Re: Bug#748533: Processed: Re: still unable to print

2015-11-07 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Sat, Nov 07 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > I support that approach for most cases, but it doesn't scale for teams like > KDE that have only a small number of maintainers, an impressive amount of > packages and a large number of reported bugs (and a tremendous amount of > pending issues that s

Re: Bug#748533: Processed: Re: still unable to print

2015-11-07 Thread Maximiliano Curia
On 07/11/15 00:23, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > > Right, that's an upstream bug, I think it would be better if okular used > > qprinter directly instead of having a tweaked qprinter implementation, but > > that might not be feasible, hopefully upst

Re: Bug#748533: Processed: Re: still unable to print

2015-11-06 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
On Thu, Nov 05 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote: >> Just saying "install cups-bsd" is not actually a >> good solution to the problem. If for whatever reason the user doesn't >> have cups-bsd installed, they have no way to know that the problem is >> the lack of that package. In the interest of user

Re: Bug#748533: Processed: Re: still unable to print

2015-11-05 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Hi, On 05/11/15 06:43, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, Nov 04 2015, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Okular already Recommends cups-bsd, so reopening the bug that suggests it be >> added makes no sense. > Hi, Scott. I appreciate the response, but I still think we're missing > the point. The r