On Sunday 23 October 2005 16:50, Christopher Martin wrote:
> I haven't tried with KDE 3.5, but it shouldn't make a difference
> relative to 3.4.x. You may be able to workaround some of the issues
> on i386, but one sign of the underlying problems is that when built
> with gcc
> visibility=hidden,
On October 23, 2005 10:17, André Wöbbeking wrote:
> On Sunday 23 October 2005 15:01, Christopher Martin wrote:
> > [CCing debian-kde so people are aware of this issue's status]
> >
> > On October 22, 2005 10:47, Yves Glodt wrote:
> > > When KDE 3.5 will land in sid, will it this time be compiled wi
On Sunday 23 October 2005 15:01, Christopher Martin wrote:
> [CCing debian-kde so people are aware of this issue's status]
>
> On October 22, 2005 10:47, Yves Glodt wrote:
> > When KDE 3.5 will land in sid, will it this time be compiled with
> > hidden symbols (-fvisibility), or is it still conside
[CCing debian-kde so people are aware of this issue's status]
On October 22, 2005 10:47, Yves Glodt wrote:
> When KDE 3.5 will land in sid, will it this time be compiled with
> hidden symbols (-fvisibility), or is it still considered unstable?
Unfortunately, -fvisibility is still too buggy. The m
4 matches
Mail list logo
