qtwebkit-opensource-src_5.6.0+dfsg-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:39:26 +0100 Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src Binary: libqt5webkit5-dev libqt5webkit5 qml-module-qtwebkit libqt5webkit5-dbg qtwebkit5-doc qtwebkit5-doc-html Architecture: source Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1

Processing of qtwebkit-opensource-src_5.6.0+dfsg-1_source.changes

qtwebkit-opensource-src_5.6.0+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: qtwebkit-opensource-src_5.6.0+dfsg-1.dsc qtwebkit-opensource-src_5.6.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz qtwebkit-opensource-src_5.6.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemo

Bug#818832: marble: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope

Package: marble Version: 4:15.08.3-1.1 Severity: important User: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 2.23 This package fails to build with libc6 2.23 (2.23-0experimental0 from experimental). > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.68.0 (15 Jan 2016) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux ... > Scanning dependencies of ta

Bug#818824: libksysguard: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isinf' was not declared in this scope

Package: libksysguard Version: 4:5.4.3-1 Severity: important User: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 2.23 This package fails to build with libc6 2.23 (2.23-0experimental0 from experimental). > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.68.0 (15 Jan 2016) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux ... > -gnu/qt5/QtWebKitWidgets

Bug#818810: FTBFS with libc 2.23: 'isnan' was not declared in this scope

Package: kmplot Version: 4:15.08.3-1 Severity: important User: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org Usertags: 2.23 This package fails to build with libc6 2.23 (2.23-0experimental0 from experimental). > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.68.0 (15 Jan 2016) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux ... > In file included from /<>/kmp

Bug#818653: Fine but when will we be able to test experimental

On Sunday 20 March 2016 17:23:44 Eric Valette wrote: [snip] > True but on the otehr hand you could rebuild the offending packages > specifically for experimental using qt 4.6 dependencies. Because as it > is you let the user with the choice of not updating or building the > packages themselves...

Bug#818653: Fine but when will we be able to test experimental

On 20/03/2016 15:06, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: On Sunday 20 March 2016 10:08:07 Eric Valette wrote: I intended the bug as whislist but my first one didn't get correctly out. The second time I forgot... The real question is that for months we are unable to have a working kde/exp

Bug#818653: Fine but when will we be able to test experimental

On Sunday 20 March 2016 10:08:07 Eric Valette wrote: > I intended the bug as whislist but my first one didn't get correctly > out. The second time I forgot... > > The real question is that for months we are unable to have a working > kde/experimental environment. So no test of qt 5.6 and newer kde

Bug#818653: Fine but when will we be able to test experimental

I intended the bug as whislist but my first one didn't get correctly out. The second time I forgot... The real question is that for months we are unable to have a working kde/experimental environment. So no test of qt 5.6 and newer kde... -- eric

Bug#794110: More info needed

tag 794110 moreinfo thanks Hi everyone! With my Qt maintainer hat on, I would like you to give me some info. First: We have only one backtrace coming from the original submitter. Can the rest of you check if when a crash happens the current thread's (the crashing one) backtrace says something

Re: Needed suggestions for creating a QT5 patched libraries package

On Friday 18 March 2016 11:50:45 Sandro Knauß wrote: > Hey Giovanni, > > cool that you want to package telegram desktop. > > > However, Telegram Desktop requires a patched version of QT5; this is not > > a major issue, I've already created such a package, based on the latest > > Debian/Ubuntu sou