Bug#796956: Explanation

2016-01-20 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Tuesday 19 January 2016 11:12:06 you wrote: > Hi Bálint! > > On Monday 18 January 2016 10:38:05 Bálint Réczey wrote: > > Hi Lisandro, > > [snip] > > > 5.6.x is beta in experimental and I can't tell when it enters > > unstable. If it does not > > get uploaded to unstable in a few days with a g

Bug#796956: Explanation

2016-01-19 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi Bálint! On Monday 18 January 2016 10:38:05 Bálint Réczey wrote: > Hi Lisandro, [snip] > 5.6.x is beta in experimental and I can't tell when it enters > unstable. If it does not > get uploaded to unstable in a few days with a good chance of migrating > to testing > soon please upload a fix to

Bug#796956: Explanation

2016-01-19 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Lisandro, 2016-01-19 15:12 GMT+01:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez : > Hi Bálint! > > On Monday 18 January 2016 10:38:05 Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Hi Lisandro, > > [snip] > >> 5.6.x is beta in experimental and I can't tell when it enters >> unstable. If it does not >> get uploaded to unstable in

Bug#796956: Explanation

2016-01-19 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Diederik, On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 01:32:25PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Is it an idea to create meta-packages like qt5-xorg, qt5-wayland, etc? > Then if I want to have qt5 on an X system, I would install qt5-xorg and get > all things I need for that. > > It would also solve another 'probl

Bug#796956: Explanation

2016-01-18 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Monday 18 January 2016 10:38:05 Bálint Réczey wrote: > > So, strictly speaking, libqt5xcbqpa5 (which again should have been named > > as a plugin) is not a strict dependency, and thus the recommendation. And > > people not using recommendations should handle it by hand. > > Since a missing libq

Bug#796956: Explanation

2016-01-18 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Lisandro, 2016-01-15 15:16 GMT+01:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez : > severity 796956 important > thanks > > OK everyone this is really not a serious bug (actually I still don't think > this is a bug at all). I'll keep it open until we get Qt 5.6 into the archive > with a "fix". > > Let's star

Bug#796956: Explanation

2016-01-15 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
severity 796956 important thanks OK everyone this is really not a serious bug (actually I still don't think this is a bug at all). I'll keep it open until we get Qt 5.6 into the archive with a "fix". Let's start with the basics: sadly libqt5xcbqpa5 is a missnamed package. it should have been s