koffice-i18n-af_1.5.2-1_all.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-af_1.5.2-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ar_1.5.2-1_all.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ar_1.5.2-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-bg_1.5.2-1_all.deb
to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-bg_1.5.2-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-br_1
koffice-l10n_1.5.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_1.5.2-1.dsc
koffice-l10n_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz
koffice-l10n_1.5.2-1.diff.gz
koffice-i18n-af_1.5.2-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-ar_1.5.2-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-bg_1.5.2-1_all.deb
koffice-i18n-
The recent upload of cupsys version 1.2.1-4 solved a problem (Bug#373839)
that shares the same symptoms as this bug. Please check that whether the new
packages solve the problem (the packages will hit testing in three days).
Regards,
Quim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Half of KDE and a number of other applications currently fail to build
with a message similar to:
| *** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60.
| *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
Before I file bugs on these packages, I wanted to check whether this
is a known problem and/or whether the n
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Half of KDE and a number of other applications currently fail to build
> with a message similar to:
>
> | *** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60.
> | *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
>
> Before I file bugs on these packages, I wanted to
This one time, at band camp, Ben Pfaff said:
> Does KDE use something other than "autoconf --version" to check
> the Autoconf version?
AUTOCONF_VERSION=`$AUTOCONF --version | head -n 1`
case $AUTOCONF_VERSION in
Autoconf*2.5* | autoconf*2.5* ) : ;;
Maybe not so forward compatible.
--
This one time, at band camp, Martin Michlmayr said:
> Half of KDE and a number of other applications currently fail to build
> with a message similar to:
[...]
> kst_1.2.1-1
This is fixed in -2.
Thanks,
--
-
| ,''`.
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-25 19:53]:
> > Half of KDE and a number of other applications currently fail to build
> > with a message similar to:
> [...]
> > kst_1.2.1-1
>
> This is fixed in -2.
Yes, the following packages have newer versions that fixed the bug.
I checked this befo
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:40 pm, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Half of KDE and a number of other applications currently fail to build
>
> with a message similar to:
> | *** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60.
> | *** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
>
> Before I file bugs on these packages,
Package: kdeedu
Version: 4:3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source because it doesn't recognize
Autoconf 2.60. A patch similar to
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/admin/cvs.sh?rev=555946&r1=543983&r2=555946
should fix this problem. For some background,
Package: kdegames
Version: 4:3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source because it doesn't recognize
Autoconf 2.60. A patch similar to
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/admin/cvs.sh?rev=555946&r1=543983&r2=555946
should fix this problem. For some background
Le mar 25 juillet 2006 21:15, Daniel Schepler a écrit :
> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 13:40 pm, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Half of KDE and a number of other applications currently fail to
> > build
> >
> > with a message similar to:
> > | *** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60.
> > | *** KDE re
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdesdk
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #379471
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131257
# * remote status changed: (?) -> UNCONFIRMED
usertags
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #364008
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103240
# * remote status changed: UNCONFIRMED -> NEW
usertags
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:55:42 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379691: kimagemapeditor: crash on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
15 matches
Mail list logo