Bug#1096921: marked as done (kde-dev-utils: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:37:49 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096921, regarding kde-dev-utils: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#1096922: marked as done (kde-gtk-config: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:37:49 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096922, regarding kde-gtk-config: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#1096923: marked as done (kde-inotify-survey: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:37:49 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096923, regarding kde-inotify-survey: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#1096919: marked as done (kde-cli-tools: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:37:49 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096919, regarding kde-cli-tools: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#1096920: marked as done (kcron: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:37:49 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096920, regarding kcron: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#1096914: marked as done (kcalutils: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:34:51 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096914, regarding kcalutils: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#1096912: marked as done (kcalc: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:34:51 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096912, regarding kcalc: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#1096916: marked as done (kcollectd: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:34:51 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096916, regarding kcollectd: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#1096911: marked as done (kcachegrind: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:34:51 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096911, regarding kcachegrind: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#1096913: marked as done (kcharselect: ftbfs with GCC-15)

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2025 22:34:51 +0200 with message-id and subject line ftbfs with GCC-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096913, regarding kcharselect: ftbfs with GCC-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#1105175: plasma-workspace: 100% of one CPU at startup for plasmashell

2025-05-12 Thread marc
Package: plasma-workspace Version: 4:6.3.4-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@gallifrey-blr.fr Dear Maintainer, Since the new update, at startup after validating my password, plasmashell use 100% of one CPU during about 2 or 3 minutes. during that time, Plasma is not usable. After that time

[bts-link] source package dolphin

2025-05-12 Thread debian-bts-link
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package dolphin # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ # user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org # remote status report for #1104487 (http://bugs.debian.org/1104487

Processed: [bts-link] source package dolphin

2025-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package dolphin > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org Setting

Bug#949902: qtwebsockets-opensource-src ftbfs on s390x: timeout too short

2025-05-12 Thread Berli Gayathri
Hi Paul/ Dmitry Shachnev, For some amount of time, buildd and CI has not reported any failures for this package. So, if everything is fine, can we close this bug? Thanks, Gayathri