Control: tags -1 +unreproducible
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi!
You've done a MBF despite _negative_ consensus in several discussions
(debian-devel, debootstrap, policy, ...); folks seem to be in agreement
that either the Policy doesn't require building in an environment that
is explicitly "tot
> I have recently upgraded to Buster, and I found that Qt applications don't
> show
> their system tray icons. I use Xfce4. There's no problem with GTK apps, e. g.
> icons of claws-mail, jami and parcellite are shown, but icons of Qt apps, in
> particular psi-plus and hp-systray, don't appear. Thi
tching but I
> know that Adam Borowski already has a patchset, so I leave that to him.
I've tried three setups with elogind:
xfce + lightdm + slick-greeter [amd64]
mate + lightdm + slick-greeter [x32]
xfce + slim [i386]
using the libpam-elogind-compat hack. All work the same: suspend an
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:22:02PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> >> Can you please test that qtdeclarative with your patch builds/works?
> >
> > It built ok. Not sure what's the best way to test whether it executes
> > (end-user reverse-deps like, say, 2048-qt, require far more qt5.4 parts).
>
Sorry for the delay, I was busy, ehm, contemplating how much damage rsync
without --numeric-ids can do.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:04:06PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> A couple of questions though:
>
> > // NOTE: This should match the logic in qv4targetplatform_p.h!
>
> Did you check if ther
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:22:06PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:08:49 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > The fix needs two parts:
> > * applying the attached patch: fixing misdetection of x32 as i386/amd64
> > (a proper port of the JIT would be of cour
Package: qtenginio-opensource-src
Version: 5.3.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: port-x32 ftbfs-x32
Hi!
Your package currently fails to build on x32.
Here's an update to the symbols file.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers unstab
Package: qtwebkit-opensource-src
Version: 5.3.2+dfsg-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
Your package fails to build on the x32 second-class architecture. The
failure stems from use of "cmpxchgq" in assembly code. Dropping the "q"
qualifier lets the compiler infer the argument size, making that c
Package: src:qtdeclarative-opensource-src
Version: 5.3.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
This package fails to build on the x32 second-class architecture. This is
bad as it has a massive amount of reverse [build-]dependencies, both direct
and transitive.
The fix needs two parts:
* applying th
Hi!
Well... it looks like upstream efforts to add x32 JIT have been stalled for
two years already. So let's just disable the JIT, like it's disabled on
most architectures. Could you please upload fixed qtwebkit? It's in
build-dependency chain for a lot of packages.
Daniel's patch requires upda
10 matches
Mail list logo
