Hi Thomas,
> Maybe the solution is then not in rcc but in whatever generate the files
> that the qrc that rcc processes refer to. For instance in the case of
> ultracopier lrelease could have a mean if generating .qm files with the
> same modified timestamp as the .ts file it processes
That so
On April 3, 2018 10:15:42 PM GMT+01:00, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
wrote:
>El mar., 3 de abr. de 2018 16:42, Sune Vuorela
>escribió:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 9:24:58 PM CEST Chris Lamb wrote:
>> > I'm not /entirely/ sure what the difference is as I'm not in the
>> > Qt/RCC world
El mar., 3 de abr. de 2018 16:42, Sune Vuorela escribió:
> On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 9:24:58 PM CEST Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I'm not /entirely/ sure what the difference is as I'm not in the
> > Qt/RCC world too often these days (alas !), but why just not use
> > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH *iff* it is export
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 9:24:58 PM CEST Chris Lamb wrote:
> I'm not /entirely/ sure what the difference is as I'm not in the
> Qt/RCC world too often these days (alas !), but why just not use
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH *iff* it is exported?
>
> Normal systems simply do not have this envvar set, so ther
On April 3, 2018 8:20:22 PM GMT+01:00, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 9:14:23 PM CEST Chris Lamb wrote:
>> Hi Sune!
>>
>> > I don't think honouring SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is the right idea under
>normal
>> > circumstances
>>
>> Can you elaborate on what you mean by "normal circumstanc
Hi Sune,
> "normal circumstances" is rcc on a source file, as opposed
> to an autogenerated file
I'm not /entirely/ sure what the difference is as I'm not in the
Qt/RCC world too often these days (alas !), but why just not use
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH *iff* it is exported?
Normal systems simply do not
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 9:14:23 PM CEST Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Sune!
>
> > I don't think honouring SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is the right idea under normal
> > circumstances
>
> Can you elaborate on what you mean by "normal circumstances"? :)
"normal circumstances" is rcc on a source file, as opposed
Hi Sune!
> I don't think honouring SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is the right idea under normal
> circumstances
Can you elaborate on what you mean by "normal circumstances"? :)
How about e use S_D_E if it is setup/exported, otherwise use the mtime
of the file as before?
(This is the pattern/logic used ext
On Tuesday, April 3, 2018 8:46:51 PM CEST Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> The problematic files are Qt message files (ie .qm files) generated at build
> time via lrelease from translation files (ie .ts files). Therefore two
Right. I didn't think about autogenerated files during build.
> I think it wo
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 12:05:02 PM CEST Chris Lamb wrote:
> > While investigating ultracopier's lack of build reproducibility, I found
> > out that rcc encodes the timestamp of the files the QRC file being
> > compiled references
I don't actually see why this should be a problem. If input cha
On April 3, 2018 7:25:03 PM GMT+01:00, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>On Saturday, March 31, 2018 12:05:02 PM CEST Chris Lamb wrote:
>> > While investigating ultracopier's lack of build reproducibility, I
>found
>> > out that rcc encodes the timestamp of the files the QRC file being
>> > compiled references
Thanks for the bug! And sorry for the to posting :-(
I'll try to take a look into this.
El sáb., 31 de mar. de 2018 07:09, Chris Lamb escribió:
> Hi,
>
> > While investigating ultracopier's lack of build reproducibility, I found
> > out that rcc encodes the timestamp of the files the QRC file b
Hi,
> While investigating ultracopier's lack of build reproducibility, I found
> out that rcc encodes the timestamp of the files the QRC file being
> compiled references
Indeed, we've been tracking this for a while in the Reproducible Builds
project [0] but, without a patch, we did not wish to bo
Package: qtbase5-dev-tools
Version: 5.9.2+dfsg-12
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps toolchain
Hi,
While investigating ultracopier's lack of build reproducibility, I found
out that rcc encodes the timestamp of the files the QRC
14 matches
Mail list logo
