Your message dated Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:55:10 +0200
with message-id <20160721065510.gs11...@gnuservers.com.ar>
and subject line Re: Bug#831898: kdepim-addons: package was built 2016-07-07
and uploaded but didn't appear in archives
has caused the Debian Bug report #831898,
regarding kdepim-addons: p
plasma-discover 5.6.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-11
It is affected by these RC bugs:
830948: plasma-discover-common,plasma-discover-private: plasma-discover-private
and plasma-discover-common: error when trying to install together
Package: kde-telepathy-contact-list
Version: 15.08.3-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After upgrading to 15.08.3-1, ktp-contactlist (or the plasma applets) no longer
can log into gtalk or sip. These are possibly separate bugs as sip auth handler
segfaults whereas gtalk simply does not becom
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 22:10:41 +0200
Source: pkg-kde-tools
Binary: pkg-kde-tools libdlrestrictions1 libdlrestrictions-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 0.15.22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE M
pkg-kde-tools_0.15.22_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pkg-kde-tools_0.15.22.dsc
pkg-kde-tools_0.15.22.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Package: kaddressbook
Version: 4:16.04.3-1
Severity: normal
Wenn starting in a terminal kaddressbook, I get the following output:
org.kde.akonadi.ETM: GEN true false true
org.kde.akonadi.ETM: collection: QVector()
KCrash: crashing... crashRecursionCounter = 2
KCrash: Application Name = kaddressboo
Package: kdepim-addons
Version: 16.04.2-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
from Debian Package Auto-Building:
kdepim-addons for arch i386 was built 12 days ago and uploaded but
didn't appear in the archive. I'm not able to figure out further
the reason for this delay.
Without this package there are no heade
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libsmokeakonadi3 | 4:4.14.3-1 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libsmokeakonadi3 | 4:4.14.3-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
l
Version: 4:4.14.3-2+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package smokekde has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/831882
T
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:50:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831882: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #812001,
regarding smokekde: FTBFS with GCC 6: deleted function
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On miércoles, 20 de julio de 2016 2:28:07 P. M. ART Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Dear KDE Maintainers,
>
> it would be great if you could have a look at the list of "orphaned"
> bugs again. Since squeeze got archived (and therefore some binary
> packages no longer exist) the BTS has lost the associat
On miércoles, 20 de julio de 2016 9:04:21 A. M. ART Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you earlier.
>
> On Thursday, 24 September 2015 15:07:05 CEST Charles Samuels wrote:
> > Can we get a backport into jessie-backports?
Due to my recent experience with backports no
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
smokekde is no longer shipped upstream, and to be fair the development of the
smoke components has stopped long before that. So we would like to drop it
from the archive. There shouldn't be any reverse dependencies left in sid.
(korundum and kde-workspac
Dear KDE Maintainers,
it would be great if you could have a look at the list of "orphaned"
bugs again. Since squeeze got archived (and therefore some binary
packages no longer exist) the BTS has lost the association of these old
bugs with the packages they belong to. I think I've already killed at
Hi,
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier.
On Thursday, 24 September 2015 15:07:05 CEST Charles Samuels wrote:
> Can we get a backport into jessie-backports?
To provide packages in jessie-backports we would need a confirmation that we
are about to improve something.
> testing is now uninst
15 matches
Mail list logo
