wv2_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2009-08-07 Thread Mike O'Connor
Hi Maintainer, I must REJECT this package because the debian/copyright file is inadequate, and there are several files which I doubt the freeness of. doc/Steely says: /* The W3C Core Styles Copyright (c) 1998 W3C (mit, inria, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document

Bug#520982: kdelibs: win subdirectory of sourcecode contains undistributable mix of GPL/BSD licenses

2009-03-24 Thread Mike O'Connor
reassign 520982 src:kdelibs thanks On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 07:18:41AM +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On Tuesday 24 March 2009 06:27:12 Mike O'Connor wrote: > > Package: kdelibs > > Version: 3.5.10.dfsg.1-2 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: dfsg #1 > &g

Bug#520982: kdelibs: win subdirectory of sourcecode contains undistributable mix of GPL/BSD licenses

2009-03-23 Thread Mike O'Connor
Package: kdelibs Version: 3.5.10.dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: dfsg #1 in the orig.tar.gz, the win subdirectory contains in.h which is licensed GPL2+ and pwd.h which is 4-clause BSD. This combination is well known to not be distributable. readdir.{h,c} is ASL 1.1 which is also not c

Bug#520977: kdelibs: no distribution license for several files

2009-03-23 Thread Mike O'Connor
Package: kdelibs Version: 3.5.10.dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: dfsg #1 While working on #520485, I noticed that we are distributing several files for while we don't seem to have a distribution license. kio/kssl/kssl/{cert_bundle,certbundle_Makefile} say: Copyright (c) 1998 Ralf S. E

Bug#520485: kdelibs: inadequate copyright file prevents binary packages from being legally distributable

2009-03-20 Thread Mike O'Connor
Package: kdelibs Version: 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 Sune suggested I look at kde packages to see if they have adequate debian/copyright. I'm sorry but they don't seem to. Although I only did a very brief check, I see several problems right away. Below are s