I agree and we should move quickly to ensure it is done before the lenny
freeze.
Question: is ibus a complete replacement for scim at this stage? If so we
may want to deprecate scim altogether.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
ow what you have
against NMUs. They are not a personal insult you know. A fixed Qt
absolutely has to get into sarge. The current version simply isn't good
enough.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
of the debian
patches failed to apply and I didn't check to see if any of the patches
were still relevant for the new version. Perhaps someone on debian-qt-kde
or at debconf would like to do this properly?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
On Sun, 30 May 2004, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Well, my packages are not yet fit for upload yet. They contain some
> drastic changes that really need to be tested more.
>
Would it be possible to upload the latest version at least? That would
solve my problem.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMA
se Qt extensively at work and am
> extremely dissatisfied with the packages currently in Debian.
Go for it. I sympathize with madkiss if he is busy but he should have the
decency to ask for help instead of leaving such an important package to
stagnate like this.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL
irst.
Isn't this part of the main KDE distribution now? So won't it be
pointless to package it seperately?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/
6 matches
Mail list logo
