Control: forwarded -1 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126992/
Hi Maximiliano,
On 05.02.2016 11:20, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> On 07/01/16 23:42, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> I'm wondering what the status of this bug is:
>
>> * Are you aware of the patch I provided?
> Sorry, I'm still trying to
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126992/
Bug #803813 [ffmpegthumbs] ffmpegthumbs: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126992/'.
--
803813: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803813
Deb
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0100 Maximiliano Curia
wrote:
> Version: 0.9.8-4
>
> On 08/01/16 19:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: libindi
> > Version: 0.9.7-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > libindi has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream
> > has released a new major ver
On February 6, 2016 2:31:02 PM EST, Diederik de Haas
wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0100 Maximiliano Curia
>
>wrote:
>> Version: 0.9.8-4
>>
>> On 08/01/16 19:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > Package: libindi
>> > Version: 0.9.7-1
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> >
>> > libindi has a build-depen
On Saturday 06 February 2016 14:35:56 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name?
> >Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for
> >libindi0b and libindi-dev on hurd-i386.
>
> That would do it. You might want to file a architecture
Package: kwin-common
Version: 4:5.5.4-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Checking the depencies needed to install kwin-x11 from experimental, there
is both a dependency on an un
On Sunday 07 February 2016 08:15:35 Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Checking the depencies needed to install kwin-x11 from experimental, there
> is both a dependency on an unavailable libkinglutil7 package and an existing
> libkwinglutils7 package.
And how is this different from bug #813701 ?
Where I also r
Diederik de Haas wrote on 07/02/16 08:33:
On Sunday 07 February 2016 08:15:35 Arthur Marsh wrote:
Checking the depencies needed to install kwin-x11 from experimental, there
is both a dependency on an unavailable libkinglutil7 package and an existing
libkwinglutils7 package.
And how is this d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 813938 normal
Bug #813938 [kwin-common] kwin-common: package in experimental has an incorrect
dependency name libkwinglutil7
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> merge 813938 813701
Bug #813938 [kwin-common] kwin-common: package i
severity 813938 normal
merge 813938 813701
thanks
On Sunday 07 February 2016 09:50:59 Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Sorry, all I read in that reply was:
> "even with the fixed libkwinglutils7 package"
>
> and the references didn't mention the libkwinglutil7 / libkwinglutils7
> issue in kwin-common.
>
>
Diederik de Haas wrote on 07/02/16 10:09:
severity 813938 normal
merge 813938 813701
thanks
On Sunday 07 February 2016 09:50:59 Arthur Marsh wrote:
Sorry, all I read in that reply was:
"even with the fixed libkwinglutils7 package"
and the references didn't mention the libkwinglutil7 / libkwi
On Saturday 06 February 2016 21:03:05 Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 06 February 2016 14:35:56 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > >Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name?
> > >Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for
> > >libindi0b and libindi-dev on hur
Your message dated Sat, 06 Feb 2016 23:27:27 -0300
with message-id <3780750.IMxBPOt63T@luna>
and subject line Reclosing with proper version
has caused the Debian Bug report #810436,
regarding libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
13 matches
Mail list logo
