Comments regarding pkg-kde-tools_0.13.0_amd64.changes

2011-05-24 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi maintainer(s)! >From your changelog: * Ship verbatim texts of the GPL-3 (COPYING.GPL-3), GPL-2 (COPYING.GPL-2) and LGPL-3 (COPYING.LGPL-3) licenses in the source package. I'm curious why you are did that, as all three licenses are already shipped base-files' /usr/share/common-licenses

qtwebkit_2.0~week27-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-07-14 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi maintainers! I'm sorry, but your copyright file is incomplete, as it only mentions the two-clause BSD license, but as you can see: toli...@franck:~$ licensecheck -r qtwebkit-2.0-source/|grep -c -v BSD 2490 There are quite some files not licensed under the terms of any BSD-ish license (mostly

qtwebkit_2.0~week27-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-07-13 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
As requested by maintainer === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Comments regarding qt-sdk_1_amd64.changes

2010-03-23 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi maintainers! I have two questions regarding this package: * Your package depends on libqt4-phonon-dev however I couldn't find it. * This is a empty meta package; wouldn't it be possible to build it from an existing qt package? Best regards, Alexander, ftp-assistant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,