Processed: Re: Processed: block 618325 with 618748

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unblock 618325 with 618748 Bug #618325 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] Was blocked by: 618748 Removed blocking bug(s) of 618325: 618748 > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#618325: Processed: block 618325 with 618748

unblock 618325 with 618748 kthxbye On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 21:42:04 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > block 618325 with 618748 > Bug #618325 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with > signal 9 [Killed] > Was not

Processed: block 618325 with 618748

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 618325 with 618748 Bug #618325 [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 618325: 618748 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Processed: reopening 618325

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 618325 Bug #618325 {Done: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers } [src:qtwebkit] qtwebkit: FTBFS on armel: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to rem

Processed: increasing severity of this bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 618637 grave Bug #618637 [kppp] kppp does not work after upgrade from Lenny to Squeeze Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 618637: http://bugs.debian.org

Re: contribution to koffice packaging

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:36:56PM +0100, Adrien wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using Debian, KDE and Koffice for a few years now. I recently > saw that the maintainers of Koffice are looking for help : > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541691 > > So I am offering my help, as I am

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

Modestas Vainius wrote: >>> + [...] The following Phonon >>> + backend packages seem to be available for this system at the moment: >> >> As long as we can trust the detection (what does this depend on?) > > phonon-backends provide 'phonon-backend' virtual package. Yes, and I don't see any non-fr

phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: libphonon-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/libphonon-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphonon4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/libphonon4_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libphononexperimental-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb to main/p/phonon/libphono

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

Quoting Modestas Vainius (mo...@debian.org): > > s/behaviour/behavior/ > > Are we using American English in Debian? In Debian overall, here's no such high consistency. However, in Smith reviews, we settled for en_US spelling, yes (the rationale being that it appeared to be used more often than e

Processing of phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.changes

phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.dsc phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0.orig.tar.bz2 phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1.debian.tar.gz phonon_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_all.deb libphonon-dev_4.6.0really4.5.0-1_amd64.deb libpho

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

Hello, by the way, I get: E: phonon: description-starts-with-package-name with the latest (2 mails above) control. -- Modestas Vainius signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [RFR] templates://phonon/{phonon-backend-null.templates}

Hello, On antradienis 22 Kovas 2011 14:02:37 Justin B Rye wrote: > > + If you wish to restore full Phonon multimedia capabilities, you > > + should install a real Phonon backend. The following Phonon > > + backend packages seem to be available for this system at the moment: > As long as we can tr

Re: eigen3 packages

Hi, all I have done some changes on eigen3 package. Plese, have a look at [1]. I would appreciate any comments and suggestions. Thanks [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/krap/eigen3.git Anton On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Anton Gladky wrote: > Thanks! > > Anton > > > > > On Fri, Mar 2