Hello,
On šeštadienis 27 Vasaris 2010 18:30:18 Thomas Koch wrote:
> Debian Policy, 3.5:
> "For example, a dependency entry must be provided for any shared libraries
> required by a dynamically-linked executable binary in a package."
>
> % dpkg -S /usr/bin/sopranod
> soprano-daemon: /usr/bin/sopra
Hi,
> The facts are that:
>
> 1) libsoprano4 needs soprano-daemon for the library to be useful at
> runtime; 2) soprano-daemon is not supposed to be installed or directly
> used by users. I guess you are annoyed that soprano-daemon is not removed
> when you remove libsoprano4. But that's what
Hello,
On šeštadienis 27 Vasaris 2010 14:24:26 Thomas Koch wrote:
> Your statement is confusing. You're perfectly right, that soprano-daemon
> can not work without libsoprano4. Therefor I asked you, to put libsoprano4
> in the dependency list for soprano-daemon. You do even install binaries to
>
> On šeštadienis 27 Vasaris 2010 13:32:27 Thomas Koch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't believe, that eliminating the soprano-daemon -> libsoprano4
> > dependency is a solution. ldd shows, that the shared libraries included
> > in soprano-daemon depend on libsoprano4.
> > You should rather change the
Hello,
On šeštadienis 27 Vasaris 2010 13:32:27 Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't believe, that eliminating the soprano-daemon -> libsoprano4
> dependency is a solution. ldd shows, that the shared libraries included
> in soprano-daemon depend on libsoprano4.
> You should rather change the depen
Package: libsoprano4
Version: 2.3.1+dfsg.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I don't believe, that eliminating the soprano-daemon -> libsoprano4
dependency is a solution. ldd shows, that the shared libraries included
in soprano-daemon depend on libsoprano4.
You should rather change the dependency from libs
6 matches
Mail list logo
