Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-20 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On ketvirtadienis 13 Rugpjūtis 2009 23:34:01 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > It's in Multiverse in Ubuntu, which is their equivalent on non-free. It > could be packaged for non-free if someone cared to do it. Ok. I should have looked at packages.ubuntu.com first. -- Modestas Vainius signa

Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:39:32 +0300 Modestas Vainius wrote: >Hello, > >On treiadienis 12 Rugpjktis 2009 13:48:35 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> I just installed kubuntu on one of my boxes and found that they have >> nepomuk *usable* because they have been able to package and ship the >> sesame2 sop

Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:29:06 +0200 Ana Guerrero wrote: >I think we both, ubuntu and debian packages, are looking forward to see the >virtuoso backend. > Definitely. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-12 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:11:06PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Wednesday 12 Aug 2009 17:59:06 Ana Guerrero wrote: > > Are you talking about something you found in a PPA or other repo? > > Because ubuntu's soprano's package is quite similar to Debian's: > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou

Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Wednesday 12 Aug 2009 17:59:06 Ana Guerrero wrote: > Are you talking about something you found in a PPA or other repo? > Because ubuntu's soprano's package is quite similar to Debian's: > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/soprano > > There were some distribution problems not very clear with s

Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-12 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-08-12, Ana Guerrero wrote: > Also, take into account thata package something is not putting some files > under > debian/, ship it to the archive and forget. You have to look at the > different packaging policies (in this case java) and keep them updated, look > at all the build depends

Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-12 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:18:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi, > > I just installed kubuntu on one of my boxes and found that they have nepomuk > *usable* because they have been able to package and ship the sesame2 soprano > backend. > > >From what I remember, Debian KDE team didn't h

Re: libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-12 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On trečiadienis 12 Rugpjūtis 2009 13:48:35 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I just installed kubuntu on one of my boxes and found that they have > nepomuk *usable* because they have been able to package and ship the > sesame2 soprano backend. > > >From what I remember, Debian KDE team didn't have

libsoprano sesame2 backend

2009-08-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi, I just installed kubuntu on one of my boxes and found that they have nepomuk *usable* because they have been able to package and ship the sesame2 soprano backend. >From what I remember, Debian KDE team didn't have the resource to package it. Now that it is packaged for kubuntu, would it ma