Your message dated Sun, 26 May 2013 16:53:06 +0200
with message-id <3401610.CEa9poyJU8@adrien-portable2>
and subject line [koffice] cannot highlight or select text in text frames
has caused the Debian Bug report #621015,
regarding [koffice] cannot highlight or select text in text frames
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 699200 koffice/1:2.4.3+2
Bug #699200 {Done: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer }
[calligrastage] calligrastage: fails to upgrade from 'squeeze' - trying to
overwrite /usr/share/templates/Presentation.desktop
The sourc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 699193 ahven-dbg
Bug #699193 [libahven3-dev] libahven3-dev: fails to upgrade from 'squeeze' -
trying to overwrite /usr/lib/libahven.a
Added indication that 699193 affects ahven-dbg
> found 699200 koffice/1:2.4
Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:04:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#694397: fixed in calligra 1:2.4.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #694397,
regarding calligrawords-data: missing Breaks+Replaces: koffice-data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:
Selecting previously deselected package koffice-data.
(Reading database ... 6286 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking koffice-data (from .../koffice-data_1%3a2.2.1-4_all.deb) ...
Setting up koffice-d
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:17:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#677085: fixed in calligra 1:2.4.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #677085,
regarding fix conflict/replaces with old koffice names
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2012 09:48:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673464: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #671872,
regarding koffice: FTBFS ("error: ambiguous overload for 'operator<<'")
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2012 09:48:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673464: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #667229,
regarding koffice: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2012 09:48:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673464: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #665564,
regarding koffice: Including individual glib headers no longer supported
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2012 09:48:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#673464: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #662390,
regarding koffice: Please Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please removed koffice-l10n together with the removal of koffice (#673464)
Thanks,
Ana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please, remove koffice from the archive. The development of KOffice
is almost dead since most of the development team moved efforts
to Calligra.
For casual readers of this bug: note that Calligra is still not in
the Debian archive and might not to make
Adam D. Barratt (07/05/2012):
> koffice FTBFS having been binNMUed for the exiv2 transition. From the
> amd64 build log: […]
12:52:59 [ pinotree] will be hopefully replaced with calligra soon
12:53:52 [ KiBi] meaning it's going to disappear from the exiv2 transition
radar?
12:54:13
Source: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
Hi,
koffice FTBFS having been binNMUed for the exiv2 transition. From the
amd64 build log:
cd libs/odf && /usr/bin/g++ -DMAKE_KOODF_LIB -D_BSD_SOURCE -DSHOULD_BUILD_RDF
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -DQ
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #530977 (http://bugs.debian.org/530977)
# Bug title: kexi: bashism in /bin/sh script
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
Package: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid wheezy
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7
The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.7/g++-4.7, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.6/g++-4.6. The
severity of this report may be
Source: koffice
Version: 2.3.3-2
Severity: important
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: glib-single-include
Hi,
including invidiual glib headers has been deprecated for several years.
Starting with glib 2.32 it is now mandatory to include glib.h instead
of individual
Hi,
Alle domenica 18 marzo 2012, Steven Chamberlain ha scritto:
> Does koffice 2.3.3-2 just need a rebuild on hurd-i386?
Not with current pstoedit.
> >From the build log it seems the missing file "karbonepsimport.so"
> >wasn't
>
> built, because the d
Hi,
Does koffice 2.3.3-2 just need a rebuild on hurd-i386?
>From the build log it seems the missing file "karbonepsimport.so" wasn't
built, because the detection of pstoedit failed. That's probably
because hurd-i386 had only 3.51~pre1-1 at the time (but now has 3.60-2
Source: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.3-2
Severity: important
User: lib...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: libpng15-transition
Hi,
Libpng maintainers plan transition of libpng[0].
Version 1.2 is used for libpng of current debian, but will shifts
to version 1.5 in this transition.
Your package still does
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #516119 (http://bugs.debian.org/516119)
# Bug title: kexi crashes after import a
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.3.3-2_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:48:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#634135: fixed in koffice 1:2.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #634135,
regarding koffice: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #623394 (http://bugs.debian.org/623394)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
Source: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.3-1
Severity: important
Hello Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers,
We are transitionning from libjpeg62 to libjpeg8.
As mentionned on debian-devel-announce[1], please update koffice to
Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev instead of libjpeg62-dev.
The following Build-Depends was
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #600153 (http://bugs.debian.org/600153)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
in versions kword/1:2.3.3-1.
> fixed 618800 koffice/1:2.3.3-1
Bug #618800 {Done: the_koala_aven...@yahoo.fr} [kword] [kword] Kword crashes
when saving file
Bug Marked as fixed in versions koffice/1:2.3.3-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
618
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #600152 (http://bugs.debian.org/600152)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #516119 (http://bugs.debian.org/516119)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Your message dated Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:36:28 +0200
with message-id <201104151336.29054.adrien.grell...@laposte.net>
and subject line Done: Doesn't start: findServiceByDesktopPath:
Office/kivio.desktop not found
has caused the Debian Bug report #461432,
regarding I cant run any koffice
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #621015 (http://bugs.debian.org/621015)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
forwared 621015 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270201
Hi,
The bug is really annoying indeed… I have open a bug in the Calligra bug
tracker for it.
Thanks for reporting bugs,
Adrien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Package: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.3-1
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi !
I used koffice 2.3.2 and now 2.3.3 and I encounter the same issue with both.
I can create and manipulate text frames, I can write text. But each time I try
to highlight/select a part of
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:59:35 +0200
with message-id <201104051359.35982.adrien.grell...@laposte.net>
and subject line Done: kchart has circular Depends on koffice-libs
has caused the Debian Bug report #588952,
regarding kchart has circular Depends on koffice-libs
to be marked a
Hi,
The package koffice-libs doesn't depend on kchart since the version 2.3.1-3 (in
testing currently).
So I close the bug.
Thanks,
Adrien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.3.3-1_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:19:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618164: fixed in koffice 1:2.3.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #618164,
regarding koffice: FTBFS:
../../../kpresenter/part/ui/KPrHtmlExportDialog.h:26:20: fatal error: QWebPage:
No such file or
Accepted:
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.2-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.2-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.2-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.2-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.2-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.3.2-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n_2.3.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_2.3.2-1.dsc
koffice-l10n_2.3.2.orig.tar.gz
koffice-l10n_2.3.2-1.diff.gz
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.2-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.2-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.2-1_all.deb
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #600153 (http://bugs.debian.org/600153)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
En cette agréable journée du jeudi 31 mars 2011,
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit :
> Just in case, to do this send the mail to -submit...@bugs.debian.org,
> where is the bug number.
>
> It proves to be more useful than sending the mail directly to the submitter's
> address,
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 18:30:22 Ana Guerrero wrote:
[snip]
> So far, it is good, but you need to Cc' the reported of the bug or they
> won't get any email. Submitters do not get subscribed to bugs
> automatically:/
Just in case, to do this send the mail to -submit...@bugs.debian.org,
wher
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 03:12:08PM +0200, Adrien wrote:
> En cette agréable journée du dimanche 27 mars 2011,
> Ana Guerrero a écrit :
>
> > Hi Adrien, I am sorry I did not answer you before, I do not read this list
> > very often.
> >
> > As you might know, ko
En cette agréable journée du dimanche 27 mars 2011,
Ana Guerrero a écrit :
> Hi Adrien, I am sorry I did not answer you before, I do not read this list
> very often.
>
> As you might know, koffice is not going to be around a lot of time longer
> in Debian and it is going to
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:36:56PM +0100, Adrien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Debian, KDE and Koffice for a few years now. I recently
> saw that the maintainers of Koffice are looking for help :
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541691
>
> So I am o
Hi,
I have been using Debian, KDE and Koffice for a few years now. I recently
saw that the maintainers of Koffice are looking for help :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541691
So I am offering my help, as I am using kword, kpresenter and sometimes
krita, and I like these
Source: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[3]: Enter
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:48:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#613158: fixed in koffice 1:2.3.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #613158,
regarding koffice: FTBFS on armel: no matching function for call to
'qMin(double&, qreal)'
to be marked as done.
T
Source: koffice
Version: 1:2.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Excerpt from the build log at
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=koffice&arch=armel&ver=1%3A2.3.1-2&stamp=1297150006&file=log&as=raw
Accepted:
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-3_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-3_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-3_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-3_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-3_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-3_all.deb
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-3.dsc
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-3.diff.gz
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-3_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-3_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-3_all.deb
koffice-l10n-de_2.3.1-3_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.3.1-2_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Accepted:
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-2_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-2_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-2_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-2.dsc
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-2.diff.gz
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-de_2.3.1-2_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.3.1-1_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
Accepted:
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-1.dsc
koffice-l10n_2.3.1.orig.tar.gz
koffice-l10n_2.3.1-1.diff.gz
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.1-1_all.deb
Accepted:
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.0-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.0-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.3.0-1_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.3.0-1_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.0-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.0-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.0-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.3.0-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n
koffice-l10n_2.3.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_2.3.0-1.dsc
koffice-l10n_2.3.0.orig.tar.gz
koffice-l10n_2.3.0-1.diff.gz
koffice-l10n-ca_2.3.0-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.3.0-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.3.0-1_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.2.1-4_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #590204 (http://bugs.debian.org/590204)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #590204 (http://bugs.debian.org/590204)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #590204 (http://bugs.debian.org/590204)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #451603 (http://bugs.debian.org/451603)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
Your message dated Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:33:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590172: fixed in koffice 1:2.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #590172,
regarding koffice-doc-html should conflict with old kpresenter data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.2.1-3_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
On July 28, 2010, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Thanks for your bug, could you please tell me a few more details:
> - from what koffice version are you updating from?
> - what is the conflicting file?
>
> Ana
Hi Ana,
I'm checking my logs, and the old koffice version was 1.6.8-3
Hi Mark!
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:41:51AM -0300, Mark Small wrote:
> Package: koffice-doc-html
> Version: 1:2.2.1-2
> Severity: important
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> Today I installed the new version of koffice that just hit testing. I ran in
> to a small problem.
Package: koffice-doc-html
Version: 1:2.2.1-2
Severity: important
Hi there,
Today I installed the new version of koffice that just hit testing. I ran in
to a small problem. koffice-doc-html wouldn't install until I uninstalled the
old kpresenter data because they share a file. Perhaps
Your message dated Sat, 24 Jul 2010 06:48:17 +0200
with message-id <20100724044817.ga21...@ana.debian.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#589673: koffice-l10n: no migrate yet
has caused the Debian Bug report #589673,
regarding koffice-l10n: no migrate yet
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: koffice-l10n
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Do not allow translation migrate before the app.
Ana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
Package: kchart
Version: 1:2.2.1-2
Severity: important
Hello Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers,
There is a circular dependency between kchart and koffice-libs:
kchart :Depends: koffice-libs (>= 1:2.2.1-2)
koffice-libs:Depends: kchart
Circular dependencies involving shared libraries
Accepted:
koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-2_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.2.1-2_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.2.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.2.1-2_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.2.1-2_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.2.1-2_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
koffice-l10n_2.2.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_2.2.1-2.dsc
koffice-l10n_2.2.1-2.diff.gz
koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.2.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.2.1-2_all.deb
koffice-l10n-de_2.2.1-2_all.deb
Accepted:
koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.2.1-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.2.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.2.1-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-da_2.2.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-1_all.deb
to main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-1_all.deb
(new) koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.2.1-1_all.deb optional kde
Southern Catalan (Valencian) (c...@valencia) translations for KOffice
This package contains the Southern Catalan (Valencian) translations for all
koffice-l10n_2.2.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
koffice-l10n_2.2.1-1.dsc
koffice-l10n_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
koffice-l10n_2.2.1-1.diff.gz
koffice-l10n-ca_2.2.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-cavalencia_2.2.1-1_all.deb
koffice-l10n-da_2.2.1-1_all.deb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
koffice-dev_2.2.1-1_amd64.deb: package says section is kde, override says
libdevel.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug
KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official repository
at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
These packages will arrive to the official archive soon, but since I need to get
some time to update the copyright file and they include new debs (kformula
shape and kexi), they need t
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #397136 (http://bugs.debian.org/397136)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #397136 (http://bugs.debian.org/397136)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #522132 (http://bugs.debian.org/522132)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #522132 (http://bugs.debian.org/522132)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Your message dated Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:49:49 +0200
with message-id <201003290249.49633.ewoer...@kde.org>
and subject line Re: koffice: Needs to use poppler for Lenny
has caused the Debian Bug report #436163,
regarding koffice: Needs to use poppler for Lenny
to be marked as done.
This mean
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #573322 (http://bugs.debian.org/573322)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #522132 (http://bugs.debian.org/522132)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package koffice
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #396907 (http://bugs.debian.org/396907)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id
1 - 100 of 395 matches
Mail list logo
