Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2019-01-13 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, There is no need to dump the abi as we are back where we were before. Sylvestre Le dim. 13 janv. 2019 à 09:31, Roman Lebedev a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:52 AM Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > > > Le 26/12/2018 à 21:30, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > > > > > >

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2019-01-13 Thread Roman Lebedev
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 12:52 AM Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > Le 26/12/2018 à 21:30, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > > > > Sylvestre: if I understand correctly (please correct me if I am wrong) > > you broke ABI without a transition. That's simply not good, you should > > now rebui

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-12-26 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 26/12/2018 à 21:30, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : Sylvestre: if I understand correctly (please correct me if I am wrong) you broke ABI without a transition. That's simply not good, you should now rebuild all rdeps. After the Qt transition is over, of course. This was a bug

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-12-26 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi Roman! On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 at 17:26, Roman Lebedev wrote: [snip] > BUT there are good news too. > After installing apt-build, and rebuilding qtcreator, it now works! Thanks for checking. > So the package needs to be re-uploaded/rebuilt for this to be fixed. > While there, maybe upload the 4.

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-12-26 Thread Roman Lebedev
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:36 PM Roman Lebedev wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:09 PM Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > Hello, > Hi. > > > Le 18/11/2018 à 20:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > > > clone 914002 -1 > > > reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 > > > affects

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-12-26 Thread Roman Lebedev
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:09 PM Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Hello, Hi. > Le 18/11/2018 à 20:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > > clone 914002 -1 > > reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 > > affects -1 qtcreator > > thanks > > > > El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 10:1

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-12-26 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Le 18/11/2018 à 20:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : clone 914002 -1 reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 affects -1 qtcreator thanks El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 10:18:03 -03 Adam Majer escribió: On 2018-11-18 12:30 p.m., Roman Lebedev wrote: If kit i

Re: Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 16:45:57 -03 Sylvestre Ledru escribió: > Le 18/11/2018 à 20:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > > clone 914002 -1 > > reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 > > affects -1 qtcreator > > thanks > > > > El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 18/11/2018 à 20:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer a écrit : > clone 914002 -1 > reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 > affects -1 qtcreator > thanks > > El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 10:18:03 -03 Adam Majer escribió: >> On 2018-11-18 12:30 p.m., Roman Lebedev wrote: >>> I

Processed: Re: Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 914002 -1 Bug #914002 [qtcreator] qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang Bug 914002 cloned as bug 914042 > reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 Bug #914042 [qtcreator] qtcreator's clang code model appe

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
clone 914002 -1 reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-7 1:7.0.1~+rc2-4 affects -1 qtcreator thanks El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 10:18:03 -03 Adam Majer escribió: > On 2018-11-18 12:30 p.m., Roman Lebedev wrote: > > If kit is clang (tried with both the clang 7, and llvm trunk), > > the parsing appe

Processed: Re: Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #914002 [qtcreator] qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 914002: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914002 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 10:09:59 -03 Roman Lebedev escribió: [snip] > > > I can't tell. > > > I don't remember when it was working for *certain*, > > > but i think it was working a week ago, and broke before yesterday. > > > > Well, that's an interesting dat

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Adam Majer
On 2018-11-18 12:30 p.m., Roman Lebedev wrote: > If kit is clang (tried with both the clang 7, and llvm trunk), > the parsing appears to fail, pretty much all the C++ std:: symbols > are underscored, and marked as not found. > ii libclang1-71:7.0.1~+rc2-4 The problem

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Roman Lebedev
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 3:18 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 09:04:27 -03 Roman Lebedev escribió: > [snip] > > > clang is now built with clang itself (stage2 build) since 7-5 > > > > > > Maybe this is the reason! >

Processed: Re: Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #914002 [qtcreator] qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 914002: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914002 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Control: tag -1 moreinfo El domingo, 18 de noviembre de 2018 09:04:27 -03 Roman Lebedev escribió: [snip] > > clang is now built with clang itself (stage2 build) since 7-5 > > > > Maybe this is the reason! > > I can't tell. > I don't remember when it was working for *certain*, > but i think it wa

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Roman Lebedev
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 2:57 PM Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Hello > > Le 18/11/2018 à 12:30, Roman Lebedev a écrit : > > Package: qtcreator > > Version: 4.7.2-2 > > Severity: important > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > If kit is gcc, the project (any fresh one i op

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello Le 18/11/2018 à 12:30, Roman Lebedev a écrit : Package: qtcreator Version: 4.7.2-2 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 If kit is gcc, the project (any fresh one i open) is parsed normally. All the symbols are resolved, and i can go to the definition. If k

Bug#914002: qtcreator's clang code model appears to be broken with kit = clang

2018-11-18 Thread Roman Lebedev
Package: qtcreator Version: 4.7.2-2 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 If kit is gcc, the project (any fresh one i open) is parsed normally. All the symbols are resolved, and i can go to the definition. If kit is clang (tried with both the clang 7, and llvm trunk