On Thursday 09 April 2015 01:07:47 peter green wrote:
> I meant to bring this up earlier but didn't get arround to it.
>
> In raspbian jessie we have encountered some symbols differences from
> Debian armhf, so-far i've been marking the symbols in question as
> optional but i'm not positive if thi
I meant to bring this up earlier but didn't get arround to it.
In raspbian jessie we have encountered some symbols differences from
Debian armhf, so-far i've been marking the symbols in question as
optional but i'm not positive if this is the right thing to do.
You can see our debdiffs at
ht
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 02:07:49 Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 02:04 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Upstream's patch is available at
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/106514/
> >
> > It's still failing to integrate due to tests failing, so we still need
> > to
Your message dated Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:19:39 -0300
with message-id <2179690.C2ZR82Oekj@luna>
and subject line Not applicable since a long time ago
has caused the Debian Bug report #561759,
regarding qt4-x11: predictable random number generator used
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
On Tuesday 07 April 2015 09:40:30 Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src
> Version: 5.3.2+dfsg-4
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The package fails to build properly on build official build boxes due
> to many missing symbols on sparc [1].
>
> The lack of Qt develop
Source: qtbase-opensource-src
Severity: minor
It's hard to get back into a clean state (e.g. when trying to patch):
/
| make[3]: Entering directory
'/usr/local/src/debian/qtbase-opensource-src-5.3.2+dfsg/qmake'
| rm -f project.o option.o property.o main.o ioutils.o proitems.o qmakevfs.o
6 matches
Mail list logo
