kasts 25.04.0-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2025-06-18
It is affected by these RC bugs:
1104727: kasts: Unable to start, missing dependency on
qml6-module-org-kde-kirigamiaddons-settings
https://bugs.debian.org/1104727
For more information on the autoremoval process, including h
Hello,
I am a Debian newbie and I participated in a Bug Squashing Party recently.
I was running arch on my machine, hence I tried reproducing the bug in a
clean QEMU debian image, but matching all the versions getting the exact
packages for each, I was unable to reproduce the bug on my virtual mac
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:39:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096947,
regarding keditbookmarks: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:39:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096951,
regarding kf6-attica: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:39:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096942,
regarding kdialog: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:39:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096941,
regarding kdiamond: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:37:34 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096939,
regarding kdf: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:37:34 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096937,
regarding kdevelop-php: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:37:34 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096938,
regarding kdevelop-python: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:37:34 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096935,
regarding kdevelop: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:37:34 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096936,
regarding kdevelop-pg-qt: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:34:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096934,
regarding kdesdk-thumbnailers: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:34:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096932,
regarding kdepim-addons: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:34:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096933,
regarding kdeplasma-addons: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:34:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096931,
regarding kdepim-runtime: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:34:18 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096930,
regarding kdenetwork-filesharing: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:31:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096927,
regarding kdecoration: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:31:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096928,
regarding kdegraphics-mobipocket: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:31:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096926,
regarding kdeconnect: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:31:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096924,
regarding kdebugsettings: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2025 21:31:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096925,
regarding kde-spectacle: ftbfs with GCC-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Source: tokodon
Version: 24.12.0-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-shuffle
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic ordering
of target prerequisites. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and
Source: qtdeclarative-opensource-src-gles
Version: 5.15.15+dfsg-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-shuffle
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic ordering
of target prerequisites. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-
Source: qtdeclarative-opensource-src
Version: 5.15.15+dfsg-3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-shuffle
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic ordering
of target prerequisites. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-m
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: pysi...@packages.debian.org, stu...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:pyside6
Please unblock package pyside6
[ Reason ]
In #1104849, we found that the path to the dev tools
25 matches
Mail list logo
