Ben Burton writes:
>> This seems pretty fundemental to me. Are you saying that the KDE
>> CVS is not the place to get the most up to date version of the
>> debian subdirectories.
> It is the place for BRANCH, which is what's currently in debian
> unstable.
Actually, Chris told me he had forgo
> This seems pretty fundemental to me. Are you saying that the KDE CVS is not
> the place to get the most up to date version of the debian subdirectories.
It is the place for BRANCH, which is what's currently in debian
unstable. HEAD might be a different story; I at least haven't
looked at it
On Monday 29 December 2003 00:46, Chris Cheney wrote:
> The current debian/patches dir is only available in the diff.gz in the
> Debian archive. I seriously doubt any of the patches are even close to
> up to date in cvs HEAD.
This seems pretty fundemental to me. Are you saying that the KDE CVS i
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 11:16:10PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
> Building kdelibs with dpkg-buildpackage pumps out this error message when
> doing the patches at the beginning
>
> APPLYING PATCH:
> patching file kdm/kfrontend/genkdmconf.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 803 (offset 45 lines).
> Hunk #2
Building kdelibs with dpkg-buildpackage pumps out this error message when
doing the patches at the beginning
APPLYING PATCH:
patching file kdm/kfrontend/genkdmconf.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 803 (offset 45 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2289 (offset 213 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 2363.
Hunk #4 succeede
5 matches
Mail list logo
