On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> > I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages?
> After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
> but
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490.
> > > This show a pure woody system that cann
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages?
After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
but also the following:
1) debootstrap woody
2) Install the following pac
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490.
>
> > This show a pure woody system that cannot be upgraded to sarge
> > using the recommended way witout basically
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages?
>
> I know KDE upgrade tests had been done at one point. Maybe someone on the
> KDE team can shed light on this problem?
At one point a kdelibs3-bin package was
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490.
>
> > This show a pure woody system that cannot be upgraded to sarge
> > using the recommended way witout basically
Hi Bill,
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I need to attract your attention on bug #310490.
> This show a pure woody system that cannot be upgraded to sarge
> using the recommended way witout basically removing KDE.
> This bug is 100% reproducible, but I have not y
7 matches
Mail list logo