On Wednesday 09 February 2011 01.12:57 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Of course, we can simply orphan Qt 3, and hope somebody will step up to
> maintain it; we are unconvinced this is a responsible step for us to take
> as it would place the maintenance burden of a large package on
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 08:42:38 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I comaintain upstream qucs a simulator of electronics circuit and the
> only free one able to simulate radio frequency circuit.
>
> In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
> uptream lack ressource to port
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
Same for kpicosim, but I'm pretty confident that I can run qt3to4 on it
and simply link with qt4's qt3 support library.
Last time I tried, the whole process
Hello Eckhart,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:12:22PM +0100, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> I used the lists at http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and
> http://wiki.debian.org/qt3-x11-freeRemoval to file the wishes, complearn-gui
> was not on that list.
Please consider using attached crude script f
Hi Artur,
Am Montag, 22. November 2010, 13:44:51 schrieb Artur R. Czechowski:
> I would like to ask you if the process of submiting wishlist bugs about
> preparation to Qt3 removal is comleted.
Until one minute ago, I considered the process completed, yes.
> For example, I know one package which
5 matches
Mail list logo
