Re: Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lauri Watts [Wed, 25 May 2005 14:10:45 +0200]: Hi Lauri! > Given that, I'll ask again what I asked yesterday: Excluding the man pages > this time, if the rest of them are out of date, and possibly break builds, > you are happy with your own repo, and they are not to be shipped, isn't this >

Re: Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-25 Thread Ben Burton
> Since Ben takes objection to my characterisation of some of the man pages, > let's leave them out of the equation. I have no doubt that you understand that documentation is time consuming, and also that it is a never-ending task since documentation needs to be continually revisited and checked

Re: Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-25 Thread Pierre Habouzit
> Since Ben takes objection to my characterisation of some of the man > pages, let's leave them out of the equation. I will mark up and add > to the KDE repo all the ones still left in the modules he mentioned > (which I note was something that had already been started.) Yes, Ben has written a lot

Re: Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-25 Thread Lauri Watts
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 11.22, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Mercredi 25 Mai 2005 10:17, Lauri Watts a écrit : > > The majority of the debian man pages are either  the output of > > help2man (heck, we could pretty much automate that, but what's the > > point), or say little more than "this is kfoo,

Re: Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-24 Thread Mihai Maties
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:04, Piotr Szymanski wrote: > Hi, > > Adeodato Simó (Monday 23 of May 2005 23:36): > >   modules for Debian (*)(*) have agreed that it'd be best if the source > >   tarballs provided by the KDE Project wouldn't include the debian > >   subdirectory that is present in its re

Re: Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-23 Thread Piotr Szymanski
Hi, Adeodato Simó (Monday 23 of May 2005 23:36): >   modules for Debian (*)(*) have agreed that it'd be best if the source >   tarballs provided by the KDE Project wouldn't include the debian >   subdirectory that is present in its repository. This is pretty much >   the general consensus among Deb

Re: Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-23 Thread Lauri Watts
On Monday 23 May 2005 23.36, Adeodato Simó wrote: > discuss possible solutions to improve the status of this, since we > want those directories to continue to have a place in the KDE > repository, and be actually useful. Why, exactly, might I ask? At one time in the distant past, there wer

Request from Debian packagers: please don't ship debian/ in tarballs

2005-05-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hello! After a bit of internal discussion, the people active in packaging KDE modules for Debian (*) have agreed that it'd be best if the source tarballs provided by the KDE Project wouldn't include the debian subdirectory that is present in its repository. This is pretty much the genera