Bug#920878: provide QMAKE in buildtools.mk [Was: Re: Bug#920878: provide a package name for lrelease-pro]

2020-02-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: retitle -1 provide QMAKE from dpkg's buildtools.mk Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev Hi Guillem, On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 12:33:36AM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:17:23PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > I'm left wondering whether we should ask Guillem to include Q

Processed: provide QMAKE in buildtools.mk [Was: Re: Bug#920878: provide a package name for lrelease-pro]

2020-02-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 provide QMAKE from dpkg's buildtools.mk Bug #920878 [qttools5-dev-tools] provide a package name for lrelease-pro Changed Bug title to 'provide QMAKE from dpkg's buildtools.mk' from 'provide a package name for lrelease-pro'. > reassign -1 dpkg-dev Bug #920

Bug#920878: provide a package name for lrelease-pro

2020-02-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:17:23PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I'm left wondering whether we should ask Guillem to include QMAKE in > /usr/share/dpkg/buildtools.mk. Once doing so, exporting QMAKE can be as > simple as: > > DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDTOOLS=1 > include /usr/share/dpkg/buildtools.mk > > or >

Bug#920878: provide a package name for lrelease-pro

2020-02-29 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Dmitry, On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:48:47PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > As we discussed on IRC, a separate package won't help much, as it cannot > declare a dependency on qt5-qmake:native anyway. The :native qualifier only > makes sense in Build-Depends. Details. It's technically possible,

Bug#920878: provide a package name for lrelease-pro

2020-02-29 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Helmut! Now I am working on packaging Qt 5.14, so I am returning to this bug. On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 04:52:53PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Control: retitle -1 provide a package name for lrelease-pro > Control: reassign -1 qttools5-dev-tools > Control: tags -1 = > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at