Re: Packaging exiv2 0.27

2019-09-02 Thread Steve Robbins
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 7:25:52 AM CDT Simon Frei wrote: > I just filed an MR, as I guess it's simpler to access/review than just > pointing to a branch on my fork: > https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras/exiv2/merge_requests/1 Thanks, Simon! I've successfully built the latest DigiKam

Re: Packaging exiv2 0.27

2019-09-01 Thread Simon Frei
On 01/09/2019 17:49, Steve Robbins wrote: > > Two initial observations: > > 1. The version string is wrong; which I just noticed thanks to Salsa's > lintian > checks -- see the MR page referenced above That's on purpose to the best of my understanding of the processes (which comes from a bit of d

Re: Packaging exiv2 0.27

2019-09-01 Thread Steve Robbins
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 11:03:30 AM CDT Simon Frei wrote: > On 01/09/2019 17:49, Steve Robbins wrote: > > Two initial observations: > > > > 1. The version string is wrong; which I just noticed thanks to Salsa's > > lintian checks -- see the MR page referenced above > > That's on purpose to t

Re: Packaging exiv2 0.27

2019-09-01 Thread Steve Robbins
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 7:25:52 AM CDT you wrote: > I just filed an MR, as I guess it's simpler to access/review than just > pointing to a branch on my fork: > https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras/exiv2/merge_requests/1 Excellent. I have built it locally for inital packaging work with

Re: Packaging exiv2 0.27

2019-09-01 Thread Simon Frei
I just filed an MR, as I guess it's simpler to access/review than just pointing to a branch on my fork: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras/exiv2/merge_requests/1

Packaging exiv2 0.27

2019-08-31 Thread Steve Robbins
Hi, Simon Frei previously wrote about his efforts to package the newer upstream version. Is there anything preventing us from uploading to the archive? It would help me with digikam :-) Thanks, -Steve