unblock: pam/1.1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #595685,
regarding unblock: pam/1.1.1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 07:38:56 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 23, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>
> > > * Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582)
> > The package doesn't appear to contain any changes to the init script:
> Oops... 0.20080125-6 is now ready for testing.
>
Unblock
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
