On 2005-08-04 9:42:08 Waldo wrote:
> On Thursday 04 August 2005 00:42, Zack Cerza wrote:
> > So, I'm crossposting this to kde-licensing and k-c-d, because it clearly
> > belongs in the former, but I'm afraid nobody will see it there, just
> > judging by its archives. If that's inappropriate, I'm so
qt-x11-free_3.3.4-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
qt-x11-free_3.3.4-4.dsc
qt-x11-free_3.3.4-4.diff.gz
libqt3-i18n_3.3.4-4_all.deb
qt3-doc_3.3.4-4_all.deb
qt3-examples_3.3.4-4_all.deb
libqt3_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
libqt3-mt_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
libqt3-my
* Yves Glodt [Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:36:09 +0200]:
> A detail I'm interested about: Will Qt and KDE be compiled with the
> -fvisibility switch?
Not for the time being. We were presented a couple of nasty bugs
derived of its use, and we decided not to. It can be enabled when this
issues get fi
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 22:27, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Yves Glodt [Sun, 07 Aug 2005 21:36:09 +0200]:
> > A detail I'm interested about: Will Qt and KDE be compiled with the
> > -fvisibility switch?
>
> Not for the time being. We were presented a couple of nasty bugs
> derived of its use, and
libqt3-compat-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/q/qt-x11-free/libqt3-compat-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
libqt3-dev_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/q/qt-x11-free/libqt3-dev_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
libqt3-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/q/qt-x11-free/libqt3-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
libqt3-i18n_3.
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317768: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311562: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303065: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#268882: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#182366: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#282217: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290402: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305919: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317500: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319305: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
libqt3-compat-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/q/qt-x11-free/libqt3-compat-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
libqt3-dev_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/q/qt-x11-free/libqt3-dev_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
libqt3-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/q/qt-x11-free/libqt3-headers_3.3.4-4_i386.deb
lib
Package: kaddressbook
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Followup-For: Bug #266078
Hi,
why is this bug still open? For me, it looks like neither sid nor experimental
versions depend on libgnokii2 or libbluetooth1.
In my point of view, this should be marked as wontfix, and the dependencies
should be re-added. Ka
17 matches
Mail list logo
