Bug#523413: It won't fix

tag 523413 wontfix thanks Hi! This particular bug will not be fixed in Qt4 because it is deprecated by upstream, only bug fixes can happen (this is considered as a feature request). You can try building your app with Qt5. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- If little green men land in your back yard,

Processed: It won't fix

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 523413 wontfix Bug #523413 [libqtgui4] [libqtgui4] QPrinter dialogue has no odd/even pages selection Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 523413: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#750285: marked as done (korundum: FTBFS: dh_install: ruby-kde4 missing files (usr/lib/*/ruby/vendor_ruby/*/nepomuk.so), aborting)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014 23:56:45 +0200 with message-id <20140609215645.GB31565@spin> and subject line fixed by 4.13.1-1 upload has caused the Debian Bug report #750285, regarding korundum: FTBFS: dh_install: ruby-kde4 missing files (usr/lib/*/ruby/vendor_ruby/*/nepomuk.so), aborting to

Processed: fixed 750285 in korundum/4:4.13.1-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 750285 korundum/4:4.13.1-1 Bug #750285 [src:korundum] korundum: FTBFS: dh_install: ruby-kde4 missing files (usr/lib/*/ruby/vendor_ruby/*/nepomuk.so), aborting Marked as fixed in versions korundum/4:4.13.1-1. > thanks Stopping processing her

Processed: [bts-link] source package kdeplasma-addons

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdeplasma-addons > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth

Processed: [bts-link] source package umbrello

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package umbrello > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.

Processed: [bts-link] source package qt4-x11

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package qt4-x11 > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o

Processed: [bts-link] source package lskat

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package lskat > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#641747: Closed?

I can confirm that the problem no longer exists for me. However, I am not the original submitter of the bug. On Monday, June 09, 2014 09:42:47 AM Jim Scadden wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:54:22PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > This bug is no longer an issue for me (and hasn't been so for

Processed: Re: Bug#750995: does this bug affect wheezy too?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 750995 4:4.12.4-2 Bug #750995 [kdepim-runtime] Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing Marked as found in versions kdepim-runtime/4:4.12.4-2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y

Bug#750995: does this bug affect wheezy too?

found 750995 4:4.12.4-2 thanks On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:56:01PM +0800, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le 2014-06-09 19:14, Holger Levsen a écrit : > >does this bug ("Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as > >dialog keeps appearing") affect wheezy too? Or is that jessie only? > >

Bug#750995: does this bug affect wheezy too?

Hi Jim, On Montag, 9. Juni 2014, Jim Scadden wrote: > I have just set up wheezy on a VM and cancelling the connection works as > expected. This bug only appears to affect jessie. thanks for the followup & clarification! cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally s

Bug#641589: marked as done (LibreOffice starts when surfing the web with konqueror)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:54:05 +0100 with message-id <20140609145405.ga3...@jessie.tsa.lan> and subject line Re: Bug#641747: Closed? has caused the Debian Bug report #641747, regarding LibreOffice starts when surfing the web with konqueror to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#641897: marked as done (webkit is calling libreoffice unwanted)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:54:05 +0100 with message-id <20140609145405.ga3...@jessie.tsa.lan> and subject line Re: Bug#641747: Closed? has caused the Debian Bug report #641747, regarding webkit is calling libreoffice unwanted to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#641747: marked as done (konqueror is starting libreoffice when starting)

Your message dated Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:54:05 +0100 with message-id <20140609145405.ga3...@jessie.tsa.lan> and subject line Re: Bug#641747: Closed? has caused the Debian Bug report #641747, regarding konqueror is starting libreoffice when starting to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

qtdeclarative-opensource-src_5.3.0-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:20:20 -0300 Source: qtdeclarative-opensource-src Binary: libqt5qml5 libqt5quick5 libqt5quickparticles5 libqt5quicktest5 libqt5quickwidgets5 qml-module-qt-labs-folderlistmodel qml-module-qtquick-loc

Bug#750995: does this bug affect wheezy too?

Le 2014-06-09 19:14, Holger Levsen a écrit : does this bug ("Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing") affect wheezy too? Or is that jessie only? TBH, I don't know; I don't have a Wheezy install handy. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#641747: Closed?

Am Montag, 9. Juni 2014, 09:42:47 schrieben Sie: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:54:22PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > This bug is no longer an issue for me (and hasn't been so for a long > > time). > > Any reason we shouldn't close it? > > If you can confirm that the bug is no longer present then

Bug#750141: libqt4-xml: vulnerable to billion laughs attack

On 09/06/14 15:17, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:30:15PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: tag 750141 moreinfo thanks On Monday 02 June 2014 11:19:05 Hamish Moffatt wrote: Package: libqt4-xml Severity: serious Tags: security Justification: securit

Bug#750995: does this bug affect wheezy too?

Hi, does this bug ("Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing") affect wheezy too? Or is that jessie only? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#750995: Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing

forwarded 750995 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335994 tags 750995 + upstream patch thanks Bug forwarded to KDE BTS https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335994 with patches which provide a workaround -- Jim Scadden --- a/kimap/loginjob.cpp +++ b/kimap/loginjob.cpp @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@

Processed: Re: Bug#750995: Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 750995 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335994 Bug #750995 [kdepim-runtime] Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335994

Bug#750995: Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:33:28PM +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > The "cancel" button has no effects other than to bring the same dialog > almost instantly back in an infinite loop. I can confirm this behaviour. The cause is that kdepim-runtime treats the SSL cancellation the same as a bad p

Processed: Re: Bug#745556: Closing dialog for allowing invalid SSL certificate causes default to be accepted

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 745556 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335375 Bug #745556 [libkio5] Closing dialog for allowing invalid SSL certificate causes default to be accepted Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335375'. >

Bug#745556: Closing dialog for allowing invalid SSL certificate causes default to be accepted

forwarded 745556 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335375 thanks Closing the dialog for choosing how long to accept an invalid certificate for (which gives the options to accept Forever, or for Current Session Only) causes the default option of Current Session Only to be accepted Steps to R

Bug#745556: kmail accepts invalid SMTP TLS certificate against user action

clone 745556 -1 reassign 745556 libkio5 severity 745556 important retitle 745556 Closing dialog for allowing invalid SSL certificate causes default to be accepted reassign -1 kdepim-runtime retitle -1 Cannot reject invalid SSL certificate for IMAP server as dialog keeps appearing thanks -- Jim

Processed: Re: Bug#745556: kmail accepts invalid SMTP TLS certificate against user action

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 745556 -1 Bug #745556 [kmail] kmail accepts invalid SMTP TLS certificate against user action Bug 745556 cloned as bug 750995 > reassign 745556 libkio5 Bug #745556 [kmail] kmail accepts invalid SMTP TLS certificate against user action Bug r

Bug#641747: Closed?

On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:54:22PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > This bug is no longer an issue for me (and hasn't been so for a long time). > Any reason we shouldn't close it? If you can confirm that the bug is no longer present then I see no reason not to close it. From looking at the bug re

Bug#737396: kscreensaver: locked screen allows any password if a third session (vt9) is also active

On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:52:54AM +0200, Lajos Mester wrote: > I tried to log in a diffrerent order, and came out, that it wasn't the number > of the VT-s, but allways the same user who got logged in without a valid > password. > > I have no idea why this happened. And I'm unable to reproduce i