On Monday 27 January 2014 22:32:01 Wookey wrote:
[snip]
> > Wookey: are there any arm64 porterboxes available? I can't promise
> > anything, but maybe at some point I could help...
>
> Not yet. No. And I don't yet know when there might be. 'In time for
> Jessie, hopefully' is the only clue I've ha
On Monday 27 January 2014 18:20:21 Wookey wrote:
[snip]
> > Qt4 patches are not accepted upstream. All new code has to go to Qt5 and
> > since 5.2.0 QAtomics stuff is using std::atomic so compiler takes care
> > of it and there is no code for separate architectures.
>
> Are QT4 patches going to be
On Monday 27 January 2014 19:29:04 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
[snip]
> > Are QT4 patches going to be accepted at some point or will distros have
> > to carry an arm64 patch for QT4 as long as it remains supported?
>
> Ask in https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35442 please
I'll take ca
On Monday 27 January 2014 19:32:43 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 27.01.2014 19:14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
> > So what we are currently missing should be:
> >
> > - The copyright and license of the qatomic stuff.
>
> Author: Mark Salter
> License: same as upstream one
\o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 27.01.2014 19:14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
> So what we are currently missing should be:
>
> - The copyright and license of the qatomic stuff.
Author: Mark Salter
License: same as upstream one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
W dniu 27.01.2014 19:20, Wookey pisze:
> +++ Marcin Juszkiewicz [2014-01-27 17:41 +0100]:
>>> - It uses linux-g++ instead of linux-g++-64. While that could be the best
>>> fit,
>>> it would be good to know why.
>>
>> Maybe it is because linux-g++ may use '-m64' argument for GCC which
>> AArch64
On Monday 27 January 2014 17:41:26 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
[snip]
> > - It uses linux-g++ instead of linux-g++-64. While that could be the best
> > fit, it would be good to know why.
>
> Maybe it is because linux-g++ may use '-m64' argument for GCC which
> AArch64 does not support so build fails
+++ Marcin Juszkiewicz [2014-01-27 17:41 +0100]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> W dniu 23.01.2014 18:57, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
> > I've tried to summarize the current arm64 situation. The following are my
> > conclusions, feel free to point if something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 23.01.2014 18:57, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer pisze:
> I've tried to summarize the current arm64 situation. The following are my
> conclusions, feel free to point if something is wrong, give more
> info/feedback, etc.
As you know from
binary:libkwinglesutils1 is NEW.
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.de
kde-workspace_4.11.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kde-workspace_4.11.5-1.dsc
kde-workspace_4.11.5.orig.tar.xz
kde-workspace_4.11.5-1.debian.tar.xz
kde-workspace_4.11.5-1_all.deb
kdebase-workspace_4.11.5-1_all.deb
plasma-desktop_4.11.5-1_amd64.
11 matches
Mail list logo
