On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:33:27PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 20:56:01 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> > State of browser support
> >
> > Debian Squeeze includes several browser engines which are affected by a
> > frequent
> > stream of security vulnerabilities.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 21:01:44 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Slightly modified (including the fact that there's in fact a LTS branch
> by Collabora and Red Hat):
>
Thanks, committed.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 20:56:01 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> State of browser support
>
> Debian Squeeze includes several browser engines which are affected by a
> frequent
> stream of security vulnerabilities. The high rate of vulnerabilities
> and lack of upstream support in the form of
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 08:56:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
[...]
> --
> State of browser support
>
> Debian Squeeze includes several browser engines which are affected by a
> frequent
> stream of security vulnerabilities. The high rate of vulnerabilities
[...]
I'm not a native
Hi,
as discussed before
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/08/msg01848.html)
we need to document the de-facto status of Squeeze browser support
in the release notes. Proposed text below.
Any objections and/or spelling improvements by native speakers?
[Webkit, Chromium and KDE maintainer
5 matches
Mail list logo