Re: changes in Makefile.am

2004-04-13 Thread Zsolt Rizsanyi
Hi! Thanks for the quick answers to the both of you. On Tuesday 13 April 2004 12.00, Dominique Devriese wrote: > Zsolt Rizsanyi writes: > > If I try to rebuild the makefiles I get problems with *.moc > > autogeneration. > > I'm guessing that you only ran automake, and did not do "make -f > admin/

Re: changes in Makefile.am

2004-04-13 Thread Dominique Devriese
Chris Cheney writes: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Are there any guidlines on how to package a kde application where >> changes are necessary in one or more Makefile.am-s ? >> >> If I just leave the Makefile regeneration to the make process then >>

Re: changes in Makefile.am

2004-04-13 Thread Dominique Devriese
Zsolt Rizsanyi writes: > Hi! Are there any guidlines on how to package a kde application > where changes are necessary in one or more Makefile.am-s ? > If I just leave the Makefile regeneration to the make process then > it does not succeed because the automake version of the upstream > does not

Re: changes in Makefile.am

2004-04-13 Thread Chris Cheney
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote: > Hi! > > Are there any guidlines on how to package a kde application where changes > are necessary in one or more Makefile.am-s ? > > If I just leave the Makefile regeneration to the make process then it does > not succeed because

changes in Makefile.am

2004-04-13 Thread Zsolt Rizsanyi
Hi! Are there any guidlines on how to package a kde application where changes are necessary in one or more Makefile.am-s ? If I just leave the Makefile regeneration to the make process then it does not succeed because the automake version of the upstream does not match the version I have from