Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report
> about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just qt4-qmake
> generates linker call command. I think that it is the same as packages
> which are under automake/autoconf.
As others have said it befor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #reassigning and retitling back
> reassign 554694 src:goldendict
Bug #554694 [qt4-qmake] qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible
with binutils-gold
Bug reassigned from package 'qt4-qmake' to 'src:goldendict'.
> found 554694 0.9.0+svn
Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> reassign 554694 qt4-qmake
> retitle 554694 qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with
> binutils-gold
> thanks
>
> Hi, Peter.
>
> Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report
> about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just
Hello,
6 листопада 2009 о 09:32 +0300 Dmitry E. Oboukhov написав(-ла):
> Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report
> about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just qt4-qmake
> generates linker call command. I think that it is the same as packages
> which are under a
reassign 554694 qt4-qmake
retitle 554694 qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with
binutils-gold
thanks
Hi, Peter.
Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report
about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just qt4-qmake
generates linker call command. I t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 554694 qt4-qmake
Bug #554694 [src:goldendict] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Bug reassigned from package 'src:goldendict' to 'qt4-qmake'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions goldendict/0.9.0+svn404-1.
> retitle 554694 qt4-qmake generates
6 matches
Mail list logo
