Julien Cristau wrote:
> Care to elaborate?
As I understand it:
The Qt 3 part is a red herring. Bugs blocking removal of Qt 3 really
should _not_ be release critical as long as there is someone willing
to maintain Qt 3 itself. I'm not aware of an RFA, so...
As for the KDE 3 part: to avoid user
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 19:45:11 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:11:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> 1. lower the severity of these bugs to important or lower
> >
> > Yes please.
>
> Based on response from #debian-qt-kde that
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:11:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> 1. lower the severity of these bugs to important or lower
>
> Yes please.
Based on response from #debian-qt-kde that was a bad idea on
my part. Not wanting to spam people further, I'm leaving things
a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:11:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>
> > Work on that direction has already started some time ago, when Eckhart sent
> > those wishlist mails to the maintainers of the related packages.
> >
> > Please, see http://w
Hi!
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Work on that direction has already started some time ago, when Eckhart sent
> those wishlist mails to the maintainers of the related packages.
>
> Please, see http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and
> http://wiki.debian.org/qt3-x11-freeRemo
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 16:12:38 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Work on that direction has already started some time ago, when Eckhart sent
> those wishlist mails to the maintainers of the related packages.
>
> Please, see http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and
> ht
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 01.12:57 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Of course, we can simply orphan Qt 3, and hope somebody will step up to
> maintain it; we are unconvinced this is a responsible step for us to take
> as it would place the maintenance burden of a large package on
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 08:42:38 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I comaintain upstream qucs a simulator of electronics circuit and the
> only free one able to simulate radio frequency circuit.
>
> In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
> uptream lack ressource to port
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 16:12:38 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
[snip]
> Please, see http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and
> http://wiki.debian.org/qt3-x11-freeRemoval on how we were tracking each of
> this issues.
s/we were/we are/ :-)
--
Evite los parámetros estáticos
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 08:38:04 Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:29:11 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> > > severity 604260 serious
> >
> > Bug #604260 [src:abakus] Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
Same for kpicosim, but I'm pretty confident that I can run qt3to4 on it
and simply link with qt4's qt3 support library.
Last time I tried, the whole process
I comaintain upstream qucs a simulator of electronics circuit and the
only free one able to simulate radio frequency circuit.
In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
uptream lack ressource to port to qt4. At my workplace (university) we
are using a lot this kind of so
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:29:11 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > severity 604260 serious
> Bug #604260 [src:abakus] Preparations for the removal of the KDE3 and Qt3
> libraries
> Severity set to 'serious' from 'wishlist'
>
[snip
Hello Eckhart,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:12:22PM +0100, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> I used the lists at http://wiki.debian.org/kdelibs4c2aRemoval and
> http://wiki.debian.org/qt3-x11-freeRemoval to file the wishes, complearn-gui
> was not on that list.
Please consider using attached crude script f
Hi Artur,
Am Montag, 22. November 2010, 13:44:51 schrieb Artur R. Czechowski:
> I would like to ask you if the process of submiting wishlist bugs about
> preparation to Qt3 removal is comleted.
Until one minute ago, I considered the process completed, yes.
> For example, I know on
Hi,
I would like to ask you if the process of submiting wishlist bugs about
preparation to Qt3 removal is comleted.
For example, I know one package which depends on Qt3 and has no bug submitted.
The package is complearn-gui.
Regards
Artur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ
16 matches
Mail list logo
