Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-14 Thread Andres Salomon
On Fri, Oct 14 2022 at 12:54:53 PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: Hi, let me try to summarize where we stand and what options and open questions we have. I see the following options to package the bdic-Files (seems not all of them were already mentioned before): a) Bundle the bdic files i

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-10-14 Thread Andres Salomon
FYI: Chromium includes an embedded copy of the hunspell library, which they've forked to ignore dic/aff files and instead use bdic files. The patch and google additions can be found here: https://sources.debian.org/src/chromium/106.0.5249.119-1/third_party/hunspell/google.patch/ https://sour

Re: Bug#1020387: dictionaries-common: Consensus regarding the packaging of the Qt WebEngine hunspell binary dictionaries

2022-09-27 Thread Andres Salomon
The "team" would just be me (wanna join? :), and I had to do some security uploads today and haven't had the chance to look further into this. Unfortunately, there's a few other high-priority things I need to deal with before I can take a look. On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 20:27, Soren Stoutner w

Re: Chromium Dictionaries

2022-09-22 Thread Andres Salomon
FYI, chromium's documentation about this stuff is here: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/deps/hunspell_dictionaries/+/refs/heads/main/README.chromium It appears that the dictionary files are versioned, and those versions are matched in chromium's source code: https://chromium.google