Re: kdebindings-3.1.3 heading for sid

2003-09-05 Thread Riku Voipio
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:00:13PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: > On Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 22:45, Riku Voipio wrote: > > yes. gcj compiles them fine after you wield a bit of vi against > > acinclude.m4.in. kdebindings doesn't need libjvm.so or libhpi.so, > > so checking for those two files is k

Re: kdebindings-3.1.3 heading for sid

2003-09-03 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Mittwoch, 3. September 2003 22:45, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:49:44PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > I have a pretty much functioning kdebindings 3.1.3 ready for > > > sid upload, see the attached changelog f

Re: kdebindings-3.1.3 heading for sid

2003-09-03 Thread Riku Voipio
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:47:26PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:49:44PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > I have a pretty much functioning kdebindings 3.1.3 ready for > > sid upload, see the attached changelog for details. > Did you manage to get the java parts to compile u

Re: kdebindings-3.1.3 heading for sid

2003-09-03 Thread Chris Cheney
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:49:44PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > I have a pretty much functioning kdebindings 3.1.3 ready for > sid upload, see the attached changelog for details. Did you manage to get the java parts to compile using gcj? Chris

kdebindings-3.1.3 heading for sid

2003-09-03 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi, I have a pretty much functioning kdebindings 3.1.3 ready for sid upload, see the attached changelog for details. there a few questions still remaining: 1) maintainer is currently [EMAIL PROTECTED] I assume I should either NMU it or adopt it? If I adopt it, should I use my name for maintainer