It seems the broken Qt build has reached testing. So much for testing
being better for stability. I wants to upgrade from 5.9.2+dfsg-10 to
5.9.2+dfsg-12.
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:12:55 -0300
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> El lunes, 19 de febrero de 2018 08:04:24 -03 wm4 escribió:
> > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:54:11 -0300
> [snip]
> > Yeah, that is strange.
>
> *Too* strange. According to src/gui/ke
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:26:54 +0100
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2018-02-19 12:04:24 +0100, wm4 wrote:
> > Yeah, that is strange. I didn't create a new user, because that would
> > change nothing. I made sure to override all environment variables for
> > the test. I
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:10:02 +0100
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2018-02-18 15:25:35 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > wm4, Vincent: can you try setting QT_AUTO_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTOR=0 ?
>
> QT_AUTO_SCREEN_SCALE_FACTOR=0 works with -12, just like with -10.
>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 07:54:11 -0300
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> El 19 feb. 2018 4:15 a.m., "wm4" escribió:
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 15:25:35 -0300
> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>
> > I've been digging around and:
> >
&g
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 15:25:35 -0300
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> I've been digging around and:
>
> - One user (wm4, CCed) reported that the fix broke his setup. wm4: can you
> please test -12 with a new user without any change to any setup?
>
> - One us
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 12:47:04 -0300
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> El 16 feb. 2018 10:21 p.m., "wm4" escribió:
>
> This "fix" broke HIDPI scaling for me.
>
> Looking at the patch, this patch is just broken. Rounding up to
> nearest is correct
This "fix" broke HIDPI scaling for me.
Looking at the patch, this patch is just broken. Rounding up to
nearest is correct, because it means if you have a scale factor of
1. you end up with 2. With the patch applied, it scales to 1, which
is nonsense.
What the heck are you doing? Really?
8 matches
Mail list logo
