Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1008827 + pending
Bug #1008827 [kde-standard] KDE Applications 21.12.3
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1008827: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008827
umbrello_22.12.0-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
umbrello_22.12.0-3.dsc
umbrello_22.12.0-3.debian.tar.xz
umbrello_22.12.0-3_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 10:44:22 +0100
Source: umbrello
Architecture: source
Version: 4:22.12.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Change
meta-kde_136_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
meta-kde_136.dsc
meta-kde_136.tar.xz
meta-kde_136_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Dec 2022 10:38:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008827: fixed in meta-kde 5:136
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008827,
regarding KDE Applications 21.12.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 11:05:31 +0100
Source: meta-kde
Architecture: source
Version: 5:136
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Changed-By:
Hi!
As usual I'm a little bit behind this with emails, so I just saw this.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 at 08:48, Helmut Grohne wrote:
[snip]
> I'd like to get some reply from Patrick before moving forward with this
> though. And it would be super awesome if this could be included in
> bookworm, so time i
Hi all,
as I was mentioned in this discussion...
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 10:27:18AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> I would very much prefer (a). Now, as you said, timing is important
> here. Do we need a pass through NEW? If that's the case then that will
> need to happen af
Hi all!
(And sorry for the late response. debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org is a
list for bots, so I didn't get it in my inbox. It's better to use
pkg-kde-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net or @packages.debian.org.)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:43:06AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Can one of the Debian Qt
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libiod...@packages.debian.org, Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
Control: affects -1 + src:libiodbc2
I intend to orphan the libiodbc2 package.
The package used to be required by the KDE stack but it’s not the case
anymore since a couple of releases and so th
libkeduvocdocument_22.12.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libkeduvocdocument_22.12.0-1.dsc
libkeduvocdocument_22.12.0.orig.tar.xz
libkeduvocdocument_22.12.0.orig.tar.xz.asc
libkeduvocdocument_22.12.0-1.debian.tar.xz
libkeduvocdocument_22.12.0-1_a
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 22:17:57 +0100
Source: libkeduvocdocument
Architecture: source
Version: 4:22.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintaine
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1015619 - bookworm sid
Bug #1015619 {Done: Patrick Franz } [src:qt6-declarative]
qt6-declarative: ftbfs with LTO (link time optimization) enabled
Removed tag(s) bookworm and sid.
> tags 1015621 - bookworm sid
Bug #1015621 {Done: Patrick Fran
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 10:27:18AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> I would very much prefer (a). Now, as you said, timing is important
> here. Do we need a pass through NEW? If that's the case then that will
> need to happen after the next transition,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #1025663 [qmake6] qmake6: how should users query for QT_INSTALL_PLUGINS?
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1025663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
I agree that solution a) sounds like the better option, especially since
we've gone this route with Qt 5.
However, I will revisit this issue once we have transitioned 6.4 into
unstable.
--
Med vänliga hälsningar
Patrick Franz
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 20:07, Helmut Grohne wrote:
[snip]
> In any case, I've attached a patch for it now. It is based on what we do
> for qt5.
Thanks!
> I caution though that selecting version 5 or 6 is kinda messed up. If
> you run qmake6 or -qmake6, it'll use qt6 as expected. If you
> ru
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Dec 2022 at 20:36, Patrick Franz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree that solution a) sounds like the better option, especially since
> we've gone this route with Qt 5.
>
> However, I will revisit this issue once we have transitioned 6.4 into
> unstable.
It's up to you, but the patch is st
18 matches
Mail list logo
