Processed: Bug#1075426 marked as pending in qbs

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1075426 [src:qbs] qbs: ftbfs with GCC-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1075426: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075426 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#1074633: qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 apt Bug #1074633 [src:qt6-base] qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them Bug reassigned from package 'src:qt6-base' to 'apt'. No longer marked as found in versions qt6-base/6.6.2+dfsg-8. Ignoring request

Bug#1074633: qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them

Control: reassign -1 apt Control: retitle -1 When installing a package, apt should always upgrade rather than remove packages to satisfy dependencies Control: severity -1 normal Control: found -1 2.6.1 Control: found -1 2.9.5 Control: found -1 2.9.6 Note: In the initial test, I had done "apt inst

debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org

Hi Patrick, I do not want to put too much burden on the Qt/KDE team. I've seen in the past weeks Qt6, then KF6 and now Plasma6 steadily being packaged and uploaded into experimental, making it easier and easier for me to test the plasma-mobile_6.x packaging. I know it's a big effort, so big th

Bug#1074633: qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them

Hej Vincent, Am Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2024, 01:02:28 CEST schrieb Vincent Lefevre: [...] > In particular, "apt install libqt6core6t64" wants to remove > qt6-wayland, but if I try "apt install libqt6core6t64 qt6-wayland", > then the upgrade is fine. So there seems to be really something > wrong with th

Bug#1075716: ktouch: Unable to type characters under native wayland client

Package: ktouch Version: 4:22.12.3-1+b1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: ybx...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Upstream fixed the bug in version 23.08 and beyond, so please update the package so the problem can be solved. Thanks for your help. -- System Information: Debian Release: trixie/sid AP

Re: QT target version for trixie

Hi! On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 08:07, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Cc'd the mailing list I mentioned below. > > Alexandre Rossi - 03.07.24, 12:29:06 CEST: > > (Please CC me, I'm not subscribed) > > > > Wanting to fix #1073004, I was wondering what was the target version of > > QT for trixie? Should a

Bug#1075430: qtlocation-opensource-src: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:qtlocation-opensource-src Version: 5.15.13+dfsg-2 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a

Bug#1075433: qzxing: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:qzxing Version: 3.3.0+dfsg-5 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another packa

Bug#1075429: qt6-webengine: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:qt6-webengine Version: 6.6.2+dfsg-4 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in anothe

Bug#1075431: qtwebkit-opensource-src: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:qtwebkit-opensource-src Version: 5.212.0~alpha4-38 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If

Bug#1075426: qbs: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:qbs Version: 2.3.1-4 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package is re

Bug#1075143: libappimage: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:libappimage Version: 1.0.4-5-3.1 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another p

Bug#1075123: kseexpr: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:kseexpr Version: 4.0.4.0-6 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package

Bug#1075122: krunner: ftbfs with GCC-14

Package: src:krunner Version: 5.115.0-2 Severity: important Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-14 [This bug is targeted to the upcoming trixie release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package

Re: QT target version for trixie

Cc'd the mailing list I mentioned below. Alexandre Rossi - 03.07.24, 12:29:06 CEST: > (Please CC me, I'm not subscribed) > > Wanting to fix #1073004, I was wondering what was the target version of > QT for trixie? Should an application build against QT5 or QT6? > > I have not been able to find th

Bug#1074633: qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them

In case this can be useful, I've attached the output of apt-get install libqt6core6t64 -s -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC

Bug#1074633: qt6-base: upgrading libqt6core6t64 removes qpdfview and wireshark instead of upgrading them

Note that as noted in its changelog, there was a regression in apt 2.9.5. However, apt 2.9.6 yields the same behavior. And to be sure that there wasn't any other regression, I downgraded apt to stable and installed libapt-pkg6.0 from stable (replacing the libapt-pkg6.0t64 package from the t64 trans