qt6-webengine_6.4.2-final+dfsg-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2023-07-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:13:26 +0200 Source: qt6-webengine Architecture: source Version: 6.4.2-final+dfsg-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintai

Processing of qt6-webengine_6.4.2-final+dfsg-7_source.changes

2023-07-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
qt6-webengine_6.4.2-final+dfsg-7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: qt6-webengine_6.4.2-final+dfsg-7.dsc qt6-webengine_6.4.2-final+dfsg-7.debian.tar.xz qt6-webengine_6.4.2-final+dfsg-7_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (runnin

Processed: tagging 1037833

2023-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1037833 + ftbfs Bug #1037833 [src:qzxing] qzxing: ftbfs with GCC-13 Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1037833: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037833 Debia

Processed: tagging 1037709

2023-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1037709 + ftbfs Bug #1037709 [src:kitinerary] kitinerary: ftbfs with GCC-13 Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1037709: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10377

Bug#1030895: qt6-webengine: Enable riscv64 support

2023-07-20 Thread Bo YU
Hi! On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:15 PM Patrick Franz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 23:32:53 +0800 Bo YU wrote: > [...] > > Could you try it on the next upload? > > > > Thanks again for all here. > > Before we can consider applying this patch, there is the question of > maintenance. I am n

Bug#1030895: qt6-webengine: Enable riscv64 support

2023-07-20 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi, On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 23:32:53 +0800 Bo YU wrote: [...] > Could you try it on the next upload? > > Thanks again for all here. Before we can consider applying this patch, there is the question of maintenance. I am not very keen on having a 12.000-line patch to maintain for qtwebengine which