#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package ksystemlog
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #889919 (http://bugs.debian.org/88991
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package ksystemlog
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Sett
Package: sddm
Version: 0.18.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
your package currently Recommends: haveged. On modern kernels, so
whatever will ship in bulleye, the kernel will provide enough entropy,
so there should be no need for haveged, except in exceptional
situations.
Please remove the
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/302175
Bug #958479 [qt5-qmake] qmake passes unsupported -isystem to gcc
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/302175'.
--
958479: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi
Control: forwarded -1 https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/302175
Hi Helmut,
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:35:10PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I looked and the process is waaay to beyond what I can do. I'm not up to
> consenting to a 10-page TOS for a 5-line patch. Sorry.
>
> The 5-page
Hey,
> Also replying to debian-qt-kde, in case some team members are not
> following debian-kde.
this list is for bugreports only. If you want to reach the Maintainer team you
need to use the pkg-kde-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net.
hefee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mess
6 matches
Mail list logo
