Your message dated Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:06:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#917107: fixed in qtwayland-opensource-src 5.15.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #917107,
regarding qtwayland-opensource-src: Check if CMake files for plugins need to be
removed
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel/issues/2264
Bug #966405 [libopenbabel-dev] libopenbabel-dev: CMake files do not reflect
installation paths
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel/issues/2264'.
>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 05:45:02PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Isn't Qt5Gui_QWaylandEglPlatformIntegrationPlugin.cmake just a cmake file
> for finding a plug-in (and this other associated ones)? If that's the case
> then it's off no use for us.
Yes it is. Most probably I w
El lun., 18 mar. 2019 16:51, Dmitry Shachnev escribió:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 03:37:27PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
> Meyer wrote:
> > The correct fix for
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwayland-opensource-src/+bug/1806186
> > might be removing/patching cmake file for p
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 03:37:27PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> The correct fix for
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwayland-opensource-src/+bug/1806186
> might be removing/patching cmake file for plugins.
Just for the record, Qt’s mkspecs/features/data/cmake/
Source: qtwayland-opensource-src
Version: 5.11.2-3
Severity: normal
The correct fix for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwayland-opensource-src/+bug/1806186
might be removing/patching cmake file for plugins.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
AP
Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:38:41 +0300
with message-id <20180911073841.ga2...@mitya57.me>
and subject line Re: Bug#908558: qttools5-dev-tools: Missing cmake files in
package
has caused the Debian Bug report #908558,
regarding qttools5-dev-tools: Missing cmake files in package
Package: qttools5-dev-tools
Version: 5.11.1-5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
https://packages.debian.org/buster/amd64/qttools5-dev-tools/filelist
says that there should be
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt5LinguistTools/*.cmake files.
But there are no such files:
$ dpkg -l qttools5-dev
Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:19:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#793347: fixed in qttools-opensource-src 5.5.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #793347,
regarding CMake files for lupdate/lrelease should probably go in -dev-tools
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Source: qttools-opensource-src
Version: 5.4.2-2
Severity: normal
Felix pointed out on IRC that the CMake files for linguist, namely everything
under /usr/lib//cmake/Qt5LinguistTools/, should probably better shipped in
qttools5-dev-tools instead of qtbase5-dev.
The reason is simple: they are used
Hi,
> Files: cmake/*
> Copyright: UNKNOWN
> License: GPL-2+
more or less , yepp but with a corect copyright holders :)
> Licensecheck didn't bring any .cmake files even in tarball
> i use exists cmake directory.
The problem is that licenscheck do not search for cmake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Maximiliano hi,
I don't quiet understand what you mean for cmake files,
if you mean to add:
Files: cmake/*
Copyright: UNKNOWN
License: GPL-2+
Licensecheck didn't bring any .cmake files even in tarball
i use exists cmake directory.
Please
Your message dated Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:00:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#729602: fixed in qtbase-opensource-src 5.2.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #729602,
regarding Do not ship cmake files for finding where the SQL plugins are
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> A few moments ago I pushed qt5webkit to unstable, feel free to test it :)
> (you may need to wait for the next dinstall + mirror syncing to get it).
Hi Lisandro,
Sigil compilation works with the unstable packages. Thanks.
Yannick
--
> Linux is not
On Sunday 11 August 2013 18:06:03 Yannick Roehlly wrote:
> Hi Lisandro,
>
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Now if this happens in the rebuilt packages, please do fill a bug.
>
> OK, I'll do that.
A few moments ago I pushed qt5webkit to unstable, feel free to test it :) (you
may
Hi Lisandro,
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Now if this happens in the rebuilt packages, please do fill a bug.
OK, I'll do that.
Regards,
Yannick
--
La vida es agradable. La muerte es pacífica. Lo problemático es la
transición.
--- Isaac Asimov
--
To
On Saturday 10 August 2013 18:22:13 Yannick Roehlly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While compiling sigil, I noticed that for some Qt5 modules the private
> headers are not installed but are still referenced in the .cmake files.
>
> For instance, for libqt5webkit5-dev, when compiling
Hi all,
While compiling sigil, I noticed that for some Qt5 modules the private
headers are not installed but are still referenced in the .cmake files.
For instance, for libqt5webkit5-dev, when compiling sigil I have this error:
CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/cmake/Qt5WebKit
18 matches
Mail list logo
